Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the OPTIMIZER® System in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Heart Failure: FIX-HF-5C
FIX-HF-5C
Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of the OPTIMIZER® System in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Heart Failure With Ejection Fraction Between 25% and 45%: FIX-HF-5C
2 other identifiers
interventional
160
3 countries
42
Brief Summary
The objective of this investigation is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the OPTIMIZER® System in subjects with medically refractory moderate-to-severe heart failure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
42 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 22, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 27, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 19, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 19, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 17, 2021
CompletedSeptember 17, 2021
August 1, 2021
8.2 years
June 22, 2011
April 20, 2020
August 23, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Peak VO2
Exercise tolerance quantified by peak VO2 measured with cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPX) and evaluated by a blinded core lab.
24 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire
24 weeks
Peak VO2 With Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER)
24 weeks
NYHA
24 weeks
Peak VO2 With a Peak RER of ≥1.05
24 weeks
Other Outcomes (2)
6 Minute Hall Walk
24 weeks
VE/VCO2
24 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Treatment
EXPERIMENTALThe treatment group receives the OPTIMIZER System implant and continues with optimal heart failure medical therapy.
Control
OTHERThe Control group will not receive the OPTIMIZER System and will continue with optimal heart failure medical therapy.
Interventions
The OPTIMIZER System delivers non-excitatory cardiac contractility modulating (CCM) electrical signals to the heart muscle. Treatment group subjects receive five non-contiguous one-hour periods of CCM signals per day.
The control group receives optimal medical therapy only.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects who are 18 years of age or older
- Subjects who are either male or female. Females of childbearing potential must be using a medically approved method of birth control and must agree to continue to use birth control throughout the study, or must be surgically sterilized (tubal ligation, hysterectomy) or post-menopausal for at least 1 year.
- Condition
- Subjects who have a baseline ejection fraction greater than or equal to 25% and less than or equal to 45% by echocardiography determined by the echocardiography core laboratory.
- Subjects who have been treated for heart failure for at least 90 days (including treatment with a β-blocker for at least 90 days unless the subject is intolerant) and are in New York Heart Association functional Class III and IV at the time of enrollment.
- Subjects receiving appropriate, stable medical therapy during the 30 days prior to enrollment for treatment of heart failure according to the region- specific guideline recommendations. For patients with EF≤35%, this regimen shall consist of the appropriate doses of diuretics, ACE-inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker and β-blocker. Stable is defined as no more than a 100% increase or 50% decrease in dose.
- Subjects who, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator (based on the current guidelines for clinical practice ), have a clinical indication for an implanted cardiac defibrillator (ICD, e.g., EF≤35%) and/or pacemaker, must have an existing device or agree to undergo implantation of such a device unless the patient refuses to undergo the implantation of such device for personal reasons.
- Subjects who are willing and able to return for all follow-up visits.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects whose baseline peak VO2 is \<9 or \>20 ml O2/min/kg.
- Subjects who have a potentially correctible cause of heart failure, such as valvular heart disease or congenital heart disease.
- Subjects who have clinically significant angina pectoris, consisting of angina during daily life (i.e., Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina score of II or more), an episode of unstable angina within 30 days of enrollment, or angina and/or ECG changes during exercise testing performed during baseline evaluation.
- Subjects who have been hospitalized for heart failure which required the use of inotropic support within 30 days of enrollment.
- Subjects who have a clinically significant amount of ambient ectopy, defined as more than 8,900 PVCs per 24 hours on baseline Holter monitoring.
- Subjects having a PR interval greater than 375 ms.
- Subjects who have chronic (permanent or persistent) atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter or those cardioverted within 30 days of enrollment.
- Subjects whose exercise tolerance is limited by a condition other than heart failure (e.g., angina, COPD, peripheral vascular disease, orthopedic or rheumatologic conditions) or who are unable to perform baseline stress testing.
- Subjects who are scheduled for a CABG or a PTCA procedure, or who have undergone a CABG procedure within 90 days or a PTCA procedure within 30 days of enrollment.
- Subjects who have a biventricular pacing system, an accepted indication for such a device, or a QRS width of 130ms or greater.
- Subjects who have had a myocardial infarction within 90 days of enrollment.
- Subjects who have mechanical tricuspid valve.
- Subjects who have a prior heart transplant.
- Subjects on dialysis.
- Subjects who are participating in another experimental protocol.
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Impulse Dynamicslead
Study Sites (42)
Cardiovascular Consultants
Glendale, Arizona, 85306, United States
Cardiovascular Associates of Mesa
Mesa, Arizona, 85206, United States
Chan Heart Rhythm Institute
Mesa, Arizona, 85206, United States
Arizona Heart & Rhythm Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013, United States
Pima Heart
Tucson, Arizona, 85712, United States
University of Arizona Sarver Heart Center
Tucson, Arizona, 85724, United States
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
Newport Beach, California, 92663, United States
Yale - New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, 06519, United States
Florida Hospital
Orlando, Florida, 32803, United States
Florida Hospital - Pepin Heart Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33613, United States
Advocate Medical Group - Midwest Heart Foundation
Naperville, Illinois, 60540, United States
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
Baptist Health Lexington
Lexington, Kentucky, 40503, United States
Ochsner Clinic
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121, United States
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
Washington Adventist Hospital
Takoma Park, Maryland, 20912, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
St. Elizabeth's Medical Center
Brighton, Massachusetts, 02135, United States
Detroit Medical Center - Cardiovascular Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States
Nebraska Heart Institute
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68526, United States
Bryan Heart LGH
Lincoln, Nebraska, 69506, United States
UMDNJ
Newark, New Jersey, 07103, United States
Mt. Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029, United States
The Lindner Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States
The Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Guthrie Medical Group
Sayre, Pennsylvania, 18840, United States
Spartanburg Regional Medical Center
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303, United States
Stern Cardiovascular Foundation
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138, United States
Dallas VA Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75216, United States
Trinity Clinic
Tyler, Texas, 75701, United States
Inova Heart & Vascular Institute
Falls Church, Virginia, 22042, United States
Aurora Health Care
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215, United States
Na Homolce Hospital
Prague, 15030, Czechia
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
Hanover, Göttingen, 37075, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Essen
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45122, Germany
Herz- und Gefässzentrum Bad Bevensen
Bad Bevensen, 29549, Germany
Charité Berlin - Campus Benjamin Franklin
Berlin, 12203, Germany
Charité Campus-Virchow-Klinikum
Berlin, 13353, Germany
ASKLEPIOS Klinik St. Georg
Hamburg, 20099, Germany
UKE - Universitäres Herzzentrum GmbH
Hamburg, 20246, Germany
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
Mannheim, 68167, Germany
Klinikum der Univ. München - Grosshadern
München, 81377, Germany
Related Publications (6)
Kadish A, Nademanee K, Volosin K, Krueger S, Neelagaru S, Raval N, Obel O, Weiner S, Wish M, Carson P, Ellenbogen K, Bourge R, Parides M, Chiacchierini RP, Goldsmith R, Goldstein S, Mika Y, Burkhoff D, Abraham WT. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in advanced heart failure. Am Heart J. 2011 Feb;161(2):329-337.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.10.025.
PMID: 21315216BACKGROUNDAbraham WT, Burkhoff D, Nademanee K, Carson P, Bourge R, Ellenbogen KA, Parides M, Kadish A; FIX-HF-5 Investigators and Coordinators. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in patients with systolic heart failure: rationale, design, and baseline patient characteristics. Am Heart J. 2008 Oct;156(4):641-648.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.05.019.
PMID: 18926146BACKGROUNDNeelagaru SB, Sanchez JE, Lau SK, Greenberg SM, Raval NY, Worley S, Kalman J, Merliss AD, Krueger S, Wood M, Wish M, Burkhoff D, Nademanee K. Nonexcitatory, cardiac contractility modulation electrical impulses: feasibility study for advanced heart failure in patients with normal QRS duration. Heart Rhythm. 2006 Oct;3(10):1140-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.06.031. Epub 2006 Jul 8.
PMID: 17018340BACKGROUNDAbraham WT, Nademanee K, Volosin K, Krueger S, Neelagaru S, Raval N, Obel O, Weiner S, Wish M, Carson P, Ellenbogen K, Bourge R, Parides M, Chiacchierini RP, Goldsmith R, Goldstein S, Mika Y, Burkhoff D, Kadish A; FIX-HF-5 Investigators and Coordinators. Subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in advanced heart failure. J Card Fail. 2011 Sep;17(9):710-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2011.05.006. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
PMID: 21872139BACKGROUNDAbraham WT, Lindenfeld J, Reddy VY, Hasenfuss G, Kuck KH, Boscardin J, Gibbons R, Burkhoff D; FIX-HF-5C Investigators and Coordinators. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in patients with moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and a narrow QRS duration: study rationale and design. J Card Fail. 2015 Jan;21(1):16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2014.09.011. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
PMID: 25285748BACKGROUNDAbraham WT, Kuck KH, Goldsmith RL, Lindenfeld J, Reddy VY, Carson PE, Mann DL, Saville B, Parise H, Chan R, Wiegn P, Hastings JL, Kaplan AJ, Edelmann F, Luthje L, Kahwash R, Tomassoni GF, Gutterman DD, Stagg A, Burkhoff D, Hasenfuss G. A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Cardiac Contractility Modulation. JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Oct;6(10):874-883. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 May 10.
PMID: 29754812BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sr. Director, Clinical and Data Operations
- Organization
- Impulse Dynamics (USA) Inc
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Daniel Burkhoff, MD, PhD
Impulse Dynamics
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 22, 2011
First Posted
June 27, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
March 19, 2019
Study Completion
March 19, 2019
Last Updated
September 17, 2021
Results First Posted
September 17, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08