Study Stopped
Slow enrollment
BES, EES, and ZES-R in Real World Practice
CHOICE
A Multicenter, Open-labeled, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Three 2nd Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Real-World Practice
1 other identifier
interventional
1,960
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to compare the rate of device-oriented composite consisted of cardiac death, myocardial infarction not clearly attributable to a nontarget vessel, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization among the patients treated with EES, ZES-R, or BES at 24-month clinical follow-up post-index procedure. Trial end points are summarized in Table I. The hypothesis is that BES is equivalent to EES or BES is equivalent to ZES-R at the primary end point.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
Started Jan 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 5, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 19, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 16, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 5, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2019
CompletedJuly 9, 2019
July 1, 2019
4.9 years
July 5, 2011
July 5, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Device-oriented composite
Device-oriented composite consisted of cardiac death, myocardial infarction not clearly attributable to a nontarget vessel, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 24-month clinical follow-up
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Patient-oriented composite
at 24 months
Device-oriented composite
12 months
Patient-oriented composite
12 months
Each component of device- and patient-oriented composite
12 months
Each component of device- and patient-oriented composite
24 months
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Biolimus-eluting stent
ACTIVE COMPARATORBiomatrix stent, Biosensors, USA Biomatrix Flex stent, Biosensors, USA
Everolimus-eluting stent
ACTIVE COMPARATORXience Prime stent, Abbott, USA Xience V stent, Abbott, USA
Zotarolimus-eluting stent
ACTIVE COMPARATOREndeavor resolute, Medtronic, USA Endeavor resolute integrity, Medtronic, USA
Interventions
Biolimus-eluting stent (BES, BioMatrix or BioMatrix Flex, Biosensors, USA) has bio-degradable polymer which is consisted with poly-lactic acid (PLA) and degraded into H2O and CO2 while releasing the biolimus. BES would be expected to reduce the stent thrombosis comparing with the DES with durable polymer.
Everolimus-eluting stent (EES, Xience V or Xience Prime, Abbott, USA) use the MULTILINK VISION stent platform and durable polymer containing everolimus. It has the thinnest strut thickness among the available DES in Korea.
Zotarolimus-eluting stent with biolinx polymer (ZES, Endeavor Resolute or Endeavor Resolute Intergrity, Medtronic, USA) has DRIVER stent platform. The durable polymer in this DES has changed from phosphorylcholine (PC) polymer which was used in Endeavor to Biolinx polymer which has more biocompatible features.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 19 years
- Subject is able to verbally confirm understanding of risks, benefits and treatment alternatives of receiving the drug-eluting stent(s) and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides written informed consent prior to any study related procedure
- Subject must have significant stenosis (\>50% by visual estimate) on a native or in-stent coronary artery
- Subject must have evidence of myocardial ischemia (e.g., stable, unstable angina, recent infarction, acute myocardial infarction, positive functional study or a reversible changes in the ECG consistent with ischemia). In subjects with coronary artery stenosis \>75%, evidence of myocardial ischemia does not have to be documented
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications: heparin, aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, biolimus A9, everolimus, zotarolimus, stainless steel, cobalt chromium, contrast media (Patients with documented sensitivity to contrast media, which can be effectively premedicated with steroid and diphenhydramine may be enrolled. However, those with true anaphylaxis to prior contrast media should not be enrolled.)
- Subject in use of systemic (intravenous) biolimus A9, everolimus or zotarolimus within 12 months.
- Female subject of childbearing potential, unless a recent pregnancy test is negative, who possibly plans to become pregnant any time after enrollment into this study
- Subject planned an elective surgical procedure that would necessitate interruption of antiplatelet during the first 12 months post enrollment
- Subject with non-cardiac co-morbid condition with life expectancy \< 2 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment)
- Subject with cardiogenic shock at presentation
- Subject who are actively participating in another drug or device investigational study, who have not completed the primary end point follow-up period
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Wonju Christian Hospital
Wŏnju, Gangwon-do, 220-701, South Korea
Chonnam National University Hospital
Chuncheon, South Korea
Daegu Catholic University Hospital
Daegu, South Korea
Inha University Hospital
Incheon, South Korea
Suncheon St. Carollo Hospital
Suncheon, South Korea
Related Publications (24)
Kastrati A, Dibra A, Mehilli J, Mayer S, Pinieck S, Pache J, Dirschinger J, Schomig A. Predictive factors of restenosis after coronary implantation of sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents. Circulation. 2006 May 16;113(19):2293-300. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.601823. Epub 2006 May 8.
PMID: 16682614BACKGROUNDMoses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, Fitzgerald PJ, Holmes DR, O'Shaughnessy C, Caputo RP, Kereiakes DJ, Williams DO, Teirstein PS, Jaeger JL, Kuntz RE; SIRIUS Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2003 Oct 2;349(14):1315-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035071.
PMID: 14523139BACKGROUNDPfisterer M, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Buser PT, Rickenbacher P, Hunziker P, Mueller C, Jeger R, Bader F, Osswald S, Kaiser C; BASKET-LATE Investigators. Late clinical events after clopidogrel discontinuation may limit the benefit of drug-eluting stents: an observational study of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Dec 19;48(12):2584-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.026. Epub 2006 Nov 2.
PMID: 17174201BACKGROUNDStone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, Hermiller J, O'Shaughnessy C, Mann JT, Turco M, Caputo R, Bergin P, Greenberg J, Popma JJ, Russell ME; TAXUS-IV Investigators. A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jan 15;350(3):221-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032441.
PMID: 14724301BACKGROUNDHolmes DR Jr, Kereiakes DJ, Laskey WK, Colombo A, Ellis SG, Henry TD, Popma JJ, Serruys PW, Kimura T, Williams DO, Windecker S, Krucoff MW. Thrombosis and drug-eluting stents: an objective appraisal. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jul 10;50(2):109-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.032. Epub 2007 May 22.
PMID: 17616294BACKGROUNDIakovou I, Schmidt T, Bonizzoni E, Ge L, Sangiorgi GM, Stankovic G, Airoldi F, Chieffo A, Montorfano M, Carlino M, Michev I, Corvaja N, Briguori C, Gerckens U, Grube E, Colombo A. Incidence, predictors, and outcome of thrombosis after successful implantation of drug-eluting stents. JAMA. 2005 May 4;293(17):2126-30. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.17.2126.
PMID: 15870416BACKGROUNDCutlip DE, Baim DS, Ho KK, Popma JJ, Lansky AJ, Cohen DJ, Carrozza JP Jr, Chauhan MS, Rodriguez O, Kuntz RE. Stent thrombosis in the modern era: a pooled analysis of multicenter coronary stent clinical trials. Circulation. 2001 Apr 17;103(15):1967-71. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.15.1967.
PMID: 11306525BACKGROUNDDoyle B, Rihal CS, O'Sullivan CJ, Lennon RJ, Wiste HJ, Bell M, Bresnahan J, Holmes DR Jr. Outcomes of stent thrombosis and restenosis during extended follow-up of patients treated with bare-metal coronary stents. Circulation. 2007 Nov 20;116(21):2391-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.707331. Epub 2007 Nov 5.
PMID: 17984377BACKGROUNDDaemen J, Wenaweser P, Tsuchida K, Abrecht L, Vaina S, Morger C, Kukreja N, Juni P, Sianos G, Hellige G, van Domburg RT, Hess OM, Boersma E, Meier B, Windecker S, Serruys PW. Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort study. Lancet. 2007 Feb 24;369(9562):667-78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60314-6.
PMID: 17321312BACKGROUNDRoukoz H, Bavry AA, Sarkees ML, Mood GR, Kumbhani DJ, Rabbat MG, Bhatt DL. Comprehensive meta-analysis on drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents during extended follow-up. Am J Med. 2009 Jun;122(6):581.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.12.019.
PMID: 19486720BACKGROUNDKirtane AJ, Gupta A, Iyengar S, Moses JW, Leon MB, Applegate R, Brodie B, Hannan E, Harjai K, Jensen LO, Park SJ, Perry R, Racz M, Saia F, Tu JV, Waksman R, Lansky AJ, Mehran R, Stone GW. Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting and bare metal stents: comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized trials and observational studies. Circulation. 2009 Jun 30;119(25):3198-206. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.826479. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
PMID: 19528338BACKGROUNDMauri L, Hsieh WH, Massaro JM, Ho KK, D'Agostino R, Cutlip DE. Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):1020-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067731. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
PMID: 17296821BACKGROUNDStone GW, Moses JW, Ellis SG, Schofer J, Dawkins KD, Morice MC, Colombo A, Schampaert E, Grube E, Kirtane AJ, Cutlip DE, Fahy M, Pocock SJ, Mehran R, Leon MB. Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):998-1008. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067193. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
PMID: 17296824BACKGROUNDCaixeta A, Lansky AJ, Serruys PW, Hermiller JB, Ruygrok P, Onuma Y, Gordon P, Yaqub M, Miquel-Hebert K, Veldhof S, Sood P, Su X, Jonnavithula L, Sudhir K, Stone GW; SPIRIT II and III Investigators. Clinical follow-up 3 years after everolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents: a pooled analysis from the SPIRIT II (A Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) and SPIRIT III (A Clinical Evaluation of the Investigational Device XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [EECSS] in the Treatment of Subjects With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) randomized trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Dec;3(12):1220-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.07.017.
PMID: 21232715BACKGROUNDKedhi E, Joesoef KS, McFadden E, Wassing J, van Mieghem C, Goedhart D, Smits PC. Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice (COMPARE): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010 Jan 16;375(9710):201-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62127-9. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
PMID: 20060578BACKGROUNDStone GW, Midei M, Newman W, Sanz M, Hermiller JB, Williams J, Farhat N, Mahaffey KW, Cutlip DE, Fitzgerald PJ, Sood P, Su X, Lansky AJ; SPIRIT III Investigators. Comparison of an everolimus-eluting stent and a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008 Apr 23;299(16):1903-13. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.16.1903.
PMID: 18430909BACKGROUNDStone GW, Rizvi A, Sudhir K, Newman W, Applegate RJ, Cannon LA, Maddux JT, Cutlip DE, Simonton CA, Sood P, Kereiakes DJ; SPIRIT IV Investigators. Randomized comparison of everolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents. 2-year follow-up from the SPIRIT (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) IV trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jun 28;58(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.022. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
PMID: 21514084BACKGROUNDSerruys PW, Silber S, Garg S, van Geuns RJ, Richardt G, Buszman PE, Kelbaek H, van Boven AJ, Hofma SH, Linke A, Klauss V, Wijns W, Macaya C, Garot P, DiMario C, Manoharan G, Kornowski R, Ischinger T, Bartorelli A, Ronden J, Bressers M, Gobbens P, Negoita M, van Leeuwen F, Windecker S. Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting coronary stents. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 8;363(2):136-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1004130. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
PMID: 20554978BACKGROUNDSilber S, Windecker S, Vranckx P, Serruys PW; RESOLUTE All Comers investigators. Unrestricted randomised use of two new generation drug-eluting coronary stents: 2-year patient-related versus stent-related outcomes from the RESOLUTE All Comers trial. Lancet. 2011 Apr 9;377(9773):1241-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60395-4. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
PMID: 21459430BACKGROUNDStefanini GG, Kalesan B, Serruys PW, Heg D, Buszman P, Linke A, Ischinger T, Klauss V, Eberli F, Wijns W, Morice MC, Di Mario C, Corti R, Antoni D, Sohn HY, Eerdmans P, van Es GA, Meier B, Windecker S, Juni P. Long-term clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease (LEADERS): 4 year follow-up of a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2011 Dec 3;378(9807):1940-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61672-3. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
PMID: 22075451BACKGROUNDWindecker S, Serruys PW, Wandel S, Buszman P, Trznadel S, Linke A, Lenk K, Ischinger T, Klauss V, Eberli F, Corti R, Wijns W, Morice MC, di Mario C, Davies S, van Geuns RJ, Eerdmans P, van Es GA, Meier B, Juni P. Biolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer versus sirolimus-eluting stent with durable polymer for coronary revascularisation (LEADERS): a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2008 Sep 27;372(9644):1163-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61244-1. Epub 2008 Aug 31.
PMID: 18765162BACKGROUNDLuscher TF, Steffel J, Eberli FR, Joner M, Nakazawa G, Tanner FC, Virmani R. Drug-eluting stent and coronary thrombosis: biological mechanisms and clinical implications. Circulation. 2007 Feb 27;115(8):1051-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.675934.
PMID: 17325255BACKGROUNDYoun YJ, Lee JW, Ahn SG, Lee SH, Yoon J, Park KS, Lee JB, Yoo SY, Lim DS, Cho JH, Choi CU, Jeong MH, Han KR, Cha KS, Lee SY, Choi HH, Choi JW, Hyon MS, Kim MH. Randomized Comparison of Everolimus- and Zotarolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents With Biolimus-Eluting Stents in All-Comer Patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar;13(3):e008525. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008525. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
PMID: 32160779DERIVEDYoun YJ, Lee JW, Ahn SG, Lee SH, Choi HH, Choi H, Choi CU, Lee JB, Cho JH, Kang TS, Cho BR, Cha KS, Kim MH, Hyon MS, Cheong SS, Lim DS, Han KR, Jeong MH, Park KS, Yoon J. Study design and rationale of "a multicenter, open-labeled, randomized controlled trial comparing three 2nd-generation drug-eluting stents in real-world practice" (CHOICE trial). Am Heart J. 2013 Aug;166(2):224-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.04.014. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
PMID: 23895804DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Junghan Yoon, M.D., Ph.D.
Wonju Chrisitian Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 5, 2011
First Posted
July 19, 2011
Study Start
January 16, 2013
Primary Completion
December 5, 2017
Study Completion
January 1, 2019
Last Updated
July 9, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07