NCT00932737

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this pilot study is to assess effects of Hyoscine Butylbromide (HBB) 20 mg in comparison to placebo, when used as needed, as measured by the subject's assessment of intensity of abdominal pain associated with cramping (APC) in the treatment of two episodes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
197

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2009

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

19 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 9, 2009

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 17, 2009

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 3, 2009

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 8, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 8, 2010

Completed
12.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 3, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

May 3, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

June 17, 2009

Results QC Date

April 6, 2022

Last Update Submit

April 6, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (13)

  • Change From Baseline in Intensity of Abdominal Pain Associated With Cramping Following Treatment Based on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in Episode 1

    The intensity of Abdominal pain associated with cramping was rated on an 11-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).

    At baseline (prior to intake of first tablet of study medication in episode 1) until 4 hours thereafter or until the patient had responded that their pain was absent, up to 4 hours

  • Change From Baseline in Intensity of Abdominal Pain Associated With Cramping Following Treatment Based on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in Episode 2

    The intensity of Abdominal pain associated with cramping was rated on an 11-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).

    At baseline (prior to intake of first tablet of study medication in episode 2) until 4 hours thereafter or until the patient had responded that their pain was absent, up to 4 hours.

  • Area Under the Curve (AUC) Calculated From the Responses to the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Scores in Episode 1

    The intensity of Abdominal pain associated with cramping was rated on an 11-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).

    At baseline (prior to intake of first tablet of study medication for episode 1) and 15 minutes(min), 30min, 45min, 1 hour(h), 1h30min, 2h, 2h30min, 3h, 3h30min, and 4h thereafter.

  • Area Under the Curve (AUC) Calculated From the Responses to the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Scores in Episode 2

    The intensity of Abdominal pain associated with cramping was rated on an 11-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).

    At baseline (prior to intake of first tablet of study medication for episode 2) and 15 minutes(min), 30min, 45min, 1 hour(h), 1h30min, 2h, 2h30min, 3h, 3h30min, and 4h thereafter.

  • Percentage of Participants With Response of "no Pain" Based on Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in Episode 1

    The intensity of Abdominal pain associated with cramping was rated on an 11-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Responses of "no pain" (NPRS = 0) based on the 0 to 10 point NPRS scale were summarized.

    At 4 hours after intake of first tablet of study medication in episode 1

  • Percentage of Participants With Response of no Pain Based on Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in Episode 2

    The intensity of Abdominal pain associated with cramping was rated on an 11-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Responses of "no pain" (NPRS = 0) based on the 0 to 10 point NPRS scale were summarized.

    At 4 hours after intake of first tablet of study medication in episode 2

  • Percentage of Participants With Response Based on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) of "Much Better" in Episode 1

    At episode 1, after the intake of first tablet of study medication, the patient then responded to the question of "Compared to just before you took the first tablet of study medication, how would you rate your abdominal pain associated with cramping now?" based on the Patient global impression of change (PGI-C), using the available responses: "Much better", "Somewhat better", "A little better", "No change", "A little worse", and "Somewhat worse".

    At 4 hours after intake of first tablet of study medication in episode 1

  • Percentage of Participants With Response Based on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) of "Much Better" in Episode 2

    At episode 2, after the intake of first tablet of study medication, the patient then responded to the question of "Compared to just before you took the first tablet of study medication, how would you rate your abdominal pain associated with cramping now?" based on the Patient global impression of change (PGI-C), using the available responses: "Much better", "Somewhat better", "A little better", "No change", "A little worse", and "Somewhat worse".

    At 4 hours after intake of first tablet of study medication in episode 2

  • Percentage of Participants With Response Based on the 4-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) of "Very Satisfied" in Episode 1

    At episode 1, after the intake of first tablet of study medication, the patient then responded to the question of "Overall, how satisfied were you with the medication in terms of effectiveness for this episode?" based on the 4-point Verbal rating scale (VRS) using the available response: "Very Satisfied", "Satisfied", "Dissatisfied", and "Very Dissatisfied".

    At 4 hours after intake of first tablet of study medication in episode 1

  • Percentage of Participants With Response Based on the 4-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) of "Very Satisfied" in Episode 2

    At episode 2, after the intake of first tablet of study medication, the patient then responded to the question of "Overall, how satisfied were you with the medication in terms of effectiveness for this episode?" based on the 4-point Verbal rating scale (VRS) using the available response: "Very Satisfied", "Satisfied", "Dissatisfied", and "Very Dissatisfied".

    At 4 hours after intake of first tablet of study medication in episode 2

  • Time to Relief in Episode 1

    Time from intake of first tablet of study medication to first response of "no pain" (numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) = 0) in episode 1.

    From intake of first tablet of study medication up to 4 hours thereafter in episode 1

  • Time to Relief in Episode 2

    Time from intake of first tablet of study medication to first response of "no pain" (numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) = 0) in episode 2.

    From intake of first tablet of study medication up to 4 hours thereafter in episode 2

  • Number of Tablets of Study Medication Taken

    Number of tablets of study medication taken in each of the two episode.

    From intake of first tablet of study medication up to 4 hours thereafter in each episode.

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Percentage of Patients With Drug-related Adverse Events

    From the first dose of study medication until 3 days after the last dose for each episode. Up to 8 days.

  • Number of Participants Per Verbal Rating Scale Assessing Participant's Global Assessment of Tolerability in Episode 1

    At 4 hours after intake of first tablet of study medication in episode 1

  • Number of Participants Per Verbal Rating Scale Assessing Participant's Global Assessment of Tolerability in Episode 2

    At 4 hours after intake of first tablet of study medication in episode 2

  • Change From Baseline to End of Study Visit in Systolic Blood Pressure

    At baseline (intake of the first tablet of trial medication in the study) and day 28 (end of study visit)

  • Change From Baseline to End of Study Visit in Diastolic Blood Pressure

    At baseline (intake of the first tablet of trial medication in the study) and day 28 of end of study visit

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Hyoscine butylbromide (HBB) 20mg 1-5 tablets per episode

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patient to receive 1-5 tablets containing 20mg HBB per Abdominal pain associated with cramping (APC) episode

Drug: HBB 20 mg

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

patient to receive a tablet identical to those containing HBB and take 1-5 tablets per episode

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

1-5 tablets per episode

Placebo

Active drug, one to five tablets per episode

Hyoscine butylbromide (HBB) 20mg 1-5 tablets per episode

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • History of recurrent abdominal pain with cramping (APC) for at least three months.
  • Recorded at least two episodes of APC of at least "moderate" intensity (i.e., 5 or above on a 0-10 point scale) lasting one hour in the eDiary during the run-in period.

You may not qualify if:

  • Experiencing daily episode of APC during Run-in period Active gastrointestinal disease during the past 12 months including malignancy, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease or complete or partial bowel obstruction and who have undergone major gastrointestinal surgery with the past 12 months (patients with history of appendectomy, cholecystectomy, bilateral tubal ligation and c-section within past 12 months are allowed in the study).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (19)

202.839.01014 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Westlake Village, California, United States

Location

202.839.01003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Location

202.839.01001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Jupiter, Florida, United States

Location

202.839.01002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Jupiter, Florida, United States

Location

202.839.01017 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Rockford, Illinois, United States

Location

202.839.01005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Location

202.839.01019 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States

Location

202.839.01009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Location

202.839.01004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Location

202.839.01011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Toms River, New Jersey, United States

Location

202.839.01008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Lake Success, New York, United States

Location

202.839.01015 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Location

202.839.01021 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Norman, Oklahoma, United States

Location

202.839.01010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Location

202.839.01013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

202.839.01006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Location

202.839.01012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Location

202.839.01007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Location

202.839.01020 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Abdominal Pain

Interventions

beta-Globins

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and Symptoms, Digestive

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hemoglobin SubunitsHemoglobinsBlood ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsGlobinsHemeproteins

Results Point of Contact

Title
Boehringer Ingelheim Call Center
Organization
Boehringer Ingelheim

Study Officials

  • Boehringer Ingelheim

    Boehringer Ingelheim

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2009

First Posted

July 3, 2009

Study Start

June 9, 2009

Primary Completion

February 8, 2010

Study Completion

February 8, 2010

Last Updated

May 3, 2022

Results First Posted

May 3, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Locations