MINT I Multi- Institutional Neo-adjuvant Therapy MammaPrint Project I
MINT
1 other identifier
interventional
226
1 country
9
Brief Summary
Genomics assays that measure specific gene expression patterns in a patient's primary tumor have become important prognostic tools for breast cancer patients. This study is designed to test the ability of MammaPrint® in combination with TargetPrint®, BluePrint®, and TheraPrint®, as well as traditional pathologic and clinical prognostic factors, to predict responsiveness to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 breast-cancer
Started Oct 2011
Longer than P75 for phase_4 breast-cancer
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 22, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 29, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2017
CompletedJune 28, 2018
June 1, 2018
4.3 years
December 22, 2011
June 26, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Determine the predictive power of chemosensitivity of MammaPrint as measured by pCR.
6-12 months
Determine the predictive power of chemosensitivity of the combination of MammaPrint and BluePrint as measured by pCR.
6-12 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Compare TargetPrint single gene read out of ER, PR and HER2 with local and centralized IHC and/or CISH/FISH assessment of ER, PR and HER2.
Baseline. First study visit.
Identify possible correlations between the TheraPrint Research Gene Panel outcomes and chemoresponsiveness.
6-9 months
Identify and/or validate predictive gene expression profiles of clinical response/resistance to chemotherapy.
6-12 months
Compare the three BluePrint molecular subtype categories with IHC-based subtype classification.
Baseline. First study visit.
Study Arms (2)
HER2 negative patients
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn order to provide some consistency in management and have a treatment policy in place only recommended therapy with several well accepted and presumed equivalent chemotherapy regimens will be used. The proposed neo-adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for HER2 negative patients include: 1. TAC chemotherapy 2. TC chemotherapy 3. Dose Dense AC or FEC100 followed by paclitaxel or docetaxel chemotherapy
Her2 positive patients
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe proposed neo-adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for HER2 negative patients is TCH chemotherapy.
Interventions
Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV day 1, Doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 IV day 1, Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 IV day 1; Cycled every 21 days for 6 cycles
Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV day 1, Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 IV day 1; Cycled every 21 days for 6 cycles
Doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 IV day 1, Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 IV day 1, Cycled every 14 days for 4 cycles, OR 5-Fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 IV day 1, Epirubicin 100 mg/m2 IV day 1, Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 IV day 1; Cycled every 21 days for 3 cycles Followed by Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 by 1 h IV infusion weekly for 12 weeks, OR Docetaxel 100mg/m2 IV day 1 cycled every 21 days for 3 or 4 cycles
Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV day 1, followed by Carboplatin AUC 6 IV day 1; Cycled every 21 days for 6 cycles Trastuzumab initial dose of 4 mg/kg over 90 minute IV infusion, then 2 mg/kg over 30 minute IV infusion weekly for 52 weeks, OR initial dose of 8 mg/kg over 90 minutes IV infusion, then 6 mg/kg over 30-90 minutes IV infusion every three weeks for 52 weeks.
Trastuzumab 4 mg/kg IV for one dose beginning just prior to first dose of paclitaxel. Followed by trastuzumab 2 mk/kg IV weekly for 23 weeks Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 by 1 h IV infusion weekly for 12 wks Followed by 5-Fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 4 Epirubicin 75 mg/m2 IV on day 1 Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 IV on day 1 cycled every 21 days for 4 cycles Trastuzumab 6mg/kg IV every 21 days for 9 cycles to complete 1yr
Doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 IV day 1 Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 IV day 1 (cycled every 14 days for 4 cycles) Followed by paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 by 1 h IV infusion weekly for 12 wks All cycles are with filgrastim support with trastuzumab 2 mg/kg (4 mg/kg loading dose). Following chemotherapy , trastuzumab to continue every 3 weeks at 6 mg/kg for the duration of 1 week.
Doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 IV day 1 Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 IV day 1 Cycled every 14 days for 4 cycles Followed by docetaxel 75-100 mg/m2 by 1 h IV infusion weekly for 12 wks All cycles are with filgrastim support with trastuzumab 6 mg/kg (8 mg/kg loading dose with C1) Pertuzumab 420 mg (840 mg loading dose with C1). Following chemotherapy, trastuzumab to continue every 3 weeks at 6 mg/kg for the duration of 1 week.
Docetaxel 75-100 mg/m2 by 1 h IV infusion Cycled every 21 days for 4 cycles With Trastuzumab 6 mg/kg IV (8 mg/kg IV loading dose) q3W And Pertuzumab 420 mg IV (840 mg IV loading dose) q 3w +/- pegfilgrastim 6 mg sq on day 2-3, Followed by 4 cycles of AC or FEC: AC Doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 IV day 1 Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 IV day 1 Cycled every 14 days for 4 cycles with pegfilgrastim 6 mg sq on day 2 FEC 5-Fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 4 Epirubicin 75 mg/m2 IV on day 1 Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 IV on day 1 cycled every 21 days for 4 cycles In all of the above mentioned regimens docetaxel might be substituted with paclitaxel as paclitaxel is better tolerated but is expected to have the same efficacy as docetaxel.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women with histologically proven invasive breast cancer and no distant metastases and;
- Lymphnode negative and a clinical tumor classification of T2 (≥3.5cm)-T4 or with 1-3 positive lymph nodes and a clinical tumor classification of T2-T4 DCIS or LCIS are allowed in addition to invasive cancer at T2 or T3 level.
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- At least one lesion that can be accurately measured in two dimensions utilizing mammogram, ultrasound, or MRI images to define specific size and validate complete pathologic response.
- Adequate bone marrow reserves (neutrophil count \>1.5 x109 /l and platelet count \>100 x109/l), adequate renal function (serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal) and hepatic function (ALAT, ASAT ≤ 2.5 x upper limit of normal, alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 x upper limit of normal and total bilirubin ≤ 2.0 x upper limit of normal).
- Signed informed consent of the patient
You may not qualify if:
- Any patient with confirmed metastatic disease. Patients with inflammatory breast cancer.
- Tumor sample shipped to Agendia with ≤ 30% tumor cells or that fails Quality Assurance or Quality Control criteria.
- Patients who have had any prior chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or endocrine therapy for the treatment of breast cancer.
- Any serious uncontrolled intercurrent infections, or other serious uncontrolled concomitant disease.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Agendialead
- University of South Floridacollaborator
- University of Miamicollaborator
- Morton Plant Mease Health Carecollaborator
- AdventHealthcollaborator
- Plano Cancer Centercollaborator
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Centercollaborator
- University of Oklahomacollaborator
- University of South Alabamacollaborator
Study Sites (9)
University of South Alabama, Mitchell Cancer Institute
Mobile, Alabama, 36688, United States
Morton Plant Mease Health Care
Clearwater, Florida, 33756, United States
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33124, United States
University of South Florida Breast Cancer Program
Tampa, Florida, 33613, United States
Helen Ellis Memorial Hospital
Tarpon Springs, Florida, 34689, United States
Eastchester Center for Cancer Care
The Bronx, New York, 10469, United States
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43212, United States
University of Oklahoma, Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States
Texas Health, Plano Cancer Institute
Plano, Texas, 75093, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Charles E Cox, MD
University of South Florida
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 22, 2011
First Posted
December 29, 2011
Study Start
October 1, 2011
Primary Completion
February 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2017
Last Updated
June 28, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-06