NCT01510652

Brief Summary

This investigation is designed with the hypothesis that using a quadripolar left ventricular lead results in less interventions when dealing with high pacing thresholds and Phrenic Nerve Stimulation (PNS), both at implant and during follow-up, compared to standard bipolar left ventricular leads.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,078

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2011

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
13 countries

64 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2011

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 30, 2011

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 16, 2012

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2014

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 23, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

February 15, 2019

Status Verified

January 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

November 30, 2011

Results QC Date

August 14, 2015

Last Update Submit

January 31, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Cardiac Resynchronization therapy,Heart Failure,Left Ventricular Lead,Quadripolar Left ventricular Lead,Phrenic Nerve Stimulation,Intra and post operative related complications

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Lead Performance

    Percentage of patients with freedom from event (intra- and post-operative). Intra-operative events were defined as: need to use more than 1 left ventricular lead, need to change lead implant position, use of any device to actively fixate the lead, unsuccessful implant, due to phrenic nerve stimulation, high pacing threshold or lead instability. Post-operative events were defined as any left ventricular lead related serious adverse device effect and CRT switched off.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Percentage of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Responders

    Baseline and 6 months

  • Implant Duration

    Total duration of the implant procedure reported at the end of the procedure

Study Arms (2)

Quad Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in the Quad group will be implanted with St. Jude Medical (SJM) quadripolar Left Ventricular (LV) lead Quartet

Device: Quad Group

BiP Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in the BiP Group will be implanted with a standard (regulatory approved and commercially available) bipolar left ventricular lead from other companies (non St. Jude Medical leads)

Procedure: BiP Group

Interventions

BiP GroupPROCEDURE

Implantation of standard Left Ventricular (LV) lead

BiP Group

Implantation of quadripolar Left ventricular (LV) lead Quartet

Quad Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients are indicated for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Defibrillation backup device (CRT-D) implantation, as per current international certified guidelines
  • Patients age is 18 years or greater
  • Patients must indicate their understanding of the study and willingness to participate by signing the appropriate informed consent form
  • Patients must be willing and able to comply with all study requirements

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a life expectancy \<12 months.
  • Patients who are or may potentially be pregnant.
  • Patient has suffered any of the following in the 4 weeks prior to enrolment:
  • Myocardial Infarction (MI)
  • Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG)
  • Unstable Angina Pectoris
  • Patient has primary valvular disease which has not been corrected

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (64)

Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg

Genk, Belgium

Location

Hopital La Citadelle

Liège, Belgium

Location

Foothills Medical Center

Calgary, Canada

Location

Royal Alexandra Hospital

Edmonton, Canada

Location

QE II Health Sciences

Halifax, Canada

Location

Institut de Cardiologie du Quebec - Hopital Laval

Québec, Canada

Location

HSC Heastern Health

St. Johns, Canada

Location

Paijat-Hame Central Hospital

Lahti, Finland

Location

Tampere University Hospital

Tampere, Finland

Location

CHU La Cavale Blanche

Brest, France

Location

CHU Gabriel Montpied

Clermont-Ferrand, France

Location

CHRU Hopital Albert Michallon

Grenoble, France

Location

Hopital Cardiovasculaire et Pneumologique Louis Pradel

Lyon, France

Location

Hopital de la Timone

Marseille, France

Location

Hopital du Nord - CH Bourrely St. Antoine

Marseille, France

Location

CHU Hopital G&R Laennec

Nantes, France

Location

Nouvelles Cliniques Nantaises

Nantes, France

Location

CHRU Hopital de Pontchaillou

Rennes, France

Location

CHRU Hopital Charles Nicolle

Rouen, France

Location

CHU St. Etienne

Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France

Location

Clinique du Tonkin

Villeurbanne, France

Location

Charite Campus Virchow Klinikum

Berlin, Germany

Location

Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin-Marzahn

Berlin, Germany

Location

Stadtische Kliniken Bielefeld

Bielefeld, Germany

Location

Klinikum Coburg

Coburg, Germany

Location

Elisabeth-Krankenhaus

Essen, Germany

Location

Universitatsklinikum Greifswald

Greifswald, Germany

Location

Universitatskliniken des Saarlandes

Homburg, Germany

Location

Universitatsklinikum Leipzig

Leipzig, Germany

Location

Stadtisches Klinikum Ludwigshafen

Ludwigshafen, Germany

Location

Klinikum Ludenscheid

Lüdenscheid, Germany

Location

Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen

Trier, Germany

Location

All India Institute of Medical Sciences

New Delhi, India

Location

Escorts Heart Institute and Research Center

New Delhi, India

Location

Barzilai Medical Center

Ashkelon, Israel

Location

Soroka University Hospital

Beersheba, Israel

Location

Kaplan Medical Center

Rehovot, Israel

Location

Sheba Medical Center

Tel Litwinsky, Israel

Location

Policlinico S. Orsola & Malpighi

Bologna, Italy

Location

Azienda Ospedaliera S.Anna e S.Sebastiano

Caserta, Italy

Location

Azienda Ospedaliera Mater Domini

Catanzaro, Italy

Location

Ospedale Vito Fazzi

Lecce, Italy

Location

Ospedale Maggiore della Carità

Novara, Italy

Location

Policlinico Casilino

Rome, Italy

Location

Ospedale SS. Annunziata

Taranto, Italy

Location

Azienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera Molinette S. Giovanni Battista

Torino, Italy

Location

Ospedale Civile Maggiore Verona Borgo Trento

Verona, Italy

Location

Amphia Hospital

Breda, Netherlands

Location

Medisch Spectrum Twente

Enschede, Netherlands

Location

Haga Ziekenhuis

The Hague, Netherlands

Location

MC Haaglanden

The Hague, Netherlands

Location

Slaskie Centrum Chorob Serca

Zabrze, Poland

Location

Hospital de Basurto

Bilbao, Spain

Location

Hospital Ramon y Cajal

Madrid, Spain

Location

Hospital Universitari La Fe

Valencia, Spain

Location

Basel University Hospital

Basel, Switzerland

Location

Hopital Cantonal Universitaire de Geneva

Geneva, Switzerland

Location

Fondazione Cardiocentro Ticino

Lugano, Switzerland

Location

Universitaets Spital Zuerich

Zurich, Switzerland

Location

Queen Elizabeth Hospital

Birmingham, United Kingdom

Location

Royal Bournemouth Hospital

Bournemouth, United Kingdom

Location

University Hospital of Wales

Cardiff, United Kingdom

Location

St. Thomas Hospital

London, United Kingdom

Location

James Cook University Hospital

Middlesbrough, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Boriani G, Connors S, Kalarus Z, Lemke B, Mullens W, Osca Asensi J, Raatikainen P, Gazzola C, Farazi TG, Leclercq C. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With a Quadripolar Electrode Lead Decreases Complications at 6 Months: Results of the MORE-CRT Randomized Trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 Apr;2(2):212-220. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Nov 11.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart FailurePostoperative Complications

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Limitations and Caveats

Patients were followed for only 6 months, studies with longer follow-up would add to the body of evidence.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Prof. Giuseppe Boriani
Organization
Institute of Cardiology, Univ. of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Study Officials

  • Giuseppe Boriani, Pro.

    Policlinico Universitario S. Orsola e Malpighi, Bologna, Italy

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2011

First Posted

January 16, 2012

Study Start

November 1, 2011

Primary Completion

May 1, 2014

Study Completion

May 1, 2014

Last Updated

February 15, 2019

Results First Posted

October 23, 2015

Record last verified: 2019-01

Locations