Improvement in Pain,Function and HRQoL ( Health Related Quality of Life) in Subacute Low Back Pain: A Controlled Clinical Trial of Exercise vs NSAIDs (Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory)
DLSEA
Improvement in Pain, Function and Quality of Life With a Protocolized Exercise Program Compared With Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Analgesics in Patients With Subacute Low Back Pain in Medellín, Colombia, 2009-2010
2 other identifiers
interventional
90
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Our clinical trial has the purpose to evaluate the effectiveness in reducing pain and improving function and quality of life during a 6-months follow-up of a therapeutic exercise program compared to pharmacological treatment with NSAIDs in patients with subacute low back pain attending the physiatrist consultation of several ambulatory health centers in Medellín during the years 2009-2010.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jun 2009
Typical duration for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 14, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 15, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 29, 2014
CompletedApril 29, 2014
March 1, 2014
2.3 years
June 14, 2011
September 20, 2013
March 18, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Visual Analogue Scale of Pain
In the Visual Analogue Sacale the best result is 0 and the worst is 100, The primary outcome was pain the mesurement of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0 \[no pain\] to 100 \[maximum pain\]) at the beginning.
At the beginning
Visual Analogue Scale of Pain
In the VAS the best result is 0 and the worst is 100. The primary outcome was pain improvement of ≥25 mm on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0 \[no pain\] to 100 \[maximum pain\]) at 4 weeks.
4 weeks
Visual Analogue Scale of Pain
In the VAS the best result is 0 and the worst is 100. The primary outcome was pain improvement of ≥25 mm on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0 \[no pain\] to 100 \[maximum pain\]) at 12 weeks.
12 weeks
Visual Analogue Scale of Pain
The best result is 0 and the worst is 100, Pain relief more than 25 mm on the Visual Analogue Scale, assessed 24 weeks after intervention.
24 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (58)
Oswestry Disability Index
At the beginning
Oswestry Disability Index
4 weeks
Oswestry Disability Index
12 weeks
Oswestry Disability Index
24 weeks
Roland-Morris Questionnaire
At the beginning
- +53 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Excercise
EXPERIMENTALOne group will be assigned to protocolized back pain exercise, three times a week for 4 weeks. This program is carried out by physiotherapists from participating institutions who wish to participate in research and who will be given a training which will standardize the intervention programs Exercise program includes: physical agents, massage of myofascial points, stretching and strengthening exercises, cycloergometer or band aerobic exercises. Treatment, type of exercises, exercise tolerance and adverse reactions will be registered
NSAID
ACTIVE COMPARATORNaproxen 500 mg per day by 10 days or Celecoxib 200 mg per day by 10 days and Acetaminophen 1,5 a 2 g as rescue
Interventions
Standardize the intervention programs Exercise program includes: physical agents, massage of myofascial points, stretching and strengthening exercises, cycloergometer or band aerobic exercises. 12 sessions, 3 per week.
The second group was treated for 10 days with NSAIDs (naproxen 500 mg/d or celecoxib 200 mg/d) according to the indications and contraindications. The patients kept a journal stating whether they had taken the drug and any adverse reactions. If the pain intensity of any participant increased, acetaminophen (1.5 - 2.0 g/d) was proposed as a rescue procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged between 18 and 60 years old
- Subacute low back pain -evolution time more than 4 weeks and less than 3 months.
- That have social security system
- Live in the metropolitan area
You may not qualify if:
- Antecedents of spinal, pelvis or abdominal trauma
- Cancer
- Diabetes mellitus
- Steroids use
- Men and Women over 60 years
- Cauda equine syndrome
- Women and men with osteoporosis or compression fractures
- Suspicion of infection.
- Insidious onset, constitutional symptoms
- Intravenous drugs abuse
- HIV
- Immunosuppression or previous surgery
- Rheumatic diseases
- Urinary tract infections
- Neurological symptoms in lower limbs
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Grupo Rehabilitacion en Saludlead
- Universidad de Antioquiacollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Clínica de Las Américas
Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
Ips Universitaria
Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study population was associated with the university's health service. Female subjects predominated. The 6-month follow-up prevents conclusions about the improvement duration. No subgroup classification was performed. No control group was planned.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Fabio Salinas Duran
- Organization
- Grupo Rehabilitacion en Salud
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Luz H Lugo, Professor
Universidad de Antioquia
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 14, 2011
First Posted
June 15, 2011
Study Start
June 1, 2009
Primary Completion
October 1, 2011
Study Completion
March 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 29, 2014
Results First Posted
April 29, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-03