Cabazitaxel Compared to Topotecan for the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer
Randomized Phase II Study of Cabazitaxel Versus Topotecan in Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Progressive Disease During or After a First Line Platinum Based Chemotherapy
3 other identifiers
interventional
179
16 countries
58
Brief Summary
Primary Objective: To demonstrate progression free survival (PFS) improvement for cabazitaxel compared to topotecan in participants with sensitive or resistant/refractory small cell lung cancer following a first line platinum based chemotherapy. Secondary Objectives:
- To assess disease progression free rate at 12 weeks
- To assess Response Rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor \[RECIST\] 1.1) and duration of response
- To assess Overall Survival (OS)
- To assess the Safety (National Cancer Institute - Common Toxicity Criteria \[NCI-CTC\] version 4.03)
- To assess the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Mar 2012
58 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 22, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 28, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 13, 2015
CompletedApril 13, 2015
March 1, 2015
2.1 years
December 22, 2011
March 30, 2015
March 30, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of occurrence of the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever came first. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (version 1.1) as: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesion. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm). The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression.
Randomization to first tumor progression/clinical deterioration or death (maximum 7.6 months)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Overall Survival
From randomization to date of death (maximum 15 months)
Progression Free Rate at Week 12
Week 12
Overall Objective Tumor Response Rate
Randomization to disease progression/occurrence (maximum 7.6 months)
Study Arms (2)
Cabazitaxel
EXPERIMENTALTopotecan
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Cabazitaxel 25 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) intravenously (IV) on Day 1 every 3 weeks (21-day cycle) until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression or withdrawal consent.
Topotecan 1.5 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 to Day 5 every 3 weeks (21-Day cycle) until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression or withdrawal consent.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histological/cytological proven locally advanced or metastatic small cell lung cancer with progressive disease during or after first line platinum based chemotherapy
- Male or female greater than or equal to (\>=) 18 years (or country's legal age of majority if greater than \[\>\]18 years)
- Participants with measurable disease, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (version 1.1)
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status less than or equal to (\<=) 1
You may not qualify if:
- Absence of signed and dated Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved participant informed consent form prior to enrollment into the study
- More than one prior chemotherapy regimen. Prior treatment with topotecan or taxanes
- Less than 28 days elapsed from prior treatment with chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery to the time of randomization (Radiotherapy for bone pain palliation is allowed)
- Adverse events (excluding alopecia) from any prior anticancer therapy of grade \>1 (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria \[NCI CTCAE\] v4.03) at the time of randomization
- Uncontrolled Central Nervous System (CNS) metastases: participants with CNS metastases may have previous irradiation, only participants with stable disease or response to irradiation who are without CNS symptoms and on a maximum steroid dose of dexamethasone 8 mg daily or equivalent could be included
- Participants with known leptomeningeal metastases
- History of other, invasive neoplasm requiring ongoing therapy
- Participation in another clinical trial and any concurrent treatment with any investigational drug within 30 days prior to randomization
- Any of the following within 6 months prior to study enrollment: myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina pectoris, coronary/peripheral artery bypass graft, New York Heart Association class III or IV congestive heart failure, stroke or transient ischemic attack
- Any severe acute or chronic medical condition, which could impair the ability of the participant to participate in the study or interfere with interpretation of study results
- Known Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) disease, or active hepatitis B or C (systematic testing was not required)
- Pregnant or breast-feeding woman. Positive serum or urine pregnancy test prior to randomization
- Participant with reproductive potential (M/F) who did not agree to use an accepted and effective method of contraception during the study treatment period and for at least 6 months after the completion of the study treatment. The definition of "effective method of contraception" was based on the investigator's judgment. Effective method of contraception should also be adapted to local regulation
- History of hypersensitivity to polysorbate 80
- Inadequate organ and bone marrow function as evidenced by:
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sanofilead
Study Sites (58)
Investigational Site Number 840007
Muscle Shoals, Alabama, 35661, United States
Investigational Site Number 840005
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114, United States
Investigational Site Number 840006
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756, United States
Investigational Site Number 840003
Middletown, Ohio, 45042, United States
Investigational Site Number 840001
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Investigational Site Number 076001
Porto Alegre, 90610-000, Brazil
Investigational Site Number 124003
Montreal, H3T 1E2, Canada
Investigational Site Number 124002
Oshawa, L1G 2B9, Canada
Investigational Site Number 124004
Rimouski, G5L 5T1, Canada
Investigational Site Number 124001
Toronto, M5G 2M9, Canada
Investigational Site Number 152001
Santiago, 8380456, Chile
Investigational Site Number 152005
Santiago, Chile
Investigational Site Number 250005
Brest, 29609, France
Investigational Site Number 250004
Caen, 14033, France
Investigational Site Number 250006
La Tronche, 38700, France
Investigational Site Number 250002
Lille, 59800, France
Investigational Site Number 250003
Saint-Herblain, 44805, France
Investigational Site Number 250007
Villejuif, 94805, France
Investigational Site Number 276003
Großhansdorf, 22927, Germany
Investigational Site Number 276006
Löwenstein, 74245, Germany
Investigational Site Number 300005
Athens, 11522, Greece
Investigational Site Number 300003
Athens, 11527, Greece
Investigational Site Number 300001
Heraklion, 71110, Greece
Investigational Site Number 300002
Thessaloniki, 54629, Greece
Investigational Site Number 300004
Thessaloniki, 57010, Greece
Investigational Site Number 348001
Budapest, 1121, Hungary
Investigational Site Number 348004
Budapest, 1121, Hungary
Investigational Site Number 348002
Budapest, 1125, Hungary
Investigational Site Number 348003
Törökbálint, 2045, Hungary
Investigational Site Number 380001
Genova, 16132, Italy
Investigational Site Number 380002
Livorno, 57123, Italy
Investigational Site Number 380005
Novara, 28100, Italy
Investigational Site Number 380004
Parma, 43100, Italy
Investigational Site Number 578001
Oslo, 0440, Norway
Investigational Site Number 578003
Stavanger, 4011, Norway
Investigational Site Number 578002
Trondheim, 7006, Norway
Investigational Site Number 616004
Gdansk, 80-952, Poland
Investigational Site Number 616003
Lublin, 20-954, Poland
Investigational Site Number 616002
Poznan, 60-569, Poland
Investigational Site Number 616001
Warsaw, 02-781, Poland
Investigational Site Number 642003
Cluj-Napoca, 400015, Romania
Investigational Site Number 642005
Cluj-Napoca, 400015, Romania
Investigational Site Number 642001
Craiova, 200385, Romania
Investigational Site Number 642002
Timișoara, Romania
Investigational Site Number 643001
Moscow, 115478, Russia
Investigational Site Number 643005
Saint Petersburg, 197758, Russia
Investigational Site Number 643006
Tula, 300053, Russia
Investigational Site Number 643003
Yaroslavl, 150054, Russia
Investigational Site Number 410001
Seoul, 120-752, South Korea
Investigational Site Number 410003
Seoul, 135-710, South Korea
Investigational Site Number 410002
Seoul, 138-736, South Korea
Investigational Site Number 724002
Badalona, 08916, Spain
Investigational Site Number 724004
Barcelona, 08035, Spain
Investigational Site Number 724005
Málaga, 29010, Spain
Investigational Site Number 724001
Valencia, 46026, Spain
Investigational Site Number 804002
Dnipropetrovsk, 49102, Ukraine
Investigational Site Number 804004
Donetsk, 83092, Ukraine
Investigational Site Number 804001
Lviv, 70031, Ukraine
Related Publications (2)
Beaumont H, Evans TL, Klifa C, Guermazi A, Hong SR, Chadjaa M, Monostori Z. Discrepancies of assessments in a RECIST 1.1 phase II clinical trial - association between adjudication rate and variability in images and tumors selection. Cancer Imaging. 2018 Dec 11;18(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40644-018-0186-0.
PMID: 30537991DERIVEDEvans TL, Cho BC, Udud K, Fischer JR, Shepherd FA, Martinez P, Ramlau R, Syrigos KN, Shen L, Chadjaa M, Wolf M. Cabazitaxel Versus Topotecan in Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Progressive Disease During or After First-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy. J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Aug;10(8):1221-8. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000588.
PMID: 26200278DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Trial Transparency Team
- Organization
- Sanofi
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Clinical Sciences & Operations
Sanofi
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 22, 2011
First Posted
December 28, 2011
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
April 1, 2014
Study Completion
April 1, 2014
Last Updated
April 13, 2015
Results First Posted
April 13, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-03