Effect of Ezetimibe Treatment on Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Levels in Participants With Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) Already Treated With a Statin (MK-0653A-205 AM1)
ACT II
Austrian Cholesterol Screening And Treatment II (ACT II)
1 other identifier
observational
1,682
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This non-interventional longitudinal study is a follow-up of the Austrian Cholesterol Screening and Treatment project (ACT I), which assessed the cholesterol status, including achievement of the target levels applicable at that time (LDL levels \<100 mg/dL), in participants with coronary heart disease (CHD) already being treated with a statin. In this study, participants without adequate LDL-cholesterol reduction with a statin underwent extension of therapy with ezetimibe with the goal of achieving target levels.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started May 2009
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 27, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 22, 2012
CompletedFebruary 9, 2022
February 1, 2022
1.6 years
June 23, 2011
November 23, 2011
February 7, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants Achieving Individual LDL Cholesterol (LDL-C) Target Level
Individual LDL-C target values were set according to the Austrian Cholesterol Consensus (ACC) 2007 for patients for patients suffering from coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD equivalent in an office-based, routine medical care setting. Participants were categorized as either high-risk or very high-risk based on ACC criteria. The LDL-C target levels for each category were 100 mg/dL and 70 mg/dL, respectively
Up to 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Month 3
Baseline and Month 3
Change From Baseline in TC at Month 12
Baseline and Month 12
Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Month 3
Baseline and Month 3
Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Month 12
Baseline and Month 12
Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Month 3
Baseline and Month 3
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
All participants
Participants in whom LDL-C target levels have not been achieved and for whom ezetimibe therapy has been chosen.
Interventions
Ezetimibe was not mandatory and was prescribed as per routine prescription by physician.
Eligibility Criteria
Participants without adequate LDL-cholesterol reduction with a statin, representative cross-section across all regions/parts of Austria (federal provinces, urban/rural areas, office-based internists/general practitioners)
You may qualify if:
- Participants in whom LDL-cholesterol target levels have not been achieved.
- Participants in whom a decision has been made by the physician to initiate treatment
- with ezetimibe (longitudinal analyses). The treatment decision will be made prior to
- \- Participants with LDL cholesterol levels ≤113 mg/dl and a very high risk, which led to case-by-case approval of medication may be documented.
You may not qualify if:
- Any condition which, in the opinion of the treating physician, precludes treatment with ezetimibe.
- In order not to interfere with data collection it is recommended not to include participants currently in a clinical trial.
- Previous and ongoing treatment with ezetimibe.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Organon and Colead
Related Publications (2)
Pichler M, Lautsch D, Adler C, Bogl K, Drexel H, Eber B, Fauer C, Fochterle J, Foger B, Gansch K, Grafinger P, Lechleitner M, Ludvik B, Maurer G, Morz R, Paulweber B, Pfeiffer KP, Prager R, Stark G, Toplak H, Traindl O, Weitgasser R. Are there differences in LDL-C target value attainment in Austrian federal states? Yes! Wien Med Wochenschr. 2013 Dec;163(23-24):528-35. doi: 10.1007/s10354-013-0219-z. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
PMID: 23979353DERIVEDEber B, Lautsch D, Fauer C, Drexel H, Pfeiffer KP, Traindl O, Pichler M. Can LDL-cholesterol targets be achieved in a population at high risk? Results of the non-interventional study ACT II. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Sep;28(9):1447-54. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.717919. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
PMID: 22856551DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
- Organization
- Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2011
First Posted
June 27, 2011
Study Start
May 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Study Completion
December 1, 2010
Last Updated
February 9, 2022
Results First Posted
March 22, 2012
Record last verified: 2022-02