NCT01568528

Brief Summary

The focus of the current project is to advance our understanding of the effects of oxytocin (OT) on components of social cognition in schizophrenia (SCZ). Despite the rapid increase in our understanding of the role of OT in rodent models of social behavior and an explosion of interest in the prosocial effects of OT in healthy controls, little work has been done to dissect the potential effects of OT on SCZ subjects with social deficits. Social deficits are a crucial aspect of the functional impairments that limit the rehabilitation of patients with SCZ. In particular, SCZ patients with enduring negative symptoms (deficit syndrome, Kirkpatrick et al. 1989) have prominent social deficits as a core feature of this subtype of the illness. Our currently available medications do very little to improve these social deficits. Hence it is of utmost public health importance to address the knowledge gap regarding the potential of OT to improve social function in this illness. Intact social function depends on the competent functioning of several cognitive domains that subserve perception of social cues and the generation of motivated social behavior. We propose to conduct a pharmacological challenge study of OT vs. placebo administration to study the effects of OT on specific components of social cognition in male deficit syndrome SCZ subjects. Primary Hypothesis: Intranasal OT will improve social cognition in subjects with deficit syndrome SCZ.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
39

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2 schizophrenia

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2013

Longer than P75 for phase_2 schizophrenia

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 28, 2012

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 2, 2012

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2013

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 15, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 15, 2017

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 4, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

September 4, 2019

Status Verified

August 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

March 28, 2012

Results QC Date

July 23, 2019

Last Update Submit

August 13, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Eye Tracking: Fixation Count

    In order to assess the processing of social stimuli, subjects will be presented with a series of human faces of mixed sex and race showing neutral emotions and instructed to visually scan each face. Six regions of interest (ROIs) will be defined for each face stimulus: eyes, nose mouth, forehead, cheeks, and outside the contours of the face. The data will be processed off line for each face stimulus as the total time of fixation inside each of the ROIs. Refers to the number of fixations that occurred on the face of the stimulus presented to the participant during the eye-tracking assessment.

    Day 1

  • Eye Tracking: Dwell Duration Time

    Refers to the amount of time that an individual spent looking at the face of the stimulus presented to the participant during the eye-tracking assessment.

    Day 1

  • Social Reward Ball-tossing Task

    Subjects will perform a computerized Social Reward Ball-Tossing Task in which they decide to return the ball to one of three fictional partners. The photos of the partners and their reciprocity in returning the ball to the subject will be manipulated. The number of balls sent to each of the partners will be quantified to assess socially reinforced learning. The result is expressed in number of ball tosses sent to the subject by a fictional player with a positive expression MINUS the number of ball tosses sent to the subject by a fictional player with a negative expression. These measures will be compared between the control subjects, oxytocin and placebo group.

    Day 1

  • Non-Social Reward Ball-tossing Game

    Social reward trials will be interleaved with non-social trials where subjects will play with random geometric shapes or landscape scenes associated with positive and negative non-social rewards. The outcome measure reported herein is the number of ball tosses the subject sends to shape A minus the number of ball tosses sent to shape B.

    Day 1

  • Facial Emotion Identification Task

    The stimuli are 19 standard black and white pictures of faces showing one of six different emotions (happy, sad, angry, surprise, disgusted, ashamed) that were developed by Ekman and Friesen (1976). The pictures are shown for 15 sec, with 10 sec between each face. After the presentation of each face the subject is asked to choose which of the six emotions was displayed. The score on the test is the sum of correct responses. Subjects in the two groups (oxytocin vs. placebo) will be compared.

    Day 1

Study Arms (3)

Oxytocin

EXPERIMENTAL

The intranasal oxytocin intervention will be the administration of OT intranasally at a dose of three 4 IU puffs per nostril for a total dose of 24 IU. Each puff is 0.1ml in volume so the total volume administered will be 0.6 ml intranasally. This dose has been used in a number of other similarly designed challenge studies examining the effects of a single dose of OT (Kirsch et al. 2005; Kosfeld et al. 2005; Guastella et al. 2008a; Guastella et al. 2008b; Rimmele et al. 2009; Andari et al. 2010).

Drug: Oxytocin

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Intranasal placebo The PBO/control will consist of the OT vehicle administered as three puffs in each nostril. Each puff is is 0.1ml in volume so the total volume administered will be 0.6 ml intranasally. Treatment assignment will be by random allocation in blocks of six. Both experimenters and subjects will be blind to the treatment they are receiving.

Drug: Placebo

Healthy Controls

OTHER

Participants who have no psychiatric diagnosis and will be controls for this project. These controls will not receive oxytocin or placebo. They will only receive psychiatric screening interview, MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) assessment, urine drug screen, vision testing, and the three social cognition tasks.

Other: Control

Interventions

OT intervention will be administration of OT intranasally at a dose of three 4 IU puffs per nostril for a total dose of 24 IU. This dose has been used in a number of other similarly designed challenge studies examining the effects of a single dose of OT (Kirsch et al. 2005; Kosfeld et al. 2005; Guastella et al. 2008a; Guastella et al. 2008b; Rimmele et al. 2009; Andari et al. 2010).

Also known as: Syntocinon
Oxytocin

The PBO/control will consist of the OT vehicle only delivered as 3 puffs of saline per nostril for a total of 6 puffs. Each puff contains 0.1 ml in volume, so the total delivered will be 0.6 ml intranasally.

Also known as: Inactive vehicle
Placebo
ControlOTHER

Participants who have no psychiatric diagnosis and will be controls for this project. These controls will NOT receive oxytocin or PBO. They will only receive psychiatric screening interview, MCCB Consensus Cogntive Battery assessment, urine drug screen, vision testing, and the three social cognition tasks.

Healthy Controls

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects must be between 18 and 65 years old at the time of study screening.
  • Subjects must demonstrate adequate decisional capacity, in the judgment of the consenting study staff member, to make a choice about participating in this research study.
  • Subjects must have been psychiatrically and medically stable for 8 weeks prior to consent in the judgment of the Principal Investigator.
  • Subjects must have been maintained on a stable treatment of antipsychotics and/or other concomitant psychotropic treatment for at least 6 weeks prior to consent.
  • Subjects must have no more than a moderate severity rating on hallucinations and unusual thought content as shown by a score of ≤ 4 on the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS).
  • Subjects must be able to validly complete the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), in the judgment of the consenting study staff person.
  • Subjects must have the visual, auditory, and motor capacity to use the computer software in the judgment of the consenting study staff person. Visual acuity must be at least 20/30 corrected.
  • Subjects must have a minimal level of extrapyramidal symptoms as shown by a Simpson-Angus Scale total score of no more than 6.
  • Subjects must have a minimal level of depressive symptoms as shown by a Calgary Depression Scale (CDSS) total score of no more than 10.

You may not qualify if:

  • Female sex
  • History of bipolar disorder
  • Active substance dependence within the prior 30 days (cigarette smoking is allowed)
  • Has had a psychiatric hospitalization in the 8 weeks prior to consent.
  • Suicidal or homicidal ideation in the previous six months
  • Subjects who have answered 'yes' to Question 5 (Active Suicidal Ideation with Specific Plan and Intent) on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale, C-SSRS, or who have answered 'yes' to any of the suicide-related behaviors (actual attempt, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, preparatory act or behavior) on the C-SSRS "Suicidal Behavior" portion shall be excluded from the study if ideation or behavior occurred within one month of consent. Subjects excluded for this reason will be referred for appropriate treatment.
  • History of mental retardation or pervasive developmental disorder
  • History of neurological disorder (e.g., traumatic brain injury, seizure disorder, Parkinson's Disease, dementia), loss of consciousness for more than 10 minutes due to head trauma, known HIV infection, or AIDS
  • Treatment with a benzodiazepine in the two weeks prior to consent.
  • Control Participants:
  • Male
  • Ages 18-65
  • Female
  • History of a psychotic disorder, or depression requiring medication
  • Active substance abuse or dependence within the prior 30 days
  • +9 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Atlanta VA Medical Center

Decatur, Georgia, 30033, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Young LJ, Murphy Young AZ, Hammock EA. Anatomy and neurochemistry of the pair bond. J Comp Neurol. 2005 Dec 5;493(1):51-7. doi: 10.1002/cne.20771.

    PMID: 16255009BACKGROUND
  • Andari E, Duhamel JR, Zalla T, Herbrecht E, Leboyer M, Sirigu A. Promoting social behavior with oxytocin in high-functioning autism spectrum disorders. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 2;107(9):4389-94. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910249107. Epub 2010 Feb 16.

    PMID: 20160081BACKGROUND
  • Guastella AJ, Mitchell PB, Dadds MR. Oxytocin increases gaze to the eye region of human faces. Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Jan 1;63(1):3-5. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.06.026. Epub 2007 Sep 21.

    PMID: 17888410BACKGROUND
  • Mueser KT, Doonan R, Penn DL, Blanchard JJ, Bellack AS, Nishith P, DeLeon J. Emotion recognition and social competence in chronic schizophrenia. J Abnorm Psychol. 1996 May;105(2):271-5. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.105.2.271.

    PMID: 8723008BACKGROUND
  • Andari E, Massa NM, Fargotstein MD, Taylor NB, Halverson DM, Owens AV, Currin DL, Bhattacharya A, Gitman D, Cuthbert BC, Young LJ, Duncan EJ. Effects of Oxytocin on Emotion Recognition in Schizophrenia: A Randomized Double-Blind Pilot Study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021 Mar-Apr 01;41(2):103-113. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001367.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Interventions

Oxytocin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pituitary Hormones, PosteriorPituitary HormonesPeptide HormonesHormonesHormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone AntagonistsPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Erica Duncan
Organization
Emory University

Study Officials

  • Erica J Duncan, MD

    Emory University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2012

First Posted

April 2, 2012

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion

March 15, 2017

Study Completion

March 15, 2017

Last Updated

September 4, 2019

Results First Posted

September 4, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations