Prioritized Clinical Decision Support (CDS) to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk
2 other identifiers
interventional
7,914
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The objective of this project is to develop and implement sophisticated point-of-care Electronic Health Record (EHR)-based clinical decision support that (a) identifies and (b) prioritizes all available evidence-based treatment options to reduce a given patient's cardiovascular risk (CVR). After developing the EHR-based decision support intervention, the investigators will test its impact on CVR, the components of CVR, in a group randomized trial that includes 18 primary care clinics, 60 primary care physicians, and 18,000 adults with moderate or high CVR. This approach, if successful, will (a) improve chronic disease outcomes and reduce CVR for about 35% of the U.S. adult population, (b) maximize the clinical return on the massive investments that are increasingly being made in sophisticated outpatient EHR systems, and (c) provide a model for how to use EHR technology support to deliver "personalized medicine" in primary care settings
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable hypertension
Started Aug 2012
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 17, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 19, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 20, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 19, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 19, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 21, 2018
CompletedSeptember 21, 2018
February 1, 2015
2 years
January 17, 2011
August 14, 2017
September 17, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Predicted Annual Rate of Change in 10-year Risk of Fatal or Nonfatal Heart Attack or Stroke
Ten year cardiovascular risk was calculated at each post index visit from the most recent clinical and laboratory values in the EMR. The Framingham lipid equation was used when a lipid value was available in the previous 5 years; otherwise the Framingham BMI equation was used. The primary outcome was the annualized rate of change (slope) in 10-year CVR, estimated for each treatment group from the time and time-by-treatment parameters of a mixed regression model which predicted post-index CVR values from time elapsed since index, treatment group and the time by treatment interaction.
Index to 14 months post index
Study Arms (2)
Prioritized Clinical Decision Support
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe Prioritized Clinical Decision Support (CDS) intervention is a protocol driven CDS system linked within the EMR that identifies patients with high cardiovascular risk and provides tailored, prioritized decision support to the provider and patient at the point of care. The CDS was printed at intervention sites. It i) compiled most recent lab data (A1c, SBP, and LDL), BMI, smoking status, and aspirin use, (ii) calculated a 10-year risk for stroke or heart attack, (iii) prioritized clinical domains based on the absolute risk reduction for each component, (iv) compiled information related to renal and liver function, creatine kinase level, and previous diagnoses (CHF, CVD, DM), and (v) provided recommendations for intensification of therapy for A1c, SBP and/or LDL if not at goal.
Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONProviders in the usual care arm did not have access to the prioritized clinical decision support tool.
Interventions
Eighteen primary care clinics were blocked on size and on patient characteristics. Each clinic was randomly assigned to one of 2 study arms. All consenting PCPs were allocated to the study arm that their clinic was assigned to and the estimated 400 eligible adults with 10-year CVR \>= 10% under the care of each consenting physician were allocated to the same treatment arm as their PCP.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Practicing general internist or family physician at HealthPartners Medical Group (HPMG)
- Provide ongoing care for 200 or more adult patients with 10 year CVR \>=10%
You may not qualify if:
- PCP not practicing in HPMG clinic
- Patient age greater than 80 years
- Patient Charlson comorbidity score greater than 3
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (11)
Wolfson J, Vock DM, Bandyopadhyay S, Kottke T, Vazquez-Benitez G, Johnson P, Adomavicius G, O'Connor PJ. Use and Customization of Risk Scores for Predicting Cardiovascular Events Using Electronic Health Record Data. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Apr 24;6(4):e003670. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003670.
PMID: 28438733BACKGROUNDO'Connor PJ, Sperl-Hillen JM, Fazio CJ, Averbeck BM, Rank BH, Margolis KL. Outpatient diabetes clinical decision support: current status and future directions. Diabet Med. 2016 Jun;33(6):734-41. doi: 10.1111/dme.13090.
PMID: 27194173BACKGROUNDO'Connor PJ, Sperl-Hillen JM, Margolis KL, Kottke TE. Strategies to Prioritize Clinical Options in Primary Care. Ann Fam Med. 2017 Jan;15(1):10-13. doi: 10.1370/afm.2027. Epub 2017 Jan 6. No abstract available.
PMID: 28376456BACKGROUNDVock DM, Wolfson J, Bandyopadhyay S, Adomavicius G, Johnson PE, Vazquez-Benitez G, O'Connor PJ. Adapting machine learning techniques to censored time-to-event health record data: A general-purpose approach using inverse probability of censoring weighting. J Biomed Inform. 2016 Jun;61:119-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.03.009. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
PMID: 26992568BACKGROUNDWolfson J, Bandyopadhyay S, Elidrisi M, Vazquez-Benitez G, Vock DM, Musgrove D, Adomavicius G, Johnson PE, O'Connor PJ. A Naive Bayes machine learning approach to risk prediction using censored, time-to-event data. Stat Med. 2015 Sep 20;34(21):2941-57. doi: 10.1002/sim.6526. Epub 2015 May 18.
PMID: 25980520BACKGROUNDO'Connor PJ, Desai JR, Butler JC, Kharbanda EO, Sperl-Hillen JM. Current status and future prospects for electronic point-of-care clinical decision support in diabetes care. Curr Diab Rep. 2013 Apr;13(2):172-6. doi: 10.1007/s11892-012-0350-z.
PMID: 23225213BACKGROUNDGilmer TP, O'Connor PJ, Sperl-Hillen JM, Rush WA, Johnson PE, Amundson GH, Asche SE, Ekstrom HL. Cost-effectiveness of an electronic medical record based clinical decision support system. Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec;47(6):2137-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01427.x. Epub 2012 May 11.
PMID: 22578085BACKGROUNDO'Connor PJ, Sperl-Hillen JM, Rush WA, Johnson PE, Amundson GH, Asche SE, Ekstrom HL, Gilmer TP. Impact of electronic health record clinical decision support on diabetes care: a randomized trial. Ann Fam Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;9(1):12-21. doi: 10.1370/afm.1196.
PMID: 21242556BACKGROUNDO'Connor P. Opportunities to Increase the Effectiveness of EHR-Based Diabetes Clinical Decision Support. Appl Clin Inform. 2011 Aug 31;2(3):350-4. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2011-05-IE-0032. Print 2011.
PMID: 23616881BACKGROUNDSperl-Hillen J, Margolis K, Crain L. Risk and Benefit Information and Use of Aspirin. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):291. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7988. No abstract available.
PMID: 28166337BACKGROUNDSperl-Hillen JM, Crain AL, Margolis KL, Ekstrom HL, Appana D, Amundson G, Sharma R, Desai JR, O'Connor PJ. Clinical decision support directed to primary care patients and providers reduces cardiovascular risk: a randomized trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Sep 1;25(9):1137-1146. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy085.
PMID: 29982627RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Because this study was conducted at a single, relatively high-performing medical group, generalizability of results to other care delivery systems or patient populations is uncertain.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Patrick O'Connor
- Organization
- HealthPartners Institute
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Patrick J O'Connor, MD, MPH, MA
HealthPartners Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2011
First Posted
August 19, 2011
Study Start
August 20, 2012
Primary Completion
August 19, 2014
Study Completion
August 19, 2014
Last Updated
September 21, 2018
Results First Posted
September 21, 2018
Record last verified: 2015-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share