A Comparison of Dermal Autograft to AlloDerm in Breast Reconstruction
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Breast Cancer affects about 1 out of 8 American women. Twenty percent of breast cancer patients undergo some form of breast reconstruction. Several types of reconstructive procedures are available for appropriate patients. A reconstructive sequence consisting of a tissue expander followed by permanent implant placement is a popular choice for many women. In the past several years, acellular dermal matrices (allografts) have been used at the time of tissue expander placement to extend submuscular coverage. Reported benefits include the ability to initially fill the expander to a greater extent, improved control of the inframammary crease, and possible decrease in capsular contracture rate. Potential disadvantages of dermal allografts include foreign body reaction, incomplete tissue integration, or increased infection rates. The latter is especially worrisome, as infection in the setting of a tissue expander often necessitates the removal of the implant and interruption of the reconstructive sequence. There have been a few scattered reports of the use of dermal autografts in implant-based breast reconstruction, but they have not been widely used. Dermal autografts carry the potential benefit of improved tissue integration and lowered complication rates. However, to date there have been no studies which compare acellular dermal allograft matrices to dermal autograft for use in breast reconstruction. The objectives of this study are to compare dermal allograft to dermal autograft with respect to cost, tissue integration, patient satisfaction with scar, and complication profile in patients undergoing mastectomy followed by tissue expander/implant reconstruction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jul 2011
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 23, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2016
CompletedMay 11, 2016
May 1, 2016
4.8 years
March 20, 2012
May 10, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Vascular Ingrowth
To accurately measure the neovascularization of the implants, the number of blood vessels per 40x high-power field (hpf) will be counted on the slides stained with Factor VIII. Any brown-staining endothelial cell or endothelial-cell cluster, clearly separate from adjacent microvessel and other connective-tissue elements, will be considered a single, countable microvessel. Vessel lumens, although usually present, will not be necessary for a structure to be defined as a microvessel, and red cells will not be used to define a vessel lumen.
Three months post-surgery
Study Arms (2)
Dermal Autograft
EXPERIMENTALAlloDerm
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Patients in the dermal autograft group will undergo harvest of a dermal autograft from the lower abdomen at the time of mastectomy, which will be used to cover the lower pole of the tissue expander.
The acellular dermal matrix used in our study is AlloDerm (LifeCell Corp., Branchburg, N.J.) The AlloDerm group will consist of patients without a suitable abdomen for autografting and those who declined the dermal autograft procedure. Patients in the dermal allograft group will have placement of AlloDerm over the lower pole of the tissue expander. Patients with a lower abdominal scar and sufficient abdominal laxity for autograft harvest will be offered this technique.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Only patients who underwent tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction will be included
You may not qualify if:
- Patients without the presence of breast cancer or with the presence of the BRCA gene will be excluded
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Brian D Rinker, MD
University of Kentucky
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, Department of Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2012
First Posted
March 23, 2012
Study Start
July 1, 2011
Primary Completion
May 1, 2016
Study Completion
May 1, 2016
Last Updated
May 11, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-05