NCT01426321

Brief Summary

For patients with advanced heart failure, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) has been a major improvement. The treatment improves symptoms and prolongs life in selected patients with heart failure. However, with the current selection criteria and methods for implanting the pacemaker, only 60-70% of the patients derive significant benefit from the treatment. New imaging techniques, including advanced ultrasound and computed tomography, in combination with new versatile multi-pole electrodes, have made an individually tailored therapy possible. Using these techniques in combination, the study will investigate the effect of individually based "optimal" placement of the pacemaker electrodes vs. standard care. The optimal LV electrode position is defined as pacing a viable segment with the latest mechanical delay, targeting a specific segment of the coronary sinus as visualised on cardiac CT. The hypothesis is that this will increase the number of positive responders from 65% to 85%.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable heart-failure

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2011

Longer than P75 for not_applicable heart-failure

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2011

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 25, 2011

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 31, 2011

Completed
6.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2018

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

March 28, 2019

Status Verified

March 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

6.4 years

First QC Date

August 25, 2011

Last Update Submit

March 27, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Cardiac resynchronization therapyEchocardiographyCardiac computed tomography

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Positive response to CRT treatment

    The primary efficacy endpoint will evaluate the effect of echocardiography and cardiac CT guided placement of the left ventricular lead vs standard care (i.e. position of the left ventricular lead at the discretion of the treating physician). Number of patients with positive response to CRT (YES or NO). A positive response is defined as survival in combination with either a reduction in end systolic left ventricular volume ≥ 15% by echocardiography ("volume responder") and / or improvement ≥ 1 NYHA class and ≥10% improvement in 6 minute hall walk test ("clinical responder").

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Response to CRT (on-treatment analysis)

    6 months

  • Heart failure morbidity

    6 months 2 years and 5 years

  • Morbidity and mortality

    6 months 2 years and 5 years

  • Mortality

    6 months, 2 years and 5 years

  • Left ventricular dyssynchrony

    6 months

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Imaging guided LV lead positioning

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Other: Imaging guided LV lead positioning

Standard LV lead positioning

NO INTERVENTION

The LV lead position is decided at the discretion of the treating physician. Cardiac CT images are available for viewing, but no echocardiography data regarding segmental myocardial strain are available.

Interventions

LV lead positioning guided by echocardiography (mechanical strain evaluation by speckle tracking) in combination with cardiac CT. A viable segment with the latest mechanical activation is targeted, and an appropriate "optimal" cardiac vein segment is then chosen using the CT images.

Imaging guided LV lead positioning

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Symptomatic heart failure (New York Heart Association functional class II - IV) despite stabile optimal medical therapy.
  • Wide QRS ≥ 120 milliseconds on standard ECG.
  • LV systolic dysfunction (EF ≤ 35%).
  • Written informed consent.
  • Accepted for CRT-P or CRT-D treatment

You may not qualify if:

  • Life expectancy \< 12 months.
  • Recent myocardial infarction (\< 3 months).
  • Significant valve disease
  • Chronic atrial fibrillation
  • Pregnancy
  • Severely impaired renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 30 ml/min)
  • Unable to give written informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Skane University Hospital

Lund, 221 85, Sweden

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Borgquist R, Carlsson M, Markstad H, Werther-Evaldsson A, Ostenfeld E, Roijer A, Bakos Z. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Guided by Echocardiography, MRI, and CT Imaging: A Randomized Controlled Study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Oct;6(10):1300-1309. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.05.011. Epub 2020 Aug 12.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Rasmus Borgquist, MD PhD

    Region Skane

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2011

First Posted

August 31, 2011

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion

January 1, 2018

Study Completion

December 1, 2018

Last Updated

March 28, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-03

Locations