Intra-operative Digital vs. Standard Mammography
A Comparison of Intra-Operative Digital Specimen Mammography to Standard Specimen Mammography
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A breast biopsy in the operating room may be needed in up to 15% of patients with an abnormality on mammogram. When an abnormality is present but there is no palpable mass, the abnormality must be localized with a wire before going to the operating room. This technique is also used when a breast cancer is present but there is no mass, in order to perform a targeted lumpectomy. Once the abnormality is surgically removed, the specimen with the wire is taken to the breast imaging department for a specimen x-ray to ensure that the targeted abnormality is present within the specimen. If the abnormality is close to the edge of the specimen, additional tissue is often removed. A newer method for evaluating the specimen is to perform imaging in the operating room. Portable digital mammography units are available for this purpose. The Biovision digital specimen mammography system is FDA-approved and currently in use in over 200 centers in the United States. Several studies have shown that intra-operative digital mammography is as accurate as standard specimen mammography and takes less time to perform. It may also decrease the chance of having to go back to the operating room to take more breast tissue after lumpectomy because of cancer cells near teh margin(s) of the specimen on final pathology. Having to go back to the operating room to take more tissue is called a re-excision. The purpose of this study is to compare standard specimen mammography to intra-operative specimen mammography to quantify potential operating room time savings and to determine if the use of intra-operative specimen mammography decreases re-excision rates. We aim to see if intra-operative specimen mammography is more efficient and if it decreases re-excision rates.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 breast-cancer
Started Jan 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 8, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 11, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 24, 2017
CompletedAugust 24, 2017
July 1, 2017
1.9 years
January 8, 2013
June 2, 2017
July 25, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of Operative Time Savings
To compare the overall operative time savings using intra-operative digital mammography compared with standard specimen mammography.
At the time of the procedure (approximately 1 week after randomization)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Assessment of Radiographic and Pathologic Findings
2 years
Study Arms (2)
Intra-operative Mammography
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntra-operative Specimen Mammography
Standard Mammography
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard Specimen Mammography
Interventions
The patient's breast specimen will be imaged in the operating room in an intra-operative imaging device - Biovision SN #30042
There is not an added device associated with this arm.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Newly diagnosed with a breast abnormality undergoing an excisional biopsy with wire localization or newly diagnosed with invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma undergoing a lumpectomy with wire localization
- Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent document
You may not qualify if:
- Recurrent breast cancer
- Palpable masses not requiring wire localization
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michelle Specht, MD
- Organization
- Massachusetts General Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michelle Specht, MD
Massachusetts General Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 8, 2013
First Posted
January 11, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
August 24, 2017
Results First Posted
August 24, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07