Gentian Violet Vs. Nystatin Oral Suspension for Treatment of Oropharyngeal Candidiasis
A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized, Assessment-Blinded Clinical Trial to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Gentian Violet Oral Solution to That of Nystatin Oral Suspension for the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Candidiasis in HIV-1 Infected Participants in Non-U.S. Settings
2 other identifiers
interventional
221
7 countries
10
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to see which one of two medicines (topical gentian violet \[GV\] or nystatin oral suspension) was better than the other in treating Oral Candidiasis (OC). This was measured by whether the study participant still had OC or sores in his/her mouth after 14 days of treatment. Also, safety and tolerability of GV and nystatin in the treatment of OC were assessed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jun 2011
Typical duration for phase_3
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 3, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 2, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 16, 2015
CompletedFebruary 16, 2015
February 1, 2015
1.3 years
November 3, 2010
January 6, 2015
February 12, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Clinical Efficacy
The primary endpoint is clinical efficacy defined as cure (absence of lesions) or improvement (a decrease in severity of lesions) after 14 days of treatment. The oral cavity will be split arbitrarily into 6 sites: left lower and upper labial mucosa and buccal mucosa, right lower and upper labial mucosa and buccal mucosa, hard palate, soft palate, tongue (dorsum, lateral, and ventral), and floor of mouth. Severity is scored using a scoring system from 0 to 3 (0 corresponds to absence of lesions, and 3 corresponds to presence of extensive confluent lesions) which leads to a composite severity score ranging from 0 to 18 after adding up the scores from all 6 sites. Complete success is assigned if the composite score after treatment equals to 0. Improved/partial response is assigned if the composite score after treatment is less than the baseline score. The blinded evaluator scores the severity of lesions by examining different lesion characteristics.
After 14 days of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Number of Participant With Symptom
after 14 days of treatment
Quantitative Yeast Colony Counts
At weeks 0, 2, 6
Tolerance
After 14 days of treatment
Number of Participants Who Were Adherent.
After 14 days of treatment
Self-Assessment of General Health
Weeks 0, 6
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Arm A: Topical GV solution
EXPERIMENTALTopical GV 0.00165% solution (5 mL swish and gargle for 1 minute and expectorate \[spit\] 2 times per day \[BID\]) for 14 days
Arm B: Nystatin oral suspension
ACTIVE COMPARATORNystatin oral suspension (5 mL of 100,000 units/mL swish for 1 minute and swallow 4 times per day \[QID\]) for 14 days
Interventions
Participants were administered topical Gentian violet solution, orally, twice daily for 14 days.
Participants were administered Nystatin oral suspension 4 times a day for 14 days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- HIV-1 infection, documented by any licensed rapid HIV test or HIV enzyme or chemiluminescence immunoassay (E/CIA) test kit at any time prior to study entry and confirmed by licensed Western blot or a second antibody test by a method other than the initial rapid HIV and/or E/CIA, or by HIV-1 antigen, plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load.
- Pseudomembranous candidiasis documented by a complete oral exam (i.e., white or yellow spots or plaques with an underlying erythematous base, located in any part of the oral cavity) at the screening visit. Participants with documented angular chelitis and/or erythematous candidiasis without pseudomembranous candidiasis were not eligible to enroll in the study.
- If on an antiretroviral therapy (ART), initiation of regimen at least 12 weeks prior to study entry, and willingness of participant to remain on current ART regimen until the study-defined 14-day treatment period was complete. NOTE: Participants who were not ART-naïve and not on ART were eligible to participate in the study if they did not intend to initiate ART during the study- defined 14-day treatment period.
- CD4+ cell count obtained within 30 days prior to study entry at a DAIDS-approved laboratory.
You may not qualify if:
- Documented or presumptive signs or symptoms of esophageal candidiasis (e.g., dysphagia) during the screening period unless endoscopic examination of the esophagus was performed, and fungal esophagitis were excluded.
- Use of any investigational drug currently or within 30 days prior to study entry. NOTE: For purposes of this study, drugs available under an FDA-authorized expanded access program was NOT considered investigational.
- Concurrent vaginal candidiasis within 21 days prior to study entry.
- Use of inhaled or systemic corticosteroids within 14 days prior to study entry.
- Use of any antifungal agents within 30 days prior to study entry.
- Anticipated need for systemic or oral/topical antifungal agents for other diagnoses within the study-defined 14-day treatment period.
- Intend to initiate ART during the screening period, at study entry, or within the study-defined 14-day treatment period.
- Intend to use any additional oral topical treatments within the study- defined 14-day treatment period.
- Known allergy/sensitivity or any hypersensitivity to components of study drugs or their formulation.
- Active drug or alcohol use or dependence that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would interfere with adherence to study requirements.
- Serious illness, in the opinion of the site investigator, requiring systemic treatment.
- Hospitalization within 30 days prior to study entry for HIV or HIV-related conditions.
- Previous or current history of porphyria.
- Presence of oral warts during the screening period or at the study entry visit before randomization.
- Current wearing of full dentures or a maxillary partial denture at study entry
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
Gaborone Prevention/Treatment Trials CRS (12701)
Gaborone, Botswana
Molepolole Prevention/Treatment Trials CRS (12702)
Molepolole, Botswana
BJ Medical College CRS (31441)
Pune, Maharashtra, 411001, India
National AIDS Research Institute Pune CRS (11601)
Pune, Maharashtra, 411026, India
AMPATH at Moi Univ. Teaching Hosp. Eldoret CRS (12601)
Eldoret, 30100, Kenya
Walter Reed Project - Kenya Med. Research Institute Kericho CRS (12501)
Kericho, 20200, Kenya
College of Med. JHU CRS (30301)
Blantyre, Malawi
Durban Adult HIV CRS (11201)
Durban, 4013 SF, South Africa
Joint Clinical Research Centre (JCRC) (12401)
Kampala, Uganda
UZ-Parirenyatwa CRS (30313)
Harare, Zimbabwe
Related Publications (1)
Mukherjee PK, Chen H, Patton LL, Evans S, Lee A, Kumwenda J, Hakim J, Masheto G, Sawe F, Pho MT, Freedberg KA, Shiboski CH, Ghannoum MA, Salata RA; Oral HIVAIDS Research Alliance (OHARA)AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 5265 Team. Topical gentian violet compared with nystatin oral suspension for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV-1-infected participants. AIDS. 2017 Jan 2;31(1):81-88. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001286.
PMID: 27677161DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- ACTG Clinicaltrials.gov Coordinator
- Organization
- ACTG Network Coordinating Center, Social and Scientific Systems, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Robert A Salata, MD
Case CRS
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James G Hakim, MD
UZ- Parirenyatwa CRS
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tim Hodgson, MD
Eastman Dental Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard J Jurevic, DDS, PhD
Case CRS
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pranab K Mukherjee, PhD, MSc
Case CRS
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cissy M Kityo, MBChB, MSc
JCRC CRS
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rana Traboulsi, MD
Case CRS
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Srikanth P Tripathy, MD, MBBS
NARI Pune CRS
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mahmoud A Ghannoum, Phd, MSc
Case Western Reserve University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 3, 2010
First Posted
September 2, 2011
Study Start
June 1, 2011
Primary Completion
September 1, 2012
Study Completion
January 1, 2014
Last Updated
February 16, 2015
Results First Posted
February 16, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-02