Sirolimus-eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymer Versus an Everolimus-eluting Stents
A Randomized Comparison of a Sirolimus-eluting Stent With Biodegradable Polymer Versus an Everolimus-eluting Stent With a Durable Polymer for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization
1 other identifier
interventional
2,119
1 country
9
Brief Summary
Coronary artery stents have improved the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery disease. Drug-eluting stents have been shown to decrease neointimal hyperplasia and to reduce the rate of restenosis and target-lesion revascularization as compared to bare-metal stents. Drug-eluting stents consist of a metallic platform and a therapeutic substance that is usually released from a polymer matrix. A previous study utilizing a bioresorbable polymer has demonstrated a favorable safety and efficacy profile in a large-scale clinical trial as compared to a first-generation druf-eluting stent (LEADERS trial). The objective of the study is to compare the safety and efficacy of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a biodegradable polymer with an everolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer in a prospective multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in routine clinical practice.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
Started Feb 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 21, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 29, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2018
CompletedOctober 18, 2018
October 1, 2018
2.3 years
September 21, 2011
October 16, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel Q-wave or non-Q wave myocardial infarction (MI), and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) and emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (25)
Number of patients with target lesion revascularization (TLR)
30 days
Number of patients with target lesion revascularization (TLR)
1 year
Number of patients with target lesion revascularization (TLR)
2 years
Number of patients with target lesion revascularization (TLR)
5 years
Clinically indicated and not clinically indicated target vessel revascularization (TVR)
30 days
- +20 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Orsiro Stent
ACTIVE COMPARATORSirolimus-eluting Stent with a Biodegradable Polymer
Xience Prime Stent
ACTIVE COMPARATOREverolimus-eluting Stent with a Durable Polymer
Interventions
Percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a bioresorbable polymer for coronary artery disease
Percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of an everolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer for coronary artery disease
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 years
- Symptomatic coronary artery disease including patients with chronic stable angina, silent ischemia, and acute coronary syndromes including NSTE-ACS and STE-ACS
- Presence of one or more coronary artery stenoses \>50% in a native coronary artery or a saphenous bypass graft which can be treated with a stent ranging in diameter from 2.25 to 4.0 mm and can be covered with one or multiple stents
- No limitation on the number of treated lesions, and vessels, and lesion length
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Known intolerance to aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, stainless steel, Sirolimus, Everolimus or contrast material
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Currently participating in another trial before reaching first endpoint
- Planned surgery within 6 months of PCI unless dual antiplatelet therapy is maintained throughout the peri-surgical period
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bernlead
- Biotronik AGcollaborator
- University of Berncollaborator
Study Sites (9)
Kantonsspital Aarau
Aarau, 5000, Switzerland
Universitätsklinik Basel
Basel, 4031, Switzerland
Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital
Bern, 3010, Switzerland
HFR Freiburg
Fribourg, 1708, Switzerland
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève
Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
Service de cardiologie CHUV
Lausanne, 1010, Switzerland
Luzerner Kantonsspital
Lucerne, 6004, Switzerland
Kantonsspital St. Gallen
Sankt Gallen, 9007, Switzerland
Stadtspital Triemli
Zurich, 8055, Switzerland
Related Publications (13)
Zbinden R, Piccolo R, Heg D, Roffi M, Kurz DJ, Muller O, Vuilliomenet A, Cook S, Weilenmann D, Kaiser C, Jamshidi P, Franzone A, Eberli F, Juni P, Windecker S, Pilgrim T. Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Mar 15;5(3):e003255. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003255.
PMID: 26979080RESULTFranzone A, Pilgrim T, Heg D, Roffi M, Tuller D, Vuilliomenet A, Muller O, Cook S, Weilenmann D, Kaiser C, Jamshidi P, Raber L, Stortecky S, Wenaweser P, Juni P, Windecker S. Clinical outcomes according to diabetic status in patients treated with biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents: prespecified subgroup analysis of the BIOSCIENCE trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jun;8(6):e002319. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002319.
PMID: 26043895RESULTPilgrim T, Piccolo R, Heg D, Roffi M, Tuller D, Vuilliomenet A, Muller O, Cook S, Weilenmann D, Kaiser C, Jamshidi P, Khattab AA, Taniwaki M, Rigamonti F, Nietlispach F, Blochlinger S, Wenaweser P, Juni P, Windecker S. Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents for primary percutaneous coronary revascularisation of acute myocardial infarction. EuroIntervention. 2016 Dec 10;12(11):e1343-e1354. doi: 10.4244/EIJY15M12_09.
PMID: 26690319RESULTPilgrim T, Heg D, Roffi M, Tuller D, Muller O, Vuilliomenet A, Cook S, Weilenmann D, Kaiser C, Jamshidi P, Fahrni T, Moschovitis A, Noble S, Eberli FR, Wenaweser P, Juni P, Windecker S. Ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent for percutaneous coronary revascularisation (BIOSCIENCE): a randomised, single-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2014 Dec 13;384(9960):2111-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61038-2. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
PMID: 25189359RESULTPilgrim T, Piccolo R, Heg D, Roffi M, Tuller D, Muller O, Moarof I, Siontis GCM, Cook S, Weilenmann D, Kaiser C, Cuculi F, Hunziker L, Eberli FR, Juni P, Windecker S. Ultrathin-strut, biodegradable-polymer, sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin-strut, durable-polymer, everolimus-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary revascularisation: 5-year outcomes of the BIOSCIENCE randomised trial. Lancet. 2018 Sep 1;392(10149):737-746. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31715-X. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
PMID: 30170848RESULTHaner JD, Rohla M, Losdat S, Iglesias JF, Muller O, Eeckhout E, Kurz D, Weilenmann D, Kaiser C, Tapponnier M, Roffi M, Heg D, Windecker S, Pilgrim T. Ultrathin-strut vs thin-strut drug-eluting stents for multi and single-stent lesions: A lesion-level subgroup analysis of 2 randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2023 Sep;263:73-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.05.004. Epub 2023 May 14.
PMID: 37192697DERIVEDIglesias JF, Muller O, Losdat S, Roffi M, Kurz DJ, Weilenmann D, Kaiser C, Heg D, Windecker S, Pilgrim T. Complex primary percutaneous coronary intervention with ultrathin-strut biodegradable versus thin-strut durable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A subgroup analysis from the BIOSTEMI randomized trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Mar;101(4):687-700. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30600. Epub 2023 Feb 19.
PMID: 36807456DERIVEDIglesias JF, Heg D, Roffi M, Degrauwe S, Tuller D, Muller O, Brinkert M, Cook S, Weilenmann D, Kaiser C, Cuculi F, Valgimigli M, Juni P, Windecker S, Pilgrim T. Five-Year Outcomes With Biodegradable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Subgroup Analysis of the BIOSCIENCE Trial. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Jan;34:3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.02.008. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
PMID: 33653633DERIVEDIglesias JF, Heg D, Roffi M, Tuller D, Lanz J, Rigamonti F, Muller O, Moarof I, Cook S, Weilenmann D, Kaiser C, Cuculi F, Valgimigli M, Juni P, Windecker S, Pilgrim T. Five-Year Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 19;8(22):e013607. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013607. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
PMID: 31696762DERIVEDIglesias JF, Heg D, Roffi M, Tuller D, Noble S, Muller O, Moarof I, Cook S, Weilenmann D, Kaiser C, Cuculi F, Haner J, Juni P, Windecker S, Pilgrim T. Long-Term Effect of Ultrathin-Strut Versus Thin-Strut Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Small Vessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Subgroup Analysis of the BIOSCIENCE Randomized Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Aug;12(8):e008024. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008024. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
PMID: 31525083DERIVEDKoskinas KC, Siontis GC, Piccolo R, Franzone A, Haynes A, Rat-Wirtzler J, Silber S, Serruys PW, Pilgrim T, Raber L, Heg D, Juni P, Windecker S. Impact of Diabetic Status on Outcomes After Revascularization With Drug-Eluting Stents in Relation to Coronary Artery Disease Complexity: Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of 6081 Patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb;9(2):e003255. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003255.
PMID: 26823484DERIVEDCampos CM, Costa F, Garcia-Garcia HM, Bourantas C, Suwannasom P, Valgimigli M, Morel MA, Windecker S, Serruys PW. Anatomic characteristics and clinical implications of angiographic coronary thrombus: insights from a patient-level pooled analysis of SYNTAX, RESOLUTE, and LEADERS Trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr;8(4):e002279. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002279.
PMID: 25825008DERIVEDPilgrim T, Roffi M, Tuller D, Muller O, Vuilliomenet A, Cook S, Weilenmann D, Kaiser C, Jamshidi P, Heg D, Juni P, Windecker S. Randomized comparison of biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary revascularization: rationale and design of the BIOSCIENCE trial. Am Heart J. 2014 Sep;168(3):256-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
PMID: 25173535DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephan Windecker
Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2011
First Posted
September 29, 2011
Study Start
February 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
June 1, 2018
Last Updated
October 18, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10