NCT00696241

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of azilsartan medoxomil, once daily (QD), compared to placebo and olmesartan in participants with essential hypertension.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,275

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 hypertension

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2007

Geographic Reach
3 countries

85 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2007

Completed
1 year until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 10, 2008

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 12, 2008

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2008

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 19, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

July 29, 2011

Status Verified

July 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

June 10, 2008

Results QC Date

March 24, 2011

Last Update Submit

July 27, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

Essential HypertensionCardiovascular DiseaseHigh Blood PressureDrug Therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Baseline in the 24-hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

    The change in 24-hour mean systolic blood pressure measured at week 6 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The 24-hour mean is the average of all measurements recorded for 24 hours after dosing.

    Baseline and Week 6.

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Change From Baseline in Mean Trough Clinic Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure

    Baseline and Week 6.

  • Change From Baseline in the 24-hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

    Baseline and Week 6.

  • Change From Baseline in Mean Trough Clinic Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Baseline and Week 6.

  • Change From Baseline in Daytime (6am to 10 pm) Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

    Baseline and Week 6.

  • Change From Baseline in Daytime (6am to 10 pm) Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

    Baseline and Week 6.

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (5)

Azilsartan Medoxomil 20 mg QD

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan

Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan

Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan

Olmesartan 40 mg QD

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Olmesartan

Placebo QD

PLACEBO COMPARATOR
Drug: Placebo

Interventions

Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg, tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg placebo-matching tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg placebo-matching tablets and olmesartan 40 mg placebo-matching tablets, orally, for up to 6 weeks.

Also known as: TAK-491, Edarbi
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20 mg QD

Olmesartan 40 mg, tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg placebo-matching tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg placebo-matching tablets and azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 6 weeks.

Also known as: Benicar®
Olmesartan 40 mg QD

Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg placebo-matching tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg placebo-matching tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg placebo-matching tablets, and olmesartan 40 mg placebo- matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 6 weeks.

Placebo QD

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Has essential hypertension (defined as sitting trough clinic systolic blood pressure between 150 and 180 mm Hg, inclusive at Day minus 1) and 24-hour mean systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 130 mm Hg and less than or equal to 170 mm Hg at Day 1).
  • Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must agree to use adequate contraception, and can neither be pregnant nor lactating from Screening throughout the duration of the study.
  • The subject is willing to discontinue current antihypertensive medications at the Screening Day minus 21 visit. If the subject is on amlodipine prior to screening, the subject is willing to discontinue this medication at Screening Day minus 28.

You may not qualify if:

  • Sitting trough clinic diastolic blood pressure greater than 114 mm Hg at Day minus 1.
  • Baseline 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitor reading of insufficient quality.
  • History of myocardial infarction, heart failure, unstable angina, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, hypertensive encephalopathy, cerebrovascular accident, or transient ischemic attack.
  • Clinically significant cardiac conduction defects (eg, third degree atrioventricular block, left bundle branch block, sick sinus syndrome, atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter).
  • Hemodynamically significant left ventricular outflow obstruction due to aortic valvular disease.
  • Secondary hypertension of any etiology.
  • Is noncompliant (less than 70% or greater than 130%) with study medication during Placebo Run-In Period.
  • Severe renal dysfunction or disease (based on calculated creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) at Screening.
  • Known or suspected unilateral or bilateral renal artery stenosis.
  • History of drug abuse (defined as illicit drug use) or a history of alcohol abuse (defined as regular or daily consumption of more than 2 alcoholic drinks per day) within the past 2 years.
  • History of cancer that has not been in remission for at least 5 years prior to the first dose of study drug. (This criterion does not apply to those subjects with basal cell or stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the skin).
  • Type 1 or poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (glycosylated hemoglobin greater than 8.0%) at Screening.
  • Alanine aminotransferase level greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of normal, active liver disease, or jaundice at Screening.
  • Hyperkalemia (defined as serum potassium greater than the upper limit of normal per the central laboratory) at Screening.
  • Upper arm circumference less than 24 cm or greater than 42 cm.
  • +4 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (85)

Unknown Facility

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tempe, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tempe, Arkansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Carmichael, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Long Beach, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Los Gatos, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Orangevale, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Sacramento, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Santa Ana, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Spring Valley, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tustin, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Westlake Village, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Farmington, Connecticut, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jupiter, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Melbourne, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Miami, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Naples, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Ocala, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lawrenceville, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Melrose Park, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Naperville, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Round Lake Beach, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Valparaiso, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Erlanger, Kentucky, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Auburn, Maine, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

West Yarmouth, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Benzonia, Michigan, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chelsea, Michigan, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Trenton, New Jersey, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Wildwood Crest, New Jersey, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Orangevale, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Rochester, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Burlington, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Statesville, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Kettering, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lyndhurst, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Marion, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Norman, Oklahoma, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Reading, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Taylors, South Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New Tazewell, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Dallas, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Houston, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lake Jackson, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

North Richland Hills, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Draper, Utah, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Burke, Virginia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina

Location

Unknown Facility

Provincia de Cordoba, Argentina

Location

Unknown Facility

Aguascalientes, Mexico

Location

Unknown Facility

Mexico City, Mexico

Location

Unknown Facility

San Luis Potosí City, Mexico

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • White WB, Weber MA, Sica D, Bakris GL, Perez A, Cao C, Kupfer S. Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension. Hypertension. 2011 Mar;57(3):413-20. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163402. Epub 2011 Jan 31.

  • Bakris GL, Sica D, Weber M, White WB, Roberts A, Perez A, Cao C, Kupfer S. The comparative effects of azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Feb;13(2):81-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00425.x.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

HypertensionEssential HypertensionCardiovascular Diseases

Interventions

azilsartan medoxomilolmesartanazilsartanOlmesartan Medoxomil

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Vascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsTetrazoles

Results Point of Contact

Title
Sr. VP, Clinical Science
Organization
Takeda Global Research and Development Center, Inc.

Study Officials

  • VP Clinical Science Strategy

    Takeda

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2008

First Posted

June 12, 2008

Study Start

June 1, 2007

Primary Completion

October 1, 2008

Study Completion

October 1, 2008

Last Updated

July 29, 2011

Results First Posted

April 19, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-07

Locations