REpositionable Percutaneous Replacement of Stenotic Aortic Valve Through Implantation of Lotus™ Valve SystEm
REPRISE I
1 other identifier
interventional
11
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, single-arm feasibility study designed to assess the acute safety and performance of the Lotus Valve System for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in symptomatic patients with calcified aortic valve stenosis and who are at high risk for surgical intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 27, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 28, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 9, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 9, 2017
CompletedJune 20, 2017
May 1, 2017
1 month
June 27, 2011
April 16, 2013
May 23, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical Procedural Success
Clinical procedural success defined as successful implantation of a Lotus Valve System (Device Success) without in-hospital Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) through discharge or 7 days post-procedure, whichever comes first.
Discharge or 7 days post-procedure, whichever comes first
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Device Performance Endpoint-Repositioning
procedure
Device Performance Endpoint-Valve Retrieval, if Attempted
procedure
Central Aortic Regurgitation
Discharge or 7 days post-procedure, whichever comes first
Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation
Discharge or 7 days post-procedure, whichever comes first
Other Outcomes (14)
Successful Access, Device Delivery, Deployment and Positioning and Retrieval of Delivery System
Procedure
Intended Performance of the Lotus Valve
At time of discharge or 7 days post procedure
Single Valve Implanted in the Proper Anatomical Location
procedure
- +11 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Lotus Valve System
EXPERIMENTALPatients enrolled in the study to receive treatment with the Lotus Valve System for symptomatic aortic valve stenosis
Interventions
The Lotus Valve System includes the Lotus Valve, a bovine tissue tri-leaflet bioprosthetic aortic valve, and the Lotus Delivery Catheter for guidance and placement.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient must be at least 70 years of age or older, and meets all of the criteria below.
- Patient has documented calcified native aortic valve stenosis, defined with an initial aortic valve area (AVA) of \<1.0 cm2 (or AVA index of \<0.6 cm2/m2), and a mean pressure gradient \>40 mmHg or a jet velocity \>4 m/s, as measured by echocardiography.
- The patient is considered at high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement with an STS (Society of Thoracic Surgeons) score ≥8% or a EuroSCORE ≥20%, or documented multidisciplinary heart team agreement that the patient is at high risk for surgery due to frailty and/or coexisting comorbidities.
- Symptomatic aortic valve stenosis with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class ≥ II.
- Patient has a documented aortic annulus size between 19 and 22 mm (able to accommodate the 23 mm Lotus™ Valve). Pre-procedure measurement by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is required. Other imaging modalities (e.g., transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), CT scan) can be used in an adjunctive manner.
- Patient (or legal representative) understands the trial requirements and the treatment procedures, and provides written informed consent.
- Patient agrees and is capable of returning to the study hospital for all required scheduled follow up visits.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient has a congenital unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve.
- Patient with an acute myocardial infarction (MI) within 30 days of the index procedure (defined as Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with total creatine kinase (CK) elevation ≥ twice normal in the presence of CK-MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation (WHO definition)).
- Patient has had a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the past 6 months, or has any permanent neurologic defect prior to study enrollment.
- Patient is on dialysis or has serum creatinine level \>3.0 mg/dL.
- Patient has a pre-existing prosthetic heart valve (aortic or mitral) or a prosthetic ring in any position.
- Patient has \>2+ mitral regurgitation or \>2+ aortic regurgitation (ie., patient cannot have more than moderate mitral or aortic regurgitation).
- Moderate to severe pulmonary hypertension (PA systolic pressure \>60 mm Hg) as assessed by transthoracic echocardiography.
- Patient has a need for emergency surgery for any reason.
- Patient has a history of endocarditis within 12 months of index procedure or evidence of an active systemic infection or sepsis.
- Patient has echocardiographic evidence of intra-cardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
- Patient has Hgb \<9 g/dL, platelet count \<100,000 cells/mm3 or \>700,000 cells/mm3, and white blood cell (WBC) count \<3,000 cells/mm3.
- Patient is receiving chronic (≥72 hours) anticoagulation therapy (e.g., heparin, warfarin) and who cannot tolerate concomitant therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel (patients who require chronic anticoagulation must be treated with either aspirin or clopidogrel).
- Patient has active peptic ulcer disease, gastrointestinal (GI) bleed within the past 3 months, other bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or will refuse transfusions.
- Patient is contraindicated for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE).
- Patient has known hypersensitivity to contrast agents that cannot be adequately pre-medicated, or has known hypersensitivity to aspirin, all thienopyridines, heparin, nickel, titanium, or polyurethanes.
- +12 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia
St. Vincent's Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, 3040, Australia
Southern Health Monash Medical Centre
Melbourne, Victoria, 3168, Australia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director of Clinical Trials, Valves
- Organization
- Boston Scientific Corporation
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ian Meredith, MBBS, PhD
Southern Health, Monash Medical Centre
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 27, 2011
First Posted
June 28, 2011
Study Start
April 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2012
Study Completion
May 9, 2017
Last Updated
June 20, 2017
Results First Posted
May 9, 2016
Record last verified: 2017-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available.