Study of Oral IXAZOMIB in Combination With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Phase 1/2 Study of the Oral Formulation of IXAZOMIB (MLN9708), Administered Twice-weekly in Combination With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Requiring Systemic Treatment
2 other identifiers
interventional
64
1 country
20
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) in phase 1 and to determine the combined response rate of clinical response CR and very good partial response (VGPR) in phase 2 of oral (PO) ixazomib administered twice-weekly in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in a 21-day cycle in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDDM).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1 multiple-myeloma
Started Oct 2011
Longer than P75 for phase_1 multiple-myeloma
20 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 27, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 28, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 31, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 13, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 18, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 27, 2017
CompletedMarch 21, 2019
March 1, 2019
3 years
June 27, 2011
November 16, 2015
March 20, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Phase 1: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
MTD was highest dose of ixazomib given with combination drugs, at which \<=1 of 6 participants experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during Cycle 1 of Phase 1. DLT defined as any of following considered possibly related to therapy: Grade 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count \[ANC\] \<500 cell per cubic millimeter \[cells/mm\^3\]) for \>7 days; Grade 3 neutropenia with fever or infection; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia for \>7 days; Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding; platelet count \<10,000/mm\^3; Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy with pain or \>=Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy; \>=Grade 3 nausea/emesis, diarrhea controlled by supportive therapy; any \>=Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity except Grade 3 arthralgia/myalgia; or \<1 week Grade 3 fatigue; delay in initiation of the subsequent therapy cycle by \>14 days; \<=80% lenalidomide doses administered due to other \>=Grade 2 combination study drug-related nonhematologic toxicities requiring therapy discontinuation.
Cycle 1 (21 days)
Phase 1: Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)
The RP2D of ixazomib was determined after the evaluation of the available data from the phase 1 portion of the trial which included, but was not limited to analyses of efficacy results, toxicity characterization, all grades peripheral neuropathy, and treatment discontinuation. The maximum number of cycles received was 83 cycles (approximately up to 2037 days).
Cycle 1 (21 days)
Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Experiencing 1 or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event. A TEAE is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.
Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)
Phase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Laboratory tests included chemistry, hematology and urinalysis. Abnormal laboratory value was assessed as an AE if the value lead to discontinuation or delay in treatment, dose modification, therapeutic intervention, or was considered by the investigator to be a clinically significant change from baseline. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.
Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)
Phase 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Related to Neurotoxicity
TEAE related to neurotoxicity grading based on common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTACE) version 4.03 are reported. Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; within normal limits, Grade 3= severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4= life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death. Only TEAEs related to neurotoxicity with values are reported.
Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)
Phase 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs
Vital signs included body temperature, blood pressure and heart rate.
Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) + Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)
CR as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform criteria is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and \<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR as per IMWG criteria is defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level \<100 mg per 24 hours. VGPR was applicable only to participants who had measurable disease defined by at least 1 of the following 3 measurements: Serum M-protein greater than or equal to (\>=)1 g/dL; Urine M-protein \>=200 mg/24 hours; Serum FLC assay level \>=10 mg/dL, provided serum FLC ratio was abnormal.
Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. As per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE), Grade 3 = AE with severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = AE with life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated and Grade 5 = Death related to AE.
Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 1905 days)
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events
A SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event.
Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 1905 days)
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Resulting in Study Drug Discontinuation
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A TEAE is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.
Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 1905 days)
Secondary Outcomes (19)
Phase 1: Cmax: Maximum Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib
Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11
Phase 1: AUC(0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Postdose for Ixazomib
Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11
Phase 1: Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib
Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11
Phase 1: Rac: Accumulation Ratio of Ixazomib
Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11
Phase 1: Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response
Baseline until end of study treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 83 - approximately 2037 days)
- +14 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3 mg or 3.7 mg
EXPERIMENTALIxazomib (MLN9708), orally, twice-weekly in combination with lenalidomide orally and dexamethasone orally as prescribed, in 21-day treatment cycles for up to 16 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity as induction therapy during Phase 1. Participants with stable or responding disease continued receiving ixazomib (MLN9708) orally, twice weekly in 21-day treatment cycles as maintenance therapy until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
Phase 2: Ixazomib 3 mg
EXPERIMENTALIxazomib (MLN9708), orally, twice-weekly in combination with lenalidomide orally and dexamethasone orally as prescribed, in 21-day treatment cycles for up to 16 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity as induction therapy during Phase 2. Participants with stable or responding disease continued receiving ixazomib (MLN9708) orally, twice weekly in 21-day treatment cycles as maintenance therapy until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female patients 18 years or older
- Symptomatic multiple myeloma or asymptomatic myeloma with myeloma-related organ damage diagnosed according to standard criteria
- Measurable disease as specified in study protocol
- Hematologic, liver, and renal function as specified in the study protocol.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2
- Female patients who are post menopausal, surgically sterile, or agree to practice 2 effective methods of contraception or agree to abstain from heterosexual intercourse; must also adhere to the guidelines of the lenalidomide pregnancy prevention program
- Male patients who agree to practice effective barrier contraception or agree to abstain from heterosexual intercourse AND must adhere to the guidelines of the lenalidomide pregnancy prevention program
- Must be able to take concurrent aspirin 325 mg daily
- Voluntary written consent
You may not qualify if:
- Peripheral neuropathy that is greater or equal to Grade 2
- Female patients who are lactating or pregnant
- Major surgery or radiotherapy within 14 days before the first dose of study drug
- Uncontrolled infection requiring systematic antibiotics within 14 days before the first dose of study drug
- Diarrhea (\> Grade 1)
- Prior systemic therapy for multiple myeloma, including investigational drugs (prior treatment with corticosteroids or localized radiation therapy dose not disqualify the patient)
- Systemic treatment with strong inhibitors of CYP1A2, strong inhibitors of CYP3A, or strong CYP3A inducers, or use of Ginkgo biloba or St. John's wort within 14 days before the first dose of study treatment
- Central nervous system involvement
- Diagnosis of smoldering multiple myeloma, Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, POEMS syndrome, plasma cell leukemia, primary amyloidosis, myelodysplastic syndrome, or myeloproliferative syndrome
- Evidence of current uncontrolled cardiovascular conditions
- Prior or concurrent deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism
- Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive, hepatitis B surface antigen-positive status, or known or suspected active hepatitis C infection
- Serious medical or psychiatric illness that could, in the investigator's opinion, potentially interfere with the completion of treatment according to the protocol
- Known allergy to any of the study medications
- Known gastrointestinal condition or procedure that could interfere with swallowing or the oral absorption, or tolerance of IXAZOMIB
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (20)
UCSF Medical Center
Berkeley, California, 94704, United States
City of Hope National Medical Center
Duarte, California, 91010, United States
Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33612, United States
University of Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
Associates of Oncology/Hematology PC
Rockville, Maryland, 20850, United States
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Michigan State University
Lansing, Michigan, 48910, United States
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10021, United States
Mount Sinai Hospital
New York, New York, 31406, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27705, United States
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Mercy St Anne Hospital
Toledo, Ohio, 43623, United States
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
SCRI Tennessee Oncology Nashville
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States
Baylor Sammons Cancer Center
Dallas, Texas, 75246, United States
Virginia Cancer Care Specialist
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031, United States
Virginia Cancer Specialists PC
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Director
- Organization
- Takeda
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Monitor
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 27, 2011
First Posted
June 28, 2011
Study Start
October 31, 2011
Primary Completion
October 13, 2014
Study Completion
November 27, 2017
Last Updated
March 21, 2019
Results First Posted
December 18, 2015
Record last verified: 2019-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Takeda makes patient-level, de-identified data sets and associated documents available after applicable marketing approvals and commercial availability have been received, an opportunity for the primary publication of the research has been allowed, and other criteria have been met as set forth in Takeda's Data Sharing Policy (see www.TakedaClinicalTrials.com/Approach for details). To obtain access, researchers must submit a legitimate academic research proposal for adjudication by an independent review panel, who will review the scientific merit of the research and the requestor's qualifications and conflict of interest that can result in potential bias. Once approved, qualified researchers who sign a data sharing agreement are provided access to these data in a secure research environment.