Amsterdam Investigator-initiateD Absorb Strategy All-comers Trial
AIDA
2 other identifiers
interventional
1,845
1 country
5
Brief Summary
To evaluate the efficacy and performance in an all-comers contemporary population of the ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) strategy versus the XIENCE family (XIENCE PRIME or XIENCE Xpedition) everolimus eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of coronary lesions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
Started Aug 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 21, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedJanuary 9, 2019
January 1, 2019
4.3 years
May 10, 2013
January 8, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
The primary composite endpoint is the device-oriented composite of target vessel failure (TVF): * Cardiac death * Myocardial Infarction (MI) (unless clearly attributable to a non target vessel) * Target vessel revascularization
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Device success
1 day
Procedural success
1 day
Target vessel failure (TVF)
30 days, and 1, 3, 4 and 5 years
Target lesion failure
30 days, and 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years
All revascularizations
5 year
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ABSORB BVS™
ACTIVE COMPARATORAbbott Vascular ABSORB Everolimus Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System
XIENCE™
ACTIVE COMPARATORXIENCE PRIME everolimus eluting coronary stent system and the XIENCE Xpedition everolimus eluting coronary stent system
Interventions
Bioresorbable scaffold
Drug eluting metallic stent
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject is an acceptable candidate for treatment with a drug-eluting stent in accordance with the applicable guidelines on percutaneous coronary interventions and the Instructions for Use of the ABSORB BVS strategy and XIENCE family.
- Subject is able to verbally confirm understanding of risks, benefits and treatment alternatives of receiving the ABSORB BVS strategy and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides written informed consent prior to any Clinical Investigation related procedure, as approved by the appropriate Ethics Committee.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject is younger than 18 years of age
- Subject has a true bifurcation lesion where a priori two scaffold/stent strategy is planned.
- Unsuccessful predilation of one or more of the planned lesion to be treated.
- Planned treatment of in-stent restenosis of a previously placed metallic stent.
- Subject has one or more lesion planned to be treated with a scaffold/stent diameter size smaller than 2.5 mm or greater than 4.0 mm.
- Subject has one or more lesion planned to be treated with a stent/scaffold length greater than 70 mm and/or overlapping of four or more scaffolds/stents.
- Subject has known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, both heparin and bivalirudin, antiplatelet medication specified for use in the study (clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor, inclusive), everolimus, poly (L-lactide), poly (DL-lactide), cobalt, chromium, nickel, tungsten, acrylic and fluoro polymers or contrast sensitivity that cannot be adequately pre-medicated.
- Subjects pregnant or nursing subjects and those who plan pregnancy in the period up to 2 years following index procedure. (Female subjects of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test done within 28 days prior to the index procedure and contraception must be used during participation in this trial)
- Subjects with a limited life expectancy less than one year.
- Subjects with factors that impede clinical follow-up (e.g. no fixed abode).
- Subject is already participating in another clinical investigation that has not yet reached its primary endpoint.
- Subject is belonging to a vulnerable population (per investigator's judgment, e.g., subordinate hospital staff or sponsor staff) or subject unable to read or write.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
AMC
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1105 AZ, Netherlands
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Albert Schweitzer Hospital
Dordrecht, Netherlands
TerGooi Hospital
Hilversum, Netherlands
Medical Center Leeuwarden
Leeuwarden, Netherlands
Related Publications (3)
Woudstra P, Grundeken MJ, Kraak RP, Hassell ME, Arkenbout EK, Baan J Jr, Vis MM, Koch KT, Tijssen JG, Piek JJ, de Winter RJ, Henriques JP, Wykrzykowska JJ. Amsterdam Investigator-initiateD Absorb strategy all-comers trial (AIDA trial): a clinical evaluation comparing the efficacy and performance of ABSORB everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold strategy vs the XIENCE family (XIENCE PRIME or XIENCE Xpedition) everolimus-eluting coronary stent strategy in the treatment of coronary lesions in consecutive all-comers: rationale and study design. Am Heart J. 2014 Feb;167(2):133-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.09.017. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
PMID: 24439973BACKGROUNDKerkmeijer LSM, Renkens MPL, Tijssen RYG, Hofma SH, van der Schaaf RJ, Arkenbout EK, Weevers APJD, Garcia-Garcia HM, Kraak R, Piek JJ, Tijssen JGP, Henriques JPS, de Winter RJ, Wykrzykowska JJ. Long-term clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting stents: final five-year results of the AIDA randomised clinical trial. EuroIntervention. 2022 Mar 18;17(16):1340-1347. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00419.
PMID: 34483094DERIVEDWykrzykowska JJ, Kraak RP, Hofma SH, van der Schaaf RJ, Arkenbout EK, IJsselmuiden AJ, Elias J, van Dongen IM, Tijssen RYG, Koch KT, Baan J Jr, Vis MM, de Winter RJ, Piek JJ, Tijssen JGP, Henriques JPS; AIDA Investigators. Bioresorbable Scaffolds versus Metallic Stents in Routine PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 15;376(24):2319-2328. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614954. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
PMID: 28402237DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Joanna Wykrzykowska, MD, PhD
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rob de Winter, MD, PhD
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jan Piek, MD, PhD
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jan Tijssen, PhD
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jose Henriques, MD, PhD
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- J.J. Wykrzykowska, MD, PhD, Coordinating Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2013
First Posted
May 21, 2013
Study Start
August 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
January 9, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01