NCT01561287

Brief Summary

Breast Cancer affects about 1 out of 8 American women. Twenty percent of breast cancer patients undergo some form of breast reconstruction. Several types of reconstructive procedures are available for appropriate patients. A reconstructive sequence consisting of a tissue expander followed by permanent implant placement is a popular choice for many women. In the past several years, acellular dermal matrices (allografts) have been used at the time of tissue expander placement to extend submuscular coverage. Reported benefits include the ability to initially fill the expander to a greater extent, improved control of the inframammary crease, and possible decrease in capsular contracture rate. Potential disadvantages of dermal allografts include foreign body reaction, incomplete tissue integration, or increased infection rates. The latter is especially worrisome, as infection in the setting of a tissue expander often necessitates the removal of the implant and interruption of the reconstructive sequence. There have been a few scattered reports of the use of dermal autografts in implant-based breast reconstruction, but they have not been widely used. Dermal autografts carry the potential benefit of improved tissue integration and lowered complication rates. However, to date there have been no studies which compare acellular dermal allograft matrices to dermal autograft for use in breast reconstruction. The objectives of this study are to compare dermal allograft to dermal autograft with respect to cost, tissue integration, patient satisfaction with scar, and complication profile in patients undergoing mastectomy followed by tissue expander/implant reconstruction.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2011

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2011

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 20, 2012

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 23, 2012

Completed
4.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

May 11, 2016

Status Verified

May 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

4.8 years

First QC Date

March 20, 2012

Last Update Submit

May 10, 2016

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Vascular Ingrowth

    To accurately measure the neovascularization of the implants, the number of blood vessels per 40x high-power field (hpf) will be counted on the slides stained with Factor VIII. Any brown-staining endothelial cell or endothelial-cell cluster, clearly separate from adjacent microvessel and other connective-tissue elements, will be considered a single, countable microvessel. Vessel lumens, although usually present, will not be necessary for a structure to be defined as a microvessel, and red cells will not be used to define a vessel lumen.

    Three months post-surgery

Study Arms (2)

Dermal Autograft

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: Dermal Autograft

AlloDerm

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: AlloDerm

Interventions

Patients in the dermal autograft group will undergo harvest of a dermal autograft from the lower abdomen at the time of mastectomy, which will be used to cover the lower pole of the tissue expander.

Dermal Autograft
AlloDermPROCEDURE

The acellular dermal matrix used in our study is AlloDerm (LifeCell Corp., Branchburg, N.J.) The AlloDerm group will consist of patients without a suitable abdomen for autografting and those who declined the dermal autograft procedure. Patients in the dermal allograft group will have placement of AlloDerm over the lower pole of the tissue expander. Patients with a lower abdominal scar and sufficient abdominal laxity for autograft harvest will be offered this technique.

AlloDerm

Eligibility Criteria

Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Only patients who underwent tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction will be included

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients without the presence of breast cancer or with the presence of the BRCA gene will be excluded

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center

Lexington, Kentucky, 40536, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Interventions

Alloderm

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Officials

  • Brian D Rinker, MD

    University of Kentucky

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor, Department of Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2012

First Posted

March 23, 2012

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion

May 1, 2016

Study Completion

May 1, 2016

Last Updated

May 11, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-05

Locations