Trial to Assess the Impact of PrEP to Tenofovir Gel on the Efficacy of Tenofovir-containing ART on Viral Suppression
TOAST
Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Impact of Prophylactic Exposure to Tenofovir Gel on the Efficacy of Subsequent Tenofovir-containing Antiretroviral Therapy on Viral Suppression
1 other identifier
interventional
59
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The HIV/AIDS pandemic remains among the investigators greatest public health challenges. In the absence of an effective vaccine, focus has shifted to other prevention strategies such as pre-exposure prophylaxis. Tenofovir, with potent activity against retroviruses \[1\], was developed for oral use as Viread®, which is widely used for HIV treatment. The efficacy of Viread® has been demonstrated in treatment-experienced and naïve patients \[2,3\]. In antiretroviral-naive patients, the combination of tenofovir with lamivudine and efavirenz has been classified as a preferred regimen in the Department of Health and Human Services treatment guidelines\[4\], and has been adopted by the South African Department of health as the first line regimen in treatment-naïve HIV infected patients since April 2010. The durability of antiviral response, favourable resistance profile, once daily dosing, and excellent long term safety profile of tenofovir \[5\], makes this drug an attractive option in both treatment and prevention regimens and its long half-life \[6\], made it an ideal choice as the first antiretroviral drug to be formulated as a microbicide gel. The CAPRISA 004 study conducted in South Africa which tested the effectiveness and safety of 1% tenofovir gel showed that the use of tenofovir in a gel formulation reduced HIV acquisition by 39% overall, and by 54% in women with high gel adherence \[7\]. There have been concerns raised regarding the use of tenofovir in both PrEP and treatment regimens due to the potential for selection of viral mutations and development of resistance in patients who have become HIV-infected while on PrEP. There have been no studies conducted to determine whether using tenofovir in pre-exposure prophylaxis affects treatment outcomes in patients who later use tenofovir, which is part of the first line ART of South Africa. This study aims to determine whether prophylactic exposure to tenofovir gel alters the therapeutic response to a tenofovir containing antiretroviral regimen.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 21, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 20, 2017
CompletedApril 20, 2017
March 1, 2017
3.4 years
June 21, 2011
January 30, 2017
March 23, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Antiretroviral Treatment Failure Rate at 12 Months.
Treatment failure is defined as viral load \> 50 copies/ml, antiretroviral regimen changes for treatment failure or death
12 months post ART intiation or until time of death
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change in CD4+ Cell Count From Randomisation to 12 Months Post-randomisation
Measured at 12 months post ART initiation
Tenofovir Resistance, Defined as Presence of K65R, K70E or Any of the TAMS Mutations
From randomisation until either time of termination or time of death
Reported Adverse Events With Severity Grades 3 and 4 Based on the DAIDS Toxicity Grading Tables
From randomisation until either time of termination or time of death
Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses
3 years
Genital Viral Shedding (Viral Load on Tear Flow)
3 years
Study Arms (2)
Tenofovir, lamivudine and efavirenz
EXPERIMENTALZidovudine, lamivudine and efavirenz
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Tenofovir, 300mg daily, lifelong Lamivudine, 300mg daily, lifelong Efavirenz, 600mg daily, lifelong
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or older
- Previously enrolled in the CAPRISA 004 or CAPRISA 008 study - placebo or active arms
- Able and willing to provide informed consent to be screened for, and to enrol in, the study
- Able and willing to provide adequate locator information for study retention purposes
- Confirmed HIV infection in the CAPRISA 004 or 008 trial
- Agree to adhere to study visits and procedures
You may not qualify if:
- Currently on antiretroviral therapy (including PMTCT prophylaxis)
- Has any other condition that, based on the opinion of the Investigator or designee, would preclude provision of informed consent, make participation in the study unsafe, complicate interpretation of study outcome data, or otherwise interfere with achieving the study objectives.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CAPRISA
Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4000, South Africa
Related Publications (8)
De Clercq E. Acyclic nucleoside phosphonates: past, present and future. Bridging chemistry to HIV, HBV, HCV, HPV, adeno-, herpes-, and poxvirus infections: the phosphonate bridge. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007 Apr 1;73(7):911-22. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2006.09.014. Epub 2006 Sep 19.
PMID: 17045247BACKGROUNDSchooley RT, Ruane P, Myers RA, Beall G, Lampiris H, Berger D, Chen SS, Miller MD, Isaacson E, Cheng AK; Study 902 Team. Tenofovir DF in antiretroviral-experienced patients: results from a 48-week, randomized, double-blind study. AIDS. 2002 Jun 14;16(9):1257-63. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200206140-00008.
PMID: 12045491BACKGROUNDSquires K, Pozniak AL, Pierone G Jr, Steinhart CR, Berger D, Bellos NC, Becker SL, Wulfsohn M, Miller MD, Toole JJ, Coakley DF, Cheng A; Study 907 Team. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in nucleoside-resistant HIV-1 infection: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Sep 2;139(5 Pt 1):313-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-5_part_1-200309020-00006.
PMID: 12965939BACKGROUNDPanel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. December 1, 2009. Available from: www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/contentfiles/AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf. Accessed 9 November 2010.
BACKGROUNDGallant JE, Staszewski S, Pozniak AL, DeJesus E, Suleiman JM, Miller MD, Coakley DF, Lu B, Toole JJ, Cheng AK; 903 Study Group. Efficacy and safety of tenofovir DF vs stavudine in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients: a 3-year randomized trial. JAMA. 2004 Jul 14;292(2):191-201. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.2.191.
PMID: 15249568BACKGROUNDRohan LC, Moncla BJ, Kunjara Na Ayudhya RP, Cost M, Huang Y, Gai F, Billitto N, Lynam JD, Pryke K, Graebing P, Hopkins N, Rooney JF, Friend D, Dezzutti CS. In vitro and ex vivo testing of tenofovir shows it is effective as an HIV-1 microbicide. PLoS One. 2010 Feb 19;5(2):e9310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009310.
PMID: 20174579BACKGROUNDAbdool Karim Q, Abdool Karim SS, Frohlich JA, Grobler AC, Baxter C, Mansoor LE, Kharsany AB, Sibeko S, Mlisana KP, Omar Z, Gengiah TN, Maarschalk S, Arulappan N, Mlotshwa M, Morris L, Taylor D; CAPRISA 004 Trial Group. Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir gel, an antiretroviral microbicide, for the prevention of HIV infection in women. Science. 2010 Sep 3;329(5996):1168-74. doi: 10.1126/science.1193748. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
PMID: 20643915BACKGROUNDNaicker N, Naidoo A, Werner L, Garrett N, Majola N, Asari V, Baxter C, Grobler A, Karim QA, Karim SSA. Efficacy and safety of tenofovir-containing antiretroviral therapy in women who acquired HIV while enrolled in tenofovir gel prophylaxis trials. Antivir Ther. 2017;22(4):287-293. doi: 10.3851/IMP3106. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
PMID: 27835613DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The main limitation of the study was the small sample size. The eligible pool of participants was dependent on two other tenofovir gel trials, one of which experienced long delay in starting.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Head of Statistics and Data Management
- Organization
- CAPRISA
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nivashnee Naicker, MBChB
Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 21, 2011
First Posted
July 1, 2011
Study Start
June 1, 2011
Primary Completion
November 1, 2014
Study Completion
November 1, 2014
Last Updated
April 20, 2017
Results First Posted
March 20, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03