NCT01393769

Brief Summary

For selected cases with advanced Retinoblastoma (RTB) intraocular involvement(stage V of the Reese-Ellsworth classification) in which enucleation would usually be the standard therapeutic approach, in this project the investigators propose an alternative conservative treatment using intra-arterial chemotherapy with melphalan, via direct administration by catheterization of the ophthalmic artery.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
5

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2009

Typical duration for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2009

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 7, 2011

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 13, 2011

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2012

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

August 2, 2016

Status Verified

August 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

July 7, 2011

Last Update Submit

August 1, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

RetinoblastomaRTBOcular tumourMelfalanEnucleationTumor of the eyeEyeOcular cancerOcular chemotherapyOphthalmic arteryIntra-arterial chemotherapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • To assess the saving of eyes affected with RTB for patients who would have been candidates for enucleation.

    The primary endpoint will be the objective response to treatment determined by funduscopy and RetCam explorations, recorded as a percentage of partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) to the treatment administered.

    From V1 (Baseline) to V14 (1+ year after last treatment)

  • The response will be evaluated as a function of tumoral volumetric size.

    The response will be evaluated as a function of tumoral volumetric size by comparing images obtained in successive funduscopy and RetCam explorations.

    From V1 (Baseline) to V14 (+1 year after last treatment)

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • To preserve visual acuity, by studying the affected eye after the third cycle of treatment.

    V1 (Basal), V13 (day +52 to +60), V14 (+1 year after last treatment)

  • To modify the result of electroretinographic studies and visual evoked potentials after the third cycle of treatment.

    V1 (Basal), V13 (day +52 to +60), V14 (+1 year after last treatment dosage)

  • To evaluate the safety of the technique and medicinal product used, by studying the ophthalmologic and systemic adverse events.

    Adverse events:on ongoing basis-assessed in each protocol visit / Laboratory test: V1 (Basal), V3&4 (day +1 to+10), V7&8 (day +22 to +31), V11&12 (day +43 to +52)

Study Arms (1)

Melphalan

EXPERIMENTAL

Intra-arterial chemotherapy with melphalan, via direct administration by catheterization of the ophthalmic artery. Dosage range from 3 to 5 mg, depending of patient's weight and estimated tumour volume: a)3 mg for patients under 10 kg and tumour volume size under 1,5 cm3; b)5 mg for patients over 10 kg and tumour volume over 1,5 cm3; c)4 mg in all other situations(tumour volume over 1,5 cm3 in patients under 10 kg or tumour volume under 1,5 cm3 in patients over 10 kg).

Drug: Melphalan

Interventions

The usual number of chemotherapy cycles will be 3. First treatment with Melphalan will be initiated as soon as possible, once the patients are selected for the study. Once the first treatment has been completed, day 0, successive treatments will be considered, second and third (days 21 and 42). In those cases in which some patients could be considered for an additional treatments after the third cycle, these will be administrated in intervals at least of 21 days.Dosage range from 3 to 5 mg, depending of patient's weight and estimated tumour volume.

Also known as: Melfalan, Melfalan GlaxoSmithKline Inyectable
Melphalan

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Months - 6 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with unilateral RTB.
  • Patients with advanced intraocular involvement, corresponding to Stage D of the International Classification , selected by the Tumour Committee of the Retinoblastoma Unit.
  • The only alternative to treatment is enucleation.
  • Over six months old at diagnosis and younger than six years old.
  • Informed consent of the parents or legal representative.

You may not qualify if:

  • Under 6 months old at diagnosis.
  • Impaired kidney function, with creatinine clearance lower than 80 mL/min/1.73m2 or serum creatinine higher than 0.7 mg/dL.
  • Impaired liver function, normal function being defined as presenting total bilirubin levels lower than 1.5 times the limit of normal for that age and ALT lower than 5 times the limit of normal for that age.
  • Patients with some type of coagulation disorder that could contraindicate the procedure or with a previous diagnosis of any thrombotic condition.
  • Congenital cerebral anomalies diagnosed previously or detected by angioresonance prior to treatment for extraocular involvement by RTB shown by image techniques, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology or cytomorphology of bone marrow aspirates (BMA), or positive expression of GD2 synthase in CSF or BMA.
  • Patients with heart disease, arterial hypertension, or diseases of the nervous system not referred to in point 5, or with active infections that the Anaesthesiology Service responsible for the procedure have studied and consider to contraindicate the procedure.
  • Not having been selected for intra-arterial chemotherapy through the ophthalmic artery for any other reason than those given by the Tumour Committee of the RTB Unit of the HSJD.
  • Concurrent administration of any other anti-cancer treatment.
  • Any surgical or non-surgical procedure that could have changed the structure of the eye and, therefore, facilitate risk of dissemination, including histological confirmation prior to treatment.
  • Participation in another clinical trial.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Sant Joan de Déu

Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08950, Spain

Location

Related Publications (21)

  • Abramson DH, Dunkel IJ, Brodie SE, Kim JW, Gobin YP. A phase I/II study of direct intraarterial (ophthalmic artery) chemotherapy with melphalan for intraocular retinoblastoma initial results. Ophthalmology. 2008 Aug;115(8):1398-404, 1404.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.12.014. Epub 2008 Mar 14.

    PMID: 18342944BACKGROUND
  • Aerts I, Pacquement H, Doz F, Mosseri V, Desjardins L, Sastre X, Michon J, Rodriguez J, Schlienger P, Zucker JM, Quintana E. Outcome of second malignancies after retinoblastoma: a retrospective analysis of 25 patients treated at the Institut Curie. Eur J Cancer. 2004 Jul;40(10):1522-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.03.023.

    PMID: 15196536BACKGROUND
  • Apushkin MA, Apushkin MA, Shapiro MJ, Mafee MF. Retinoblastoma and simulating lesions: role of imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2005 Feb;15(1):49-67. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2005.02.003.

    PMID: 15927860BACKGROUND
  • Brisse HJ, Lumbroso L, Freneaux PC, Validire P, Doz FP, Quintana EJ, Berges O, Desjardins LC, Neuenschwander SG. Sonographic, CT, and MR imaging findings in diffuse infiltrative retinoblastoma: report of two cases with histologic comparison. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001 Mar;22(3):499-504.

    PMID: 11237973BACKGROUND
  • Chantada G, Doz F, Antoneli CB, Grundy R, Clare Stannard FF, Dunkel IJ, Grabowski E, Leal-Leal C, Rodriguez-Galindo C, Schvartzman E, Popovic MB, Kremens B, Meadows AT, Zucker JM. A proposal for an international retinoblastoma staging system. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006 Nov;47(6):801-5. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20606.

    PMID: 16358310BACKGROUND
  • Chantada G, Fandino A, Manzitti J, Urrutia L, Schvartzman E. Late diagnosis of retinoblastoma in a developing country. Arch Dis Child. 1999 Feb;80(2):171-4. doi: 10.1136/adc.80.2.171.

    PMID: 10325735BACKGROUND
  • Chantada GL, Dunkel IJ, de Davila MT, Abramson DH. Retinoblastoma patients with high risk ocular pathological features: who needs adjuvant therapy? Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Aug;88(8):1069-73. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2003.037044.

    PMID: 15258027BACKGROUND
  • Chantada GL, Fandino A, Mato G, Casak S. Phase II window of idarubicin in children with extraocular retinoblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jun;17(6):1847-50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.6.1847.

    PMID: 10561224BACKGROUND
  • Chantada GL, Rossi J, Casco F, Fandino A, Scopinaro M, de Davila MT, Abramson DH. An aggressive bone marrow evaluation including immunocytology with GD2 for advanced retinoblastoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2006 Jun;28(6):369-73. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200606000-00009.

    PMID: 16794505BACKGROUND
  • Dunkel IJ, Aledo A, Kernan NA, Kushner B, Bayer L, Gollamudi SV, Finlay JL, Abramson DH. Successful treatment of metastatic retinoblastoma. Cancer. 2000 Nov 15;89(10):2117-21. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001115)89:103.0.co;2-9.

    PMID: 11066053BACKGROUND
  • Dunkel IJ, Gerald WL, Rosenfield NS, Strong EW, Abramson DH, Ghavimi F. Outcome of patients with a history of bilateral retinoblastoma treated for a second malignancy: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1998 Jan;30(1):59-62. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-911x(199801)30:13.0.co;2-3.

    PMID: 9371391BACKGROUND
  • Kaneko A, Suzuki S. Eye-preservation treatment of retinoblastoma with vitreous seeding. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2003 Dec;33(12):601-7.

    PMID: 14769836BACKGROUND
  • Kiribuchi M. [Retrograde infusion of anti-cancer drugs to ophthalmic artery for intraocular malignant tumors]. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1966 Nov;70(11):1829-33. No abstract available. Japanese.

    PMID: 6009660BACKGROUND
  • Moll AC, Imhof SM, Bouter LM, Kuik DJ, Den Otter W, Bezemer PD, Koten JW, Tan KE. Second primary tumors in patients with hereditary retinoblastoma: a register-based follow-up study, 1945-1994. Int J Cancer. 1996 Aug 7;67(4):515-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19960807)67:43.0.CO;2-V.

    PMID: 8759610BACKGROUND
  • Linn Murphree A. Intraocular retinoblastoma: the case for a new group classification. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2005 Mar;18(1):41-53, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.ohc.2004.11.003.

    PMID: 15763190BACKGROUND
  • REESE AB, ELLSWORTH RM. The evaluation and current concept of retinoblastoma therapy. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1963 Mar-Apr;67:164-72. No abstract available.

    PMID: 13973597BACKGROUND
  • Rodriguez-Galindo C, Wilson MW, Haik BG, Merchant TE, Billups CA, Shah N, Cain A, Langston J, Lipson M, Kun LE, Pratt CB. Treatment of intraocular retinoblastoma with vincristine and carboplatin. J Clin Oncol. 2003 May 15;21(10):2019-25. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.09.103.

    PMID: 12743157BACKGROUND
  • Shields CL, Shields JA, Baez K, Cater JR, De Potter P. Optic nerve invasion of retinoblastoma. Metastatic potential and clinical risk factors. Cancer. 1994 Feb 1;73(3):692-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940201)73:33.0.co;2-8.

    PMID: 8299091BACKGROUND
  • Shields CL, Shields JA, Minelli S, De Potter P, Hernandez C, Cater J, Brady L. Regression of retinoblastoma after plaque radiotherapy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993 Feb 15;115(2):181-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73922-4.

    PMID: 8430727BACKGROUND
  • Shields JA, Parsons H, Shields CL, Giblin ME. The role of cryotherapy in the management of retinoblastoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989 Sep 15;108(3):260-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(89)90116-5.

    PMID: 2774035BACKGROUND
  • Muen WJ, Kingston JE, Robertson F, Brew S, Sagoo MS, Reddy MA. Efficacy and complications of super-selective intra-ophthalmic artery melphalan for the treatment of refractory retinoblastoma. Ophthalmology. 2012 Mar;119(3):611-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.045. Epub 2011 Dec 22.

    PMID: 22197434BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

RetinoblastomaEye Neoplasms

Interventions

Melphalan

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms, NeuroepithelialNeuroectodermal TumorsNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms, Nerve TissueRetinal NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteEye Diseases, HereditaryEye DiseasesRetinal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Nitrogen Mustard CompoundsMustard CompoundsHydrocarbons, HalogenatedHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsPhenylalanineAmino Acids, AromaticAmino Acids, CyclicAmino AcidsAmino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins

Study Officials

  • Andreu Parareda, MD

    Hospital Sant Joan de Deu

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2011

First Posted

July 13, 2011

Study Start

November 1, 2009

Primary Completion

December 1, 2012

Study Completion

May 1, 2013

Last Updated

August 2, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-08

Locations