NCT01383720

Brief Summary

This is a prospective, single-arm feasibility study designed to assess the acute safety and performance of the Lotus Valve System for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in symptomatic patients with calcified aortic valve stenosis and who are at high risk for surgical intervention.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
11

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2012

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 27, 2011

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 28, 2011

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2012

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2012

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 9, 2016

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 9, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

June 20, 2017

Status Verified

May 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

June 27, 2011

Results QC Date

April 16, 2013

Last Update Submit

May 23, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Aortic Valve StenosisTranscatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Clinical Procedural Success

    Clinical procedural success defined as successful implantation of a Lotus Valve System (Device Success) without in-hospital Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) through discharge or 7 days post-procedure, whichever comes first.

    Discharge or 7 days post-procedure, whichever comes first

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Device Performance Endpoint-Repositioning

    procedure

  • Device Performance Endpoint-Valve Retrieval, if Attempted

    procedure

  • Central Aortic Regurgitation

    Discharge or 7 days post-procedure, whichever comes first

  • Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation

    Discharge or 7 days post-procedure, whichever comes first

Other Outcomes (14)

  • Successful Access, Device Delivery, Deployment and Positioning and Retrieval of Delivery System

    Procedure

  • Intended Performance of the Lotus Valve

    At time of discharge or 7 days post procedure

  • Single Valve Implanted in the Proper Anatomical Location

    procedure

  • +11 more other outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Lotus Valve System

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients enrolled in the study to receive treatment with the Lotus Valve System for symptomatic aortic valve stenosis

Device: Lotus Valve System

Interventions

The Lotus Valve System includes the Lotus Valve, a bovine tissue tri-leaflet bioprosthetic aortic valve, and the Lotus Delivery Catheter for guidance and placement.

Lotus Valve System

Eligibility Criteria

Age70 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient must be at least 70 years of age or older, and meets all of the criteria below.
  • Patient has documented calcified native aortic valve stenosis, defined with an initial aortic valve area (AVA) of \<1.0 cm2 (or AVA index of \<0.6 cm2/m2), and a mean pressure gradient \>40 mmHg or a jet velocity \>4 m/s, as measured by echocardiography.
  • The patient is considered at high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement with an STS (Society of Thoracic Surgeons) score ≥8% or a EuroSCORE ≥20%, or documented multidisciplinary heart team agreement that the patient is at high risk for surgery due to frailty and/or coexisting comorbidities.
  • Symptomatic aortic valve stenosis with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class ≥ II.
  • Patient has a documented aortic annulus size between 19 and 22 mm (able to accommodate the 23 mm Lotus™ Valve). Pre-procedure measurement by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is required. Other imaging modalities (e.g., transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), CT scan) can be used in an adjunctive manner.
  • Patient (or legal representative) understands the trial requirements and the treatment procedures, and provides written informed consent.
  • Patient agrees and is capable of returning to the study hospital for all required scheduled follow up visits.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient has a congenital unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve.
  • Patient with an acute myocardial infarction (MI) within 30 days of the index procedure (defined as Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with total creatine kinase (CK) elevation ≥ twice normal in the presence of CK-MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation (WHO definition)).
  • Patient has had a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the past 6 months, or has any permanent neurologic defect prior to study enrollment.
  • Patient is on dialysis or has serum creatinine level \>3.0 mg/dL.
  • Patient has a pre-existing prosthetic heart valve (aortic or mitral) or a prosthetic ring in any position.
  • Patient has \>2+ mitral regurgitation or \>2+ aortic regurgitation (ie., patient cannot have more than moderate mitral or aortic regurgitation).
  • Moderate to severe pulmonary hypertension (PA systolic pressure \>60 mm Hg) as assessed by transthoracic echocardiography.
  • Patient has a need for emergency surgery for any reason.
  • Patient has a history of endocarditis within 12 months of index procedure or evidence of an active systemic infection or sepsis.
  • Patient has echocardiographic evidence of intra-cardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
  • Patient has Hgb \<9 g/dL, platelet count \<100,000 cells/mm3 or \>700,000 cells/mm3, and white blood cell (WBC) count \<3,000 cells/mm3.
  • Patient is receiving chronic (≥72 hours) anticoagulation therapy (e.g., heparin, warfarin) and who cannot tolerate concomitant therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel (patients who require chronic anticoagulation must be treated with either aspirin or clopidogrel).
  • Patient has active peptic ulcer disease, gastrointestinal (GI) bleed within the past 3 months, other bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or will refuse transfusions.
  • Patient is contraindicated for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE).
  • Patient has known hypersensitivity to contrast agents that cannot be adequately pre-medicated, or has known hypersensitivity to aspirin, all thienopyridines, heparin, nickel, titanium, or polyurethanes.
  • +12 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Royal Adelaide Hospital

Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia

Location

St. Vincent's Hospital

Melbourne, Victoria, 3040, Australia

Location

Southern Health Monash Medical Centre

Melbourne, Victoria, 3168, Australia

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve StenosisAortic Valve, Calcification ofAortic Valve Disease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart Valve DiseasesHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVentricular Outflow Obstruction

Results Point of Contact

Title
Director of Clinical Trials, Valves
Organization
Boston Scientific Corporation

Study Officials

  • Ian Meredith, MBBS, PhD

    Southern Health, Monash Medical Centre

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2011

First Posted

June 28, 2011

Study Start

April 1, 2012

Primary Completion

May 1, 2012

Study Completion

May 9, 2017

Last Updated

June 20, 2017

Results First Posted

May 9, 2016

Record last verified: 2017-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There is no plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available.

Locations