NCT01410526

Brief Summary

Protocol Synopsis Protocol title: Assessment of peritoneal immune response in patients with severe intra-abdominal sepsis managed by laparostomy and VAC Purpose: Assessment of peritoneal immune response in patients with severe intra-abdominal sepsis Design: Prospective, single-center study Patient Population: Male or female adults (\>18 years) with severe intra-abdominal sepsis No. of Subjects: 60 patients divided into two groups, 30 patients with severe intra-operative sepsis and 30 patients without sepsis scheduled to undergo major abdominal operations (middle line incision\>15cm). The study is estimated up to 2 year to enroll Duration of Follow-up: Follow-up will be performed daily while hospitalized, until patient discharged or deceased. Endpoints:

  1. 1.To measure the peritoneal cytokines levels in patients with severe intra-abdominal sepsis.
  2. 2.To correlate the cytokines levels in the abdominal cavity and the serum plasma.
  3. 3.To correlate cytokines response in serum plasma and peritoneal fluid with mortality and morbidity.
  4. 4.To compare cytokines results in serum plasma and peritoneal fluid between patients with severe intra-abdominal sepsis and patients undergoing major laparotomy without sepsis.
  5. 5.To assess the microbial load in the abdominal cavity in patients with severe sepsis.
  6. 6.To assess the biofilm formation in VAC polyurethane sponge.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2011

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2011

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 5, 2011

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 5, 2011

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2015

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

August 30, 2021

Status Verified

August 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

July 5, 2011

Last Update Submit

August 25, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

VACSevere abdominal sepsisPeritoneal immune reactionPeritonitisImmune peritoneal reaction when abdominal sepsis is treated with VAC

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Measure peritoneal immune response to intra-abdominal sepsis

    Possible alterations of the following factors in the blood and the periotoneal fluid: CRP, PCT, Lectin Binding Protein (LBP),IL 1α, IL 1β, IL6, IL8, IL12, IL 10, IL 18, INF-γ, TNF-α, PGF-B, PAF, FGF-β, C5q, C3q, ICAM-I (CD54),Fractalkine, CCL6.

    5/2011-5/2013 (2 years)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • General characteristics

    5/2011-5/2013 (2 years)

Study Arms (2)

VAC group

Patients with intra-abdominal sepsis treated with Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) system plus the dynamic sutures

Control group

Patients suffering major abdominal surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

In all patients that the origin of sepsis confirmed pre-operative as abdominal, laparotomy will be required.

You may qualify if:

  • Patient \> 18 years old
  • patients with severe abdominal sepsis in order to form the study group and 30 patients without sepsis undergoing major elective surgery (middle line incision \>15cm) to form the control group.
  • Patient or relatives signs and dates a written informed consent form (ICF) and indicates an understanding of the study procedures

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient's Manheim Peritonitis Score \< 29
  • Patient's pre-operative SOFA score \< 6
  • The use of other temporary abdominal closure system
  • Decease before the first VAC dressing change
  • Patient is participating in another clinical trial which may affect this study's outcomes
  • Patients with immune deficiency
  • Documented seropositivity for human immunodeficiency virus (AIDS)
  • Patient receiving steroids treatment for other medical condition
  • Patient receiving chronic anti-inflammatory treatment
  • Patient receiving anti- TNF treatment
  • Pre-existing parechymal liver disease ( Cirrhosis - Child-Pugh C)
  • Pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

3rd Department of Surgery, AHEPA University Hospital

Thessaloniki, 54636, Greece

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • 1.Calandra T, Cohne J. The international sepsis forum consensus conference on definitions of infection in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2005;33:1538-48. 2.Pieracci F, Barie PS. Intrabdominal infections. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007;13:440-9. 3.Ordoñez CA, Puyana JC. Management of peritonitis in the critically ill patient. Surg Clin North Am 2006;86:1323-49. 4.Stawicki SP, Brooks A, Bilski T et al. The concept of damage control: Extending paradigm to emergency general surgery. Injury 2008;39:93-101. 5.Duff JH, Moffat J. Abdominal sepsis managed by leaving abdomen open. Surgery. 1981;90(4):774-8. 6.Barker DE, Green JM, Maxwell RA, et al. Experience with vacuum-pack temporary abdominal wound closure in 258 trauma and general and vascular surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:784-92 7. Perez D, Wildi S, Demartines N et al. Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted closure in abdominal compartment syndrome and severe abdominal sepsis. J Am Coll Surg 2007;205:586-92. 8.Management of the Open Abdomen: From Initial Operation to Definitive Closure. Open abdomen advisory panel: Co-Editors: D. Vargo, J. D. Richardson. Advisory panel: A. Cambell, M. Chang, T. Fabian, M. Franz, M. Kaplan, F. Moore, R. L. Reed, B. Scott, R. Silverman. Am Surg. 2009;75:S1-22. 9.Blackwell TS, Christman JW. Sepsis and cytokines: current status. British J Anaesth. 1996;77:110-7. 10.Oberholzer A, Souza S, Tschoeke S et al. Plasma cytokine measurements augment prognostic scores as indicators of outcome in patients with severe sepsis. Shock. 2005;23(6):488-93.

    BACKGROUND
  • 11.Cogos CA, Drosou E, Bassaris HP et al. Pro-versus anti- inflammatory cytokines profile in patients with severe sepsis: a marker for prognosis and future therapeutic options. J Infect Dis. 2000;181:176-80. 12.Dimopoulou I, Armaganidis A, Douka E et al. Tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNFa) and interleukin-10 are crucial mediators in post-operative inflammatory response and determine the occurrence of complications after major abdominal surgery. Cytokine 2007;37:55-61. 13.Pettila V, Hynninen M, Takkunen O et al. Predictive value of procalcitonin and interleukin 6 in critically ill patients with suspected sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:1220-5. 14.Scheingraber S, Bauerfeilnd F, Bohme J, Dralle H. Limits of peritoneal cytokine measure ements during abdominal lavage treatment for intra-abdominal sepsis. Am J Surg. 2001;18:301-8. 15.Jansson K, Redler B, Truedsson L et al. Intraperitoneal cytokine response after major surgery: higher postoperative intraperitoneal versus systemic cytokine levels suggest the gastrointestinal tract as the major source of the postoperative inflammatory reaction. Am J Surg. 2004;187:372-7 16.Decker D, Tolba R, Spinger W et al. Abdominal surgical interventions: local and systemic conseqouences for the immune system - a prospective study on elective gastrointestinal surgery. J Surg Research. 2005;126:12-8. 17.van Berge Henegouwen M, van der Poll T, van Deventer S, Gouma D. Peritoneal cytokine release after elective gastrointestinal surgery and postoperative complications. Am J Surg. 1998;175:311-6 18.Pedersen M, Qvist N, Bisgaard C et al. Peritoneal microdialysis. Early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectosigmoid cancer. Scan J Surg. 2009;98:148-54. 19.Pliakos I, Papavramidis TS, Mihalopoulos N et al. Vacuum assisted closure in severe abdominal sepsis with or without retention sutured sequential fascial closure: a clinical trial. Surgery. 2010;148(5):947-53.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Intraabdominal InfectionsPeritonitis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

InfectionsPeritoneal DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Nick Michalopoulos, MD

    3rd Dpt of Surgery

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Theodossis S Papavramidis, PhD

    3rd Dpt of Surgery

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Spiros Papavramidis, Prof

    3rd Dpt of Surgery

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Stella Arampatzi, MD

    Dpt of Microbiology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Eudoxia Diza-Mataftsi, Prof

    Dpt of microbiology

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Ioannis Pliakos, MD

    3 dpt of Surgery

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor in Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2011

First Posted

August 5, 2011

Study Start

May 1, 2011

Primary Completion

May 1, 2015

Study Completion

August 1, 2015

Last Updated

August 30, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-08

Locations