NCT01554852

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare a standard chemotherapy regimen of cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone plus thalidomide with a newer regimen of cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone plus lenalidomide with or without carfilzomib. Patients who do not have the best response to their initial treatment may then also be given a combination of cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone plus bortezomib. Patients who are relatively fit may, on their doctor's advice, go on to receive more intensive chemotherapy, supported with a transplant of their own blood cells. This is standard treatment which patients may be offered anyway even if they didn't take part in this study. After maximal response has been achieved with the treatment described above, and as long as the myeloma has not got worse, patients will be treated with either long-term lenalidomide, lenalidomide with vorinostat, or receive no further treatment, with close observation.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
4,420

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 multiple-myeloma

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2010

Longer than P75 for phase_3 multiple-myeloma

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2010

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 21, 2012

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 15, 2012

Completed
9.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2021

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

June 11, 2018

Status Verified

June 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

11.6 years

First QC Date

February 21, 2012

Last Update Submit

June 7, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

myelomalenalidomideRevlimidcyclophosphamidedexamethasonebortezomibVelcadevorinostatZolinzastem cellcarfilzomibKyprolis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Overall survival

    Overall survival for induction chemotherapy comparisons is defined as the time from initial randomisation to the trial to death from any cause or last follow-up. Overall survival for maintenance therapy comparisons is defined from the time of maintenance randomisation.

    Time from initial randomisation to the trial death from any cause or last follow-up

  • Progression-free survival

    Progression-free survival for induction chemotherapy comparisons is defined as the time from initial randomisation to the trial to progression or death from any cause. Patients who do not progress will be censored at the last date they were known to be alive and progression-free. Progression-free survival for maintenance therapy comparisons is defined from the time of maintenance randomisation

    time from initial randomisation to the trial to progression or death from any cause

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Response

    Response will be determined according to the modified international uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma

  • Toxicity

    will be based on adverse events as graded by CTCAE v4.0

Study Arms (2)

Intensive pathway

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The intensive pathway is aimed at younger and fitter patients who will receive the standard dose of chemotherapy. The initial treatments will be followed by high-dose chemotherapy with a stem cell transplant which is generally standard practice. Participants receive one treatment from each following stage in intensive pathway, depending on what they are randomised to (Protocol v6.0): 1. Induction treatment: 1. CRD regimen - cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, dexamethasone 2. CTD regimen - cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone 3. CCRD regimen - carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, dexamethasone 2. Consolidation treatment (depending on response to induction treatment): 1. VCD regimen - bortezomib, cyclosphosphamide, dexamethasone 2. No consolidation treatment 3. High-dose therapy and stem cell transplant 4. Maintenance treatment: 1. Lenalidomide maintenance 2. No maintenance 3. Lenalidomide plus vorinostat maintenance (Protocol v5.0 only)

Drug: Induction (intensive pathway) - cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, & dexamethasone (CRD) regimenDrug: Induction (intensive pathway) - cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, & dexamethasone (CTD) regimenDrug: Induction (intensive pathway) - carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, & dexamethasone (CCRD) regimenDrug: Consolidation (intensive & non-intensive pathways) - bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, & dexamethasone (VCD) regimenDrug: Maintenance (intensive & non-intensive pathways) - lenalidomide maintenanceDrug: Maintenance (intensive & non-intensive pathways - protocol v5.0 only) - lenalidomide plus vorinostat maintenanceDrug: High dose melphalan therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (intensive pathway only)

Non-intensive pathway

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The non-intensive pathway is aimed at participants who are not deemed suitable for the stem cell transplant, and will receive lower doses of some of the drugs. Interventions in each stage of non-intensive pathway (depending on what the participant has been randomised to) - from Protocol v6.0: 1. Induction treatment 1. CRDa regimen - cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, dexamethasone attenuated 2. CTDa regimen - cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone attenuated 2. Consolidation treatment (depending on participant's response to induction treatment): 1. VCD regimen - bortezomib, cyclosphosphamide, dexamethasone 2. No consolidation treatment 3. Maintenance treatment 1. Lenalidomide maintenance 2. No maintenance 3. Lenalidomide plus vorinostat maintenance (\*for participants recruited under Protocol v5.0 only\*)

Drug: Induction (non-intensive pathway) - cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, & dexamethasone attenuated (CRDa) regimenDrug: Induction (non-intensive pathway) - cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, & dexamethasone attenuated (CTDa) regimenDrug: Consolidation (intensive & non-intensive pathways) - bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, & dexamethasone (VCD) regimenDrug: Maintenance (intensive & non-intensive pathways) - lenalidomide maintenanceDrug: Maintenance (intensive & non-intensive pathways - protocol v5.0 only) - lenalidomide plus vorinostat maintenance

Interventions

Days 1 \& 8 - cyclophosphamide 500 mg PO Days 1-21 - lenalidomide 25 mg daily PO Days 1-4 \& 12-15 - dexamethasone 40 mg daily PO This cycle is repeated every 28 days

Also known as: Revlimid (lenalidomide)
Intensive pathway

Days 1,8,15 (i.e. weekly) - cyclophosphamide 500 mg PO Continuously - thalidomide 50 mg hard capsules. Initially 100 mg daily PO for 3 weeks, increasing to 200 mg daily PO Days 1-4 and 12-15 - dexamethasone 40 mg daily PO The cycle is repeated every 21 days

Intensive pathway

Days 1 \& 8 - cyclophosphamide 500 mg PO Days 1 \& 2, 8 \& 9, 15 \& 16 - carfilzomib 20\*/36 mg/m2\*\* IV (\*carfilzomib 20 mg/m2 is only administered on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1; \*\*carfilzomib will be dose capped at a body surface area of 2.2 m2) Days 1-21 - lenalidomide 25 mg daily PO Days 1-4, 8, 9 \& 15, 16 - dexamethasone 40 mg daily PO This cycle is repeated every 28 days

Also known as: Kyprolis (carfilzomib), Revlimid (lenalidomide)
Intensive pathway

Days 1 \& 8 - cyclophosphamide 500 mg PO Days 1-21 - lenalidomide 25 mg daily PO Days 1-4 \& 15-18 - dexamethasone 20 mg daily PO This cycle is repeated every 28 days

Also known as: Revlimid (lenalidomide)
Non-intensive pathway

Days 1, 8, 15, 22 (weekly) - cyclophosphamide 500 mg PO Continuously - thalidomide 50 mg hard capsules; initially 50 mg daily PO for 4 weeks, increasing every 4 weeks by 50 mg increments to 200 mg daily PO Days 1-4 \& 15-18 - dexamethasone 20 mg daily PO This cycle is repeated every 28 days

Non-intensive pathway

Days 1, 4, 8 \& 11 - bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 SC or IV Days 1, 8, 15 - cyclophosphamide 500 mg PO Days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9 \& 11-12 - dexamethasone 20 mg daily PO This cycle is repeated every 21 days

Also known as: Velcade (bortezomib)
Intensive pathwayNon-intensive pathway

Days 1-21 - lenalidomide 10 mg daily PO This cycle is repeated every 28 days

Also known as: Revlimid (lenalidomide)
Intensive pathwayNon-intensive pathway

Days 1-21 - lenalidomide 10 mg daily PO Days 1-7 \& 15-21 - vorinostat 300mg PO This cycle is repeated every 28 days

Also known as: Revlimid (lenalidomide), Zolinza (vorinostat)
Intensive pathwayNon-intensive pathway

High dose melphalan therapy and autologous stem cell transplant to be given as per local practice

Intensive pathway

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 18 years or greater
  • Newly diagnosed as having symptomatic multiple myeloma or non-secretory multiple myeloma
  • Provide written informed consent
  • Women of childbearing potential and male patients whose partner is a woman of child bearing potential must be prepared to use contraception in accordance with (and consent to) the Celgene-approved process for thalidomide and lenalidomide Risk Management and Pregnancy Prevention, or commit to absolute and continuous abstinence
  • Women of child bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test performed by a healthcare professional in accordance with the Celgene-approved process for thalidomide and lenalidomide Risk Management and Pregnancy Prevention

You may not qualify if:

  • Asymptomatic myeloma
  • Solitary plasmacytoma of bone. (Patients with previous solitary plasmacytoma now progressed to symptomatic or non-secretory myeloma are eligible)
  • Extramedullary plasmacytoma (without evidence of myeloma)
  • Previous (\<5 years since diagnosis) or concurrent active malignancies, except surgically-removed basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, treated carcinoma in situ of the breast or cervix, or incidental histologic finding of prostate cancer (TMN stage of T1a or 1b). Patients with remote histories (\>5 years) of other cured malignancies may be entered.
  • Documented diagnosis of Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) that meets International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) criteria for high-risk disease
  • Previous treatment for myeloma, except the following: local radiotherapy to relieve bone pain or spinal cord compression; or prior bisphosphonate treatment; or corticosteroids within the last 3 months
  • Known history of allergy contributable to compounds containing boron or mannitol
  • Grade 2 or greater (NCI criteria) peripheral neuropathy
  • Acute renal failure (unresponsive to up to 72 hours of rehydration, characterised by creatinine \>500µmol/L or urine output \<400 mL/day or requirement for dialysis)
  • Lactating or breastfeeding
  • Patient has active or prior hepatitis C

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

112 sites UK wide

United Kingdom, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Beer SA, Cairns DA, Pawlyn C, Holroyd A, Ferris E, Cook G, Drayson M, Boyd K, Proszek P, Davies FE, de Tute R, Jenner M, Morgan GJ, Owen R, Hubank M, Houlston R, Jackson G, Kaiser MF. Challenging the concept of functional high-risk myeloma through transcriptional and genetic profiling. Blood. 2025 Nov 27;146(22):2670-2680. doi: 10.1182/blood.2025029987.

  • Agbuduwe C, Iqbal G, Cairns D, Menzies T, Dunn J, Gregory W, Kaiser M, Owen R, Pawlyn C, Child JA, Davies F, Morgan GJ, Jackson GH, Drayson MT, Basu S. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of IgD myeloma: experience across UK national trials. Blood Adv. 2022 Sep 13;6(17):5113-5123. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007608.

  • de Tute RM, Pawlyn C, Cairns DA, Davies FE, Menzies T, Rawstron A, Jones JR, Hockaday A, Henderson R, Cook G, Drayson MT, Jenner MW, Kaiser MF, Gregory WM, Morgan GJ, Jackson GH, Owen RG. Minimal Residual Disease After Autologous Stem-Cell Transplant for Patients With Myeloma: Prognostic Significance and the Impact of Lenalidomide Maintenance and Molecular Risk. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 1;40(25):2889-2900. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02228. Epub 2022 Apr 4.

  • Walker BA, Boyle EM, Wardell CP, Murison A, Begum DB, Dahir NM, Proszek PZ, Johnson DC, Kaiser MF, Melchor L, Aronson LI, Scales M, Pawlyn C, Mirabella F, Jones JR, Brioli A, Mikulasova A, Cairns DA, Gregory WM, Quartilho A, Drayson MT, Russell N, Cook G, Jackson GH, Leleu X, Davies FE, Morgan GJ. Mutational Spectrum, Copy Number Changes, and Outcome: Results of a Sequencing Study of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 20;33(33):3911-20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.1503. Epub 2015 Aug 17.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Multiple MyelomaNeoplasms, Plasma Cell

Interventions

Neoadjuvant TherapyCyclophosphamideLenalidomideDexamethasonecone rod homeobox proteinClinical ProtocolsThalidomidecarfilzomibBortezomibMaintenanceVorinostat

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsHemostatic DisordersVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesParaproteinemiasBlood Protein DisordersHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesHemorrhagic DisordersLymphoproliferative DisordersImmunoproliferative DisordersImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Combined Modality TherapyTherapeuticsPhosphoramide MustardsNitrogen Mustard CompoundsMustard CompoundsHydrocarbons, HalogenatedHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsPhosphoramidesOrganophosphorus CompoundsPhthalimidesPhthalic AcidsAcids, CarbocyclicCarboxylic AcidsPiperidonesPiperidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsIsoindolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingPregnadienetriolsPregnadienesPregnanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsSteroids, FluorinatedEpidemiologic Study CharacteristicsHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationBoronic AcidsAcids, NoncarboxylicAcidsInorganic ChemicalsBoron CompoundsPyrazinesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and ServicesAnilidesAmidesAniline CompoundsAminesHydroxamic AcidsHydroxylaminesHydroxy Acids

Study Officials

  • Graham Jackson

    Freeman Health System

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2012

First Posted

March 15, 2012

Study Start

May 1, 2010

Primary Completion

December 1, 2021

Study Completion

December 1, 2022

Last Updated

June 11, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-06

Locations