NCT01572246

Brief Summary

This observational protocol will evaluate the effects of monopolar electrocautery (ME) on implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in patients undergoing surgery. ME can cause electromagnetic interference (EMI) leading to ICD damage or inadvertent ICD discharge (shocks). Recommended practice calls for the preoperative reprogramming of ICDs when ME will be used to prevent patients from receiving inadvertent shocks. This requires the presence of someone trained in ICD programming, but a trained person is not always readily available. In this study the investigators will reprogram ICDs prior to surgery according to current practice, but will also record what would have happened had the ICD reprogramming not occurred ("detection on" but "therapy off"). In addition, the investigators will evaluate the effect of the location of the electrosurgery unit (ESU) return pad on the incidence of EMI. The investigators hypothesize that directing the current return path away from the ICD will result in lower EMI rates than previously described.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
167

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2012

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 27, 2012

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 6, 2012

Completed
25 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2012

Completed
4.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 14, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 14, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

February 24, 2017

Status Verified

August 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

4.4 years

First QC Date

March 27, 2012

Last Update Submit

February 23, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

electrosurgeryCardiac surgical proceduresSurgical procedures, operativeDefibrillators

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Incidence of electromagnetic interference (EMI)

    Evaluation of occurence of EMI when monopolar electrocautery is used in surgical procedures when the patient has an existing ICD.

    During surgery on day of enrollment

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Incidence of unexpected preoperative ICD-related problems

    Up to 6 months prior to date of surgery

Study Arms (3)

Non-cardiac above-the-waist surgery

Subjects with an implanted ICD who present for a non-cardiac above-the-waist surgical procedure involving monopolar electrocautery

Other: Optimal placement of return pad

Cardiac surgery

Subjects with an implanted ICD who present for a cardiac surgical procedure involving monopolar electrocautery

Below-the-waist surgery

Subjects with an implanted ICD who present for a below-the-waist surgical procedure involving monopolar electrocautery

Interventions

The ESU return pad will be placed in an optimal position in order to direct ME current away from the ICD pulse generators.

Non-cardiac above-the-waist surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Subjects with ICDs (including cardiac resynchronization therapy system-defibrillators) scheduled for surgery involving ME.

You may qualify if:

  • Adult individuals of both genders, 18 years of age and older
  • For patients undergoing surgery about the waist, previous implantation of a functioning Boston Scientific or Medtronic ICD
  • For patients undergoing surgery below the waist, previous implantation of a functioning Boston Scientific, Medtronic, St. Jude Medical, or Biotronik ICD
  • Signed informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Surgery involving the ICD pocket (generator change out procedure)
  • Surgery or procedures exclusively involving bipolar electrocautery (such as ophthalmic surgery)
  • Patients undergoing surgery above the waist with ICDs not manufactured by Medtronic or Boston Scientific (other ICDs do not allow reprogramming to allow EMI detection without the potential for inadvertent ICD discharge)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Oregon Health & Science University

Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists. Practice advisory for the perioperative management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: an updated report by the american society of anesthesiologists task force on perioperative management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Anesthesiology. 2011 Feb;114(2):247-61. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fbe7f6. No abstract available.

    PMID: 21245737BACKGROUND
  • Crossley GH, Poole JE, Rozner MA, Asirvatham SJ, Cheng A, Chung MK, Ferguson TB Jr, Gallagher JD, Gold MR, Hoyt RH, Irefin S, Kusumoto FM, Moorman LP, Thompson A. The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Expert Consensus Statement on the perioperative management of patients with implantable defibrillators, pacemakers and arrhythmia monitors: facilities and patient management this document was developed as a joint project with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), and in collaboration with the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Heart Rhythm. 2011 Jul;8(7):1114-54. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.12.023. No abstract available.

    PMID: 21722856BACKGROUND
  • Stone KR, McPherson CA. Assessment and management of patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Crit Care Med. 2004 Apr;32(4 Suppl):S155-65. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000115622.73988.6e.

    PMID: 15064674BACKGROUND
  • Rozner MA. The patient with a cardiac pacemaker or implanted defibrillator and management during anaesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007 Jun;20(3):261-8. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32814f1c4a.

    PMID: 17479032BACKGROUND
  • Korantzopoulos P, Letsas KP, Grekas G, Goudevenos JA. Pacemaker dependency after implantation of electrophysiological devices. Europace. 2009 Sep;11(9):1151-5. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup195. Epub 2009 Jul 16.

    PMID: 19617204BACKGROUND
  • Cheng A, Nazarian S, Spragg DD, Bilchick K, Tandri H, Mark L, Halperin H, Calkins H, Berger RD, Henrikson CA. Effects of surgical and endoscopic electrocautery on modern-day permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Mar;31(3):344-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.00996.x.

    PMID: 18307631BACKGROUND
  • Fiek M, Dorwarth U, Durchlaub I, Janko S, Von Bary C, Steinbeck G, Hoffmann E. Application of radiofrequency energy in surgical and interventional procedures: are there interactions with ICDs? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004 Mar;27(3):293-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00430.x.

    PMID: 15009852BACKGROUND
  • Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators. A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med. 1997 Nov 27;337(22):1576-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199711273372202.

    PMID: 9411221BACKGROUND
  • Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, Klein H, Wilber DJ, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, Higgins SL, Brown MW, Andrews ML; Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II Investigators. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 21;346(12):877-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013474. Epub 2002 Mar 19.

    PMID: 11907286BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart FailureTachycardia, VentricularHyperthermia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesTachycardiaArrhythmias, CardiacCardiac Conduction System DiseasePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBody Temperature ChangesSigns and SymptomsHeat Stress DisordersWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Peter Schulman, MD

    Oregon Health and Science University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Charles Henrikson, MD

    Oregon Health and Science University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2012

First Posted

April 6, 2012

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion

September 14, 2016

Study Completion

September 14, 2016

Last Updated

February 24, 2017

Record last verified: 2016-08

Locations