Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan Medoxomil in African American Participants With Essential Hypertension
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TAK-491 in Black Subjects With Essential Hypertension
2 other identifiers
interventional
413
2 countries
64
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of azilsartan medoxomil compared to placebo, once daily (QD), in African-American participants with essential hypertension.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 hypertension
Started Oct 2007
64 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 27, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 11, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 19, 2011
CompletedApril 19, 2011
March 1, 2011
1.5 years
December 27, 2007
March 24, 2011
March 24, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in the 24-hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
The change in 24-hour mean systolic blood pressure measured at week 6 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The 24-hour mean is the average of all measurements recorded for 24 hours after dosing.
Baseline and Week 6.
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Change From Baseline in Mean Trough Clinic Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure
Baseline and Week 6.
Change From Baseline in the 24-hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
Baseline and Week 6.
Change From Baseline in Mean Trough Clinic Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure
Baseline and Week 6.
Change From Baseline in Daytime (6am to 10 pm) Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
Baseline and Week 6.
Change From Baseline in Daytime (6am to 10 pm) Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
Baseline and Week 6.
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD
EXPERIMENTALAzilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo QD
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 6 weeks.
Azilsartan medoxomil placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 6 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The participant has essential hypertension (defined as sitting trough clinic systolic blood pressure between 150 and 180 mm Hg, inclusive at Day -1) and 24-hour mean systolic blood pressure 130-170 mm Hg, inclusive, at Day 1.
- Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must agree to use adequate contraception, and can neither be pregnant nor lactating from Screening throughout the duration of the study.
- Willing to discontinue current antihypertensive medication.
You may not qualify if:
- Has sitting trough clinic diastolic blood pressure greater than 114 mm Hg.
- Baseline 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitor reading of insufficient quality.
- Hypersensitive to angiotensin II receptor blockers.
- History of myocardial infarction, heart failure, unstable angina, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, hypertensive encephalopathy, cerebrovascular accident, or transient ischemic attack.
- Clinically significant cardiac conduction defects.
- Hemodynamically significant left ventricular outflow obstruction due to aortic valvular disease.
- Secondary hypertension of any etiology.
- Non-compliant with study medication during run-in period.
- Severe renal dysfunction or disease (based on calculated creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) at Screening.
- Known or suspected unilateral or bilateral renal artery stenosis.
- History of drug abuse or a history of alcohol abuse within the past 2 years.
- Previous history of cancer that has not been in remission for at least 5 years prior to the first dose of study drug.
- Type 1 or poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus.
- Alanine aminotransferase level of greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of normal, active liver disease, or jaundice.
- Hyperkalemia.
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Takedalead
Study Sites (64)
Unknown Facility
Alabaster, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Tempe, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Freemont, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Garden Grove, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Long Beach, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Riverside, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Sacramento, California, United States
Unknown Facility
San Diego, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Whittier, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Newark, Delaware, United States
Unknown Facility
Hialeah, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Hollywood, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Waycross, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Avon, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Elkhart, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Bingham Farms, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Southfield, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Florissant, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Brooklyn, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Hickory, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Salisbury, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Shelby, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Akron, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Centerville, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Willoughby Hills, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Zanesville, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Downingtown, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Anderson, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Friendswood, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Irving, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Katy, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Missouri City, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
North Richland Hills, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Pearland, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Sugarland, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Riverton, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
Arlington, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Burke, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Manassas, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Port Orchard, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Aguas Buenas, Puerto Rico
Unknown Facility
Aibonito, Puerto Rico
Unknown Facility
Loíza, Puerto Rico
Unknown Facility
San Juan, Puerto Rico
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sr. VP, Clinical Science
- Organization
- Takeda Global Research and Development Center, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Executive Medical Director Clinical Science
Takeda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 27, 2007
First Posted
January 11, 2008
Study Start
October 1, 2007
Primary Completion
April 1, 2009
Study Completion
April 1, 2009
Last Updated
April 19, 2011
Results First Posted
April 19, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-03