NCT00986193

Brief Summary

This study is a randomised comparison of apical stent valve treatment versus conventional valve surgery in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
72

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2008

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2008

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 25, 2009

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 29, 2009

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2011

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

June 1, 2017

Status Verified

May 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

September 25, 2009

Last Update Submit

May 31, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Aortic Valve StenosisStent ValveBiological Aortic Valve Prosthesis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Death, CVI and/or renal failure requiring any dialysis

    1 month

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Echocardiographic results, valve performance

    1 month with subseguent followup

Study Arms (2)

Conventional Aortic Valve Surgery

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Insertion of a biological valve

Procedure: Conventional Aortic Valve Surgery

Transapical Aortic Valve Implantation

EXPERIMENTAL

Transapical implantation of an Edwards SAPIENtm valve

Procedure: Transapical Aortic Valve Implantation

Interventions

Insertion of a stent valve using catheter-based technique through a mini thoracotomy

Transapical Aortic Valve Implantation

Operation using heart-lung machine, with insertion of a biological artificial heart valve

Conventional Aortic Valve Surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Age75 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Significant aortic valve stenosis (valve area \< 1cm2)
  • Age \> 75 (years Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby)
  • Age \> 80 years (other participating centres)
  • Operable by conventional surgery AND transapical stent valve implantation
  • Expected survival \> 1 year following successful treatment
  • Accept of participation and in follow-up investigations after adequate information
  • Informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Coronary artery disease requiring PCI or CABG
  • Earlier cardiac surgery
  • Myocardial infarction within 24 hours
  • Kidney failure requiring any dialysis
  • Ongoing infection
  • Acute surgery
  • Allergy to ASA or Clopidogrel

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby

Aarhus N, Central Jutland, 8200, Denmark

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve Stenosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Aortic Valve DiseaseHeart Valve DiseasesHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVentricular Outflow Obstruction

Study Officials

  • Evald H Christiansen, MD

    Skejby Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2009

First Posted

September 29, 2009

Study Start

December 1, 2008

Primary Completion

April 1, 2011

Study Completion

April 1, 2016

Last Updated

June 1, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-05

Locations