NCT01562483

Brief Summary

Persistent postsurgical abdominal pain (PPAP) is a very difficult to treat pain. This pain can persist for months or even years and significantly diminishes quality of life. The exact underlying cause for this pain persistence is still unclear, which makes its treatment still a challenge. The promising analgesic effects of Δ9-THC in previous research, plus the improved bioavailability of Namisol® in comparison with previous Δ9-THC substances form the basis of the present research proposal. The current study aims to investigate the analgesic efficacy of Namisol® as add-on analgesic during a long-term treatment (52 days) of persistent postsurgical abdominal pain.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2012

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 7, 2012

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 23, 2012

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2012

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

October 28, 2014

Status Verified

October 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

March 7, 2012

Last Update Submit

October 27, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

postsurgical painabdominal painvisceral painchronic pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Average VAS pain

    The primary outcome measure is defined as the reduction in average VAS pain scores at the end of the study (day 50-52) compared to the pre-treatment level between the Namisol® and placebo group, measured by a Visual Analoge Scale (VAS) in a pain diary.

    Baseline versus day 52

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Electroencephalogram (EEG)

    Baseline versus day 52

  • Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)

    Baseline versus day 15 and day 52

  • Depression and (pain related) anxiety

    Baseline versus day 52

  • Pharmacodynamic parameters

    Baseline versus day 15 and day 52

  • Safety parameters

    Baseline until follow-up (day 59-61)

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (namisol)

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Tetrahydrocannabinol

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR
Drug: Placebo

Interventions

The add-on treatment consists of two phases: a step-up phase (day 1-5: 3 mg TID; day 6-10: 5 mg TID), and a stable dose phase (day 11-52: 8 mg TID). The dosage may be tapered to at least 5 mg TID, when 8 mg is not tolerated.

Also known as: Namisol, Dronabinol
delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (namisol)

Identical to the Namisol arm.

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Pain should have developed after a surgical procedure
  • Pain duration exceeding 3 months, and average NRS≥3
  • Stable doses intake of analgesics for the past 2 months
  • The patient has been informed about the study, understood the information and signed the informed consent form

You may not qualify if:

  • Diagnosed irritated bowel syndrome (IBS) or chronic pancreatitis
  • Patient took cannabinoids on a regular basis for at least one year
  • Patient does not feel a pinprick test in the lower extremities
  • Patient has a body mass index (BMI) above 36,0 kg/m2
  • Patient suffers from serious painful conditions other than chronic pancreatitis
  • Patient has a significant medical disorder that may interfere with the study or may pose a risk for the patient
  • Patient uses any kind of concomitant medication that may interfere with the study or may pose a risk for the patient
  • Patient does not tolerate oral intake of medication or liquids, or is refrained from oral intake because of medical reasons
  • Patient demonstrates clinical relevant deviations in the electrocardiogram (ECG)
  • Patient has an actual moderate to severe renal impairment
  • Patient has an actual moderate to severe hepatic impairment
  • Patient has a presence or history of major psychiatric illness
  • Patient has experienced an epileptic seizure in the past
  • Patient demonstrates clinically significant laboratory abnormalities
  • Patient demonstrates a positive urine drug screen for THC, cocaine, MDMA, and amphetamines
  • +8 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre

Nijmegen, 6500 HB, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • de Vries M, van Rijckevorsel DCM, Vissers KCP, Wilder-Smith OHG, van Goor H; Pain and Nociception Neuroscience Research Group. Tetrahydrocannabinol Does Not Reduce Pain in Patients With Chronic Abdominal Pain in a Phase 2 Placebo-controlled Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jul;15(7):1079-1086.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.09.147. Epub 2016 Oct 5.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, PostoperativeAbdominal PainChronic PainVisceral Pain

Interventions

Dronabinol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsSigns and Symptoms, DigestiveNociceptive Pain

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CannabinoidsTerpenesHydrocarbonsOrganic Chemicals

Study Officials

  • Harry van Goor, MD, PhD

    Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, department of surgery

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2012

First Posted

March 23, 2012

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion

June 1, 2014

Study Completion

June 1, 2014

Last Updated

October 28, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-10

Locations