(Hyoscine Butylbromide) for Abdominal Pain Associated With Cramping on Demand Basis
A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Parallel-group Pilot Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Doses of 20 mg Hyoscine Butylbromide When Used on Demand for the Treatment of Self-reported Functional Abdominal Pain Associated With Cramping
2 other identifiers
interventional
197
1 country
19
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this pilot study is to assess effects of Hyoscine Butylbromide (HBB) 20 mg in comparison to placebo, when used as needed, as measured by the subject's assessment of intensity of abdominal pain associated with cramping (APC) in the treatment of two episodes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jun 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
19 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 9, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 17, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 3, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 8, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 8, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 3, 2022
CompletedMay 3, 2022
April 1, 2022
8 months
June 17, 2009
April 6, 2022
April 6, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (13)
Change From Baseline in Intensity of Abdominal Pain Associated With Cramping Following Treatment Based on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in Episode 1
The intensity of Abdominal pain associated with cramping was rated on an 11-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
At baseline (prior to intake of first tablet of study medication in episode 1) until 4 hours thereafter or until the patient had responded that their pain was absent, up to 4 hours
Change From Baseline in Intensity of Abdominal Pain Associated With Cramping Following Treatment Based on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in Episode 2
The intensity of Abdominal pain associated with cramping was rated on an 11-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
At baseline (prior to intake of first tablet of study medication in episode 2) until 4 hours thereafter or until the patient had responded that their pain was absent, up to 4 hours.
Area Under the Curve (AUC) Calculated From the Responses to the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Scores in Episode 1
The intensity of Abdominal pain associated with cramping was rated on an 11-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
At baseline (prior to intake of first tablet of study medication for episode 1) and 15 minutes(min), 30min, 45min, 1 hour(h), 1h30min, 2h, 2h30min, 3h, 3h30min, and 4h thereafter.
Area Under the Curve (AUC) Calculated From the Responses to the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Scores in Episode 2
The intensity of Abdominal pain associated with cramping was rated on an 11-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
At baseline (prior to intake of first tablet of study medication for episode 2) and 15 minutes(min), 30min, 45min, 1 hour(h), 1h30min, 2h, 2h30min, 3h, 3h30min, and 4h thereafter.
Percentage of Participants With Response of "no Pain" Based on Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in Episode 1
The intensity of Abdominal pain associated with cramping was rated on an 11-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Responses of "no pain" (NPRS = 0) based on the 0 to 10 point NPRS scale were summarized.
At 4 hours after intake of first tablet of study medication in episode 1
Percentage of Participants With Response of no Pain Based on Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in Episode 2
The intensity of Abdominal pain associated with cramping was rated on an 11-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Responses of "no pain" (NPRS = 0) based on the 0 to 10 point NPRS scale were summarized.
At 4 hours after intake of first tablet of study medication in episode 2
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) of "Much Better" in Episode 1
At episode 1, after the intake of first tablet of study medication, the patient then responded to the question of "Compared to just before you took the first tablet of study medication, how would you rate your abdominal pain associated with cramping now?" based on the Patient global impression of change (PGI-C), using the available responses: "Much better", "Somewhat better", "A little better", "No change", "A little worse", and "Somewhat worse".
At 4 hours after intake of first tablet of study medication in episode 1
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) of "Much Better" in Episode 2
At episode 2, after the intake of first tablet of study medication, the patient then responded to the question of "Compared to just before you took the first tablet of study medication, how would you rate your abdominal pain associated with cramping now?" based on the Patient global impression of change (PGI-C), using the available responses: "Much better", "Somewhat better", "A little better", "No change", "A little worse", and "Somewhat worse".
At 4 hours after intake of first tablet of study medication in episode 2
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on the 4-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) of "Very Satisfied" in Episode 1
At episode 1, after the intake of first tablet of study medication, the patient then responded to the question of "Overall, how satisfied were you with the medication in terms of effectiveness for this episode?" based on the 4-point Verbal rating scale (VRS) using the available response: "Very Satisfied", "Satisfied", "Dissatisfied", and "Very Dissatisfied".
At 4 hours after intake of first tablet of study medication in episode 1
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on the 4-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) of "Very Satisfied" in Episode 2
At episode 2, after the intake of first tablet of study medication, the patient then responded to the question of "Overall, how satisfied were you with the medication in terms of effectiveness for this episode?" based on the 4-point Verbal rating scale (VRS) using the available response: "Very Satisfied", "Satisfied", "Dissatisfied", and "Very Dissatisfied".
At 4 hours after intake of first tablet of study medication in episode 2
Time to Relief in Episode 1
Time from intake of first tablet of study medication to first response of "no pain" (numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) = 0) in episode 1.
From intake of first tablet of study medication up to 4 hours thereafter in episode 1
Time to Relief in Episode 2
Time from intake of first tablet of study medication to first response of "no pain" (numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) = 0) in episode 2.
From intake of first tablet of study medication up to 4 hours thereafter in episode 2
Number of Tablets of Study Medication Taken
Number of tablets of study medication taken in each of the two episode.
From intake of first tablet of study medication up to 4 hours thereafter in each episode.
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Percentage of Patients With Drug-related Adverse Events
From the first dose of study medication until 3 days after the last dose for each episode. Up to 8 days.
Number of Participants Per Verbal Rating Scale Assessing Participant's Global Assessment of Tolerability in Episode 1
At 4 hours after intake of first tablet of study medication in episode 1
Number of Participants Per Verbal Rating Scale Assessing Participant's Global Assessment of Tolerability in Episode 2
At 4 hours after intake of first tablet of study medication in episode 2
Change From Baseline to End of Study Visit in Systolic Blood Pressure
At baseline (intake of the first tablet of trial medication in the study) and day 28 (end of study visit)
Change From Baseline to End of Study Visit in Diastolic Blood Pressure
At baseline (intake of the first tablet of trial medication in the study) and day 28 of end of study visit
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Hyoscine butylbromide (HBB) 20mg 1-5 tablets per episode
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient to receive 1-5 tablets containing 20mg HBB per Abdominal pain associated with cramping (APC) episode
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORpatient to receive a tablet identical to those containing HBB and take 1-5 tablets per episode
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- History of recurrent abdominal pain with cramping (APC) for at least three months.
- Recorded at least two episodes of APC of at least "moderate" intensity (i.e., 5 or above on a 0-10 point scale) lasting one hour in the eDiary during the run-in period.
You may not qualify if:
- Experiencing daily episode of APC during Run-in period Active gastrointestinal disease during the past 12 months including malignancy, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease or complete or partial bowel obstruction and who have undergone major gastrointestinal surgery with the past 12 months (patients with history of appendectomy, cholecystectomy, bilateral tubal ligation and c-section within past 12 months are allowed in the study).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (19)
202.839.01014 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Westlake Village, California, United States
202.839.01003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hollywood, Florida, United States
202.839.01001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Jupiter, Florida, United States
202.839.01002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Jupiter, Florida, United States
202.839.01017 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Rockford, Illinois, United States
202.839.01005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
202.839.01019 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States
202.839.01009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
202.839.01004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
202.839.01011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Toms River, New Jersey, United States
202.839.01008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lake Success, New York, United States
202.839.01015 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
202.839.01021 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Norman, Oklahoma, United States
202.839.01010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
202.839.01013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
202.839.01006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, United States
202.839.01012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, United States
202.839.01007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States
202.839.01020 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Boehringer Ingelheim Call Center
- Organization
- Boehringer Ingelheim
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Boehringer Ingelheim
Boehringer Ingelheim
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 17, 2009
First Posted
July 3, 2009
Study Start
June 9, 2009
Primary Completion
February 8, 2010
Study Completion
February 8, 2010
Last Updated
May 3, 2022
Results First Posted
May 3, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04