The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV
BIF IV
How Should Coronary Artery Stenoses With Significant Side Branch be Stented? A Strategy of Stenting Both Main Vessel and Side Branch Compared to a Strategy of Stenting the Main Vessel and Only Stenting the Side Branch if Necessary.
1 other identifier
interventional
450
1 country
1
Brief Summary
How should coronary artery stenoses with significant side branch be stented? A strategy of stenting both main vessel and side branch compared to a strategy of stenting the main vessel and only stenting the side branch if necessary. The 2-stent strategy is superior to the 1-stent strategy regarding occurrence of cardiac death, non-procedure related myocardial infarction and re-revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
Started Dec 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 19, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 21, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2026
CompletedJanuary 2, 2026
December 1, 2025
4 years
December 19, 2011
December 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Combined endpoint of: Cardiac death, non-index procedure related myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularisation
After 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
MACE (cardiac death, non-index procedure related myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis or target lesion revasculation)
During admission, after 1, 24, 36 and 60 months.
Cardiac death.
During the admission, after 1, 6, 24, 36 and 60 months.
Non-index procedure related myocardial infarction during the admission.
After 1, 6, 24, 36 and 60 months.
Stent thrombosis.
During admission, after 1, 6, 24, 36 and 60 months.
Total mortality
During admission, after 1, 6, 24, 36 and 60 months and 10 years.
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
"No side branch treatment" group
EXPERIMENTALImplantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion
"Stenting of main vessel and side branch" group
EXPERIMENTALImplantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion
Interventions
Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion with no side branch treatment
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Stable or unstable angina pectoris or silent angina pectoris.
- Genuine bifurcation lesion ( Medina type 1,1,1 or 1,0,1 or 0,1,1)
- Lesion of "LAD/diagonal", "Cx/obtuse marginal", "RCA-PDA/posterolateral branch" or "LM/Cx/LAD".
- Diameter of main vessel by visual estimate \>3.0 mm.
- Diameter of side branch by visual estimate \>2.75 mm.
- Signed informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- ST-elevation infarction within 24 hours.
- Side branch lesion length \>15 mm.
- Expected survival \< 1 year.
- S-creatinine \>200 µmol/l.
- Allergy to Aspirin, Clopidogrel or Ticlopidine.
- Allergy to Sirolimus.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Johnson & Johnsoncollaborator
- Evald Hoej Christiansenlead
Study Sites (1)
Aarhus University Hospital
Skejby, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark
Related Publications (1)
Kumsars I, Holm NR, Niemela M, Erglis A, Kervinen K, Christiansen EH, Maeng M, Dombrovskis A, Abraitis V, Kibarskis A, Trovik T, Latkovskis G, Sondore D, Narbute I, Terkelsen CJ, Eskola M, Romppanen H, Laine M, Jensen LO, Pietila M, Gunnes P, Hebsgaard L, Frobert O, Calais F, Hartikainen J, Aaroe J, Ravkilde J, Engstrom T, Steigen TK, Thuesen L, Lassen JF; Nordic Baltic bifurcation study group. Randomised comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV. Open Heart. 2020 Jan 19;7(1):e000947. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000947. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32076558DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Niels R Holm, MD
MD
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 19, 2011
First Posted
December 21, 2011
Study Start
December 1, 2008
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
January 1, 2026
Last Updated
January 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12