Study Stopped
The study was terminated because the first Phase 3 did not demonstrate efficacy on the co-primary endpoints. The known safety profile remained unchanged.
Phase 3 IGIV, 10% in Alzheimer´s Disease
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Immune Globulin Intravenous (Human), 10% Solution (IGIV, 10%) for the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
2 other identifiers
interventional
508
8 countries
69
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to provide evidence of efficacy and safety to support the development of IGIV, 10% as a treatment option for patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer´s Disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Jan 2012
69 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 20, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 23, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 2, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 16, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 16, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 31, 2015
CompletedMay 19, 2021
April 1, 2021
1.5 years
January 20, 2012
February 3, 2015
April 30, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline to Month 18 in Cognitive Subscale of the Alzheimer´s Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog)
The ADAS-Cog is a validated psychometric instrument that evaluates memory (word recall, word recognition), attention, reasoning (following commands), language (naming, comprehension), orientation, ideational praxis (placing letter in envelope) and constructional praxis (copying geometric designs). This test was administered by experienced raters certified by Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS) at each site. Scores on the ADAS-Cog range from 0-70 with higher scores indicating greater impairment; hence increases from baseline reflect potential cognitive deterioration.
Baseline to 9 Months (actual time frame)
Change From Baseline to Month 18 in Alzheimer´s Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS)-Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Inventory
The ADCS-ADL scale is a validated tool to assess instrumental and basic activities of daily living based on a 23 item structured interview of the caregiver or qualified study partner. Scores on the ADCS-ADL range from 0-78 with lower scores indicating greater impairment; hence decreases from baseline reflect potential functional deterioration.
Baseline to 9 Months (actual time frame)
Secondary Outcomes (11)
ADCS-Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at 18 Months
Baseline to 9 Months (actual time frame)
Change From Baseline to Month 18 in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)
Baseline to 9 Months (actual time frame)
Change From Baseline to Month 18 in Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Parameters: Rate of Whole Brain Atrophy and Ventricular Enlargement
Baseline to 9 Months (actual time frame)
Change From Baseline to Month 18 in Logsdon Quality of Life in Alzheimer´s Disease (QOL-AD)
Baseline to 9 Months (actual time frame)
Change From Baseline to Month 18 in Impact of Alzheimer´s Disease on Caregiver Questionnaire (IADCQ)
Baseline to 9 Months (actual time frame)
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
IGIV, 10% at high dose (0.4 g/kg)
EXPERIMENTALIGIV, 10% at low dose (0.2 g/kg)
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo control
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Intravenous infusion every 2 weeks over 18 months
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males or females of age 50 to 89 years inclusive at the time of screening
- Written informed consent obtained from either the subject or the subject's legally authorized representative prior to any study-related procedures
- Written informed consent obtained from an able and competent caregiver who is willing to comply with the requirements of the protocol pertaining to him/her, including facilitating the subject's participation in the study
- Diagnosis of Probable Alzheimer´s Disease (AD) according to NINCDS-ADRDA\* 1984 criteria (\* National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke - Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association)
- Dementia of mild to moderate severity (Mini-Mental State Examination \[MMSE\] 16-26 inclusive at the time of screening)
- Neuroimaging (computed tomography \[CT\] or MRI) performed after symptom onset consistent with AD diagnosis
- Willingness to comply with the requirements of the protocol and ability to comply with testing and infusion regimen, including adequate corrected visual acuity and hearing ability
- For at least 12 weeks prior to screening, on stable doses of AD medication(s) approved by local regulatory authorities. Subjects must not be on two acetylcholinesterase inhibitors concurrently.
- Venous access for repeated infusion and phlebotomy
- If receiving psychoactive medications (eg, antidepressants other than monoamine oxidase inhibitors \[MAOIs\] and most tricyclics, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, anticonvulsants, mood stabilizers, etc.), must be on stable doses for at least 6 weeks prior to screening
- For women of childbearing potential, the subject must have a negative pregnancy test at screening and must agree to employ adequate contraceptive measures (eg, birth control pills/patches, intrauterine device, or diaphragm or condom \[for male partner\] with spermicidal jelly or foam) throughout the course of the study
- For subjects with a coronary artery stent, the subject must receive documented medical clearance from an interventional cardiologist stating that the subject is not at increased risk for stent occlusion with immunoglobulin treatment
- For subjects with an endovascular stent, the subject must receive documented medical clearance from a vascular surgeon stating that the subject is not at increased risk for thromboembolic events with immunoglobulin treatment
You may not qualify if:
- Possible AD by NINCDS-ADRDA criteria or non-Alzheimer dementia (eg, vascular dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, frontotemporal dementia, or dementia arising from other diseases or conditions such as Parkinson's disease, vitamin B12 deficiency, thyroid abnormalities)
- Current residence in a skilled nursing facility
- Contraindication to undergoing MRI (eg, pacemaker \[with the exception of an MRI-compatible pacemaker\], severe claustrophobia, ferromagnetic implants such as a metal plate)
- Clinically significant congestive heart failure (eg, New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] Class III/IV symptoms or untreated Class II)
- Current atrial fibrillation of unstable angina (angina at rest) or history of myocardial infarction within the 12 months prior to screening
- Uncontrolled hypertension defined as systolic blood pressure \> 160 mm Hg and/or diastolic \> 100 mm Hg confirmed upon repeated measures
- History of thrombosis and/or thromboembolic disease (central or peripheral) within the 12 months prior to screening
- Known history of procoagulant abnormalities (eg, factor V Leiden, antiphospholipid syndrome, protein S/protein C deficiency, AT III deficiency)
- History of intracerebral hemorrhage within the 5 years prior to screening
- Evidence on MRI of: greater than 4 microhemorrhages (regardless of their anatomical location or diagnostic characterization as "possible" or "definite"), a single area of superficial siderosis, vasogenic edema, a macrohemorrhage, major stroke, prominent white matter disease with a rating score of 3 on the age-related white matter changes (ARWMC) scale from the European Task Force on ARWMC, or multiple lacunae (defined as more than 2 lacunae that are greater than 0.5 mm in size)
- Head trauma with loss of consciousness, contusion, or open head injury within the 12 months prior to screening
- Uncontrolled seizure disorder as defined by two or more breakthrough seizures per year despite adequate antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment
- Modified Hachinski score \> 4 at time of screening
- Subjects with active malignancy or history of malignancy within 5 years prior to screening with the exception of the following: adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, and stable prostate cancer not requiring treatment
- Active autoimmune or neuro-immunologic disorder
- +22 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (69)
Unknown Facility
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Long Beach, California, United States
Unknown Facility
San Diego, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Santa Ana, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Boca Raton, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Delray Beach, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Edgewater, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Orlando, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Decatur, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Springfield, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Paducah, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
Unknown Facility
Olive Branch, Mississippi, United States
Unknown Facility
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Unknown Facility
Berlin, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Chester, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Eatontown, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Summit, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Toms River, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Albany, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Brooklyn, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Latham, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Manhasset, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
New Hyde Park, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Unknown Facility
Austin, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Bennington, Vermont, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Unknown Facility
Woodville South, South Australia, Australia
Unknown Facility
Edegem, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Ghent, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Hasselt, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Leuven, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Roeselare, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Akashi, Japan
Unknown Facility
Akita, Japan
Unknown Facility
Azumino, Japan
Unknown Facility
Chiba, Japan
Unknown Facility
Fukui, Japan
Unknown Facility
Kyoto, Japan
Unknown Facility
Niigata, Japan
Unknown Facility
Osaka, Japan
Unknown Facility
Saga, Japan
Unknown Facility
Tokushima, Japan
Unknown Facility
Tokyo, Japan
Unknown Facility
Lublin, Poland
Unknown Facility
Ścinawa, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Barakaldo, Vizcaya, Spain
Unknown Facility
Barcelona, Spain
Unknown Facility
Madrid, Spain
Unknown Facility
Valencia, Spain
Unknown Facility
Uckfield, East Sussex, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Bath, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Brentford, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Brighton, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Glasgow, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The primary and secondary outcome measures were originally planned to be assessed at 18 months. However, as the study was terminated early, an analysis was completed at 9 months instead, in a subset of subjects who had received 9 months of treatment.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Shire
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Study Director
Takeda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 20, 2012
First Posted
February 2, 2012
Study Start
January 23, 2012
Primary Completion
July 16, 2013
Study Completion
July 16, 2013
Last Updated
May 19, 2021
Results First Posted
March 31, 2015
Record last verified: 2021-04