Comparison of One-stop Hybrid Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for the Treatment of Multi-vessel Disease
Comparison of "One-stop" Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for the Treatment of Multi-vessel Coronary Artery Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
480
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The "one-stop" hybrid coronary revascularization combines minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) and PCI to be performed in the hybrid operating suite, an enhanced operating room equipped with radiographic capability. This study is to compare 1-year clinical outcomes of "one-stop" hybrid coronary revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in selected patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 17, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedDecember 21, 2009
December 1, 2009
3 years
December 17, 2009
December 18, 2009
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Composite of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) including death, myocardial infarction, stroke and/or repeat revascularization.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Overall MACCE rate.
30 days after procedure and 2 years after enrollment
Cardiac death.
30 days after procedure, 1 and 2 years after enrollment
Documented myocardial infarction.
30 days after procedure, 1 and 2 years after enrollment
Target lesion revascularization.
30 days after procedure, 1 and 2 years after enrollment
Recurrence of Angina.
1 and 2 years after enrollment
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
One-stop hybrid coronary revasularization
EXPERIMENTALPercutaneous Coronary Intervention; Coronary Artery Bypass
PCI with stenting
ACTIVE COMPARATORPercutaneous Coronary Intervention
Interventions
MIDCAB with no associated or concomitant surgical procedures, using partial ministernotomy, without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cardioplegia. PCI with drug eluting stents (DES) performed by cardiologists on the non-LAD lesions in the same operating suite immediately following MIDCAB. Device: Polymer-based Sirolimus-Eluting Stents (SES).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Two- or three-vessel disease, left main disease, or LM equivalent with 2 or 3-vessel disease (left anterior descending \[LAD\], left circumflex \[LCX\], right coronary artery \[RCA\] territory)
- Denovo lesions of LAD , with obstruction \>=70%, especially chronic totally occlusion (CTO), severe calcification or bifurcation lesion of the LM;
- Angiographic characteristics of non-LAD lesion(s) amiable to PCI/stenting;
- Chronic stable or unstable angina pectoris of CCS 2 or greater (symptoms of angina and/or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia);
- Evaluated by both cardiac surgeon and cardiologist together.
You may not qualify if:
- Need for emergent CABG;
- Prior CABG;
- Prior PCI with stenting within 6 months of study entry;
- Stroke with 6 months of study entry;
- Overt congestive heart failure;
- Need for a concomitant operation (i.e. valve repair or replacement, Maze surgery);
- Hemodynamic instability;
- Situations in which complete revascularization is not possible served;
- Allergy to radiographic contrast, aspirin or clopidogrel.
- Contradictions to PCI: Occluded coronary vessels, PVD, Unable to achieve access, Fresh thrombus, Vessels \<1.5mm; Intolerance to aspirin or both clopidogrel and ticlopidine;
- Cannot undergo either CABG or PCI/DES because of a coexisting medical condition
- History of significant bleeding; Significant leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, or known bleeding diathesis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Cardiovascular Institute & Fuwai Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100037, China
Institute of cardiovascular diseases & Fuwai hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100037, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Shengshou Hu, M.D.
China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 17, 2009
First Posted
December 18, 2009
Study Start
December 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
December 21, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-12