Maitland Mobilization vs. McKenzie Press-Up in Chronic LBP
LBP
Comparative Efficacy of Maitland Mobilization vs. McKenzie Press-Up in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
ABSTRACT Objective:This study aimed to compare the efficacy of central posteroanterior (PA) Maitland mobilization with myofascial release (MFR) and McKenzie prone press-up (PPU) exercise with MFR in the treatment of adult patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP). Materials and Methods:A randomized controlled trial was conducted at Salhab Center and Al Shifa's Specialized Complex in Bethlehem between January 2023 and May 2024. The study included 50 adult patients (aged 18-50) with CNLBP of more than 3 months but less than 2 years' duration, referred by an orthopedic specialist at Beit Sahour Medical Center. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: one received central PA Maitland mobilization with MFR, and the other received McKenzie PPU exercise with MFR. Pain intensity, functional impairment, and fear-avoidance beliefs were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Each patient underwent three sessions per week for four weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 3, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 23, 2026
CompletedJanuary 23, 2026
January 1, 2026
4 months
January 3, 2026
January 16, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Oswestry Disability Index
0% (no disability) to 100% (severe disability)
4 WEEKS
Other Outcomes (2)
Visual Analogu Scale
4 WEEKS
Fear-Avoidance Belief Questionnaire
4 WEEKS
Study Arms (2)
Arm 1- Group A :Central PA Maitland mobilization with MFR
EXPERIMENTALCentral PA Maitland mobilization with MFR
Arm 2- Group B:McKenzie PPU exercise with MFR
EXPERIMENTALPatient position: The patient assumes a prone position. investigator position: The investigator stands beside the patient and provides verbal instruction. Direction: Patients were being instructed to perform PPU exercise by using their upper limbs to push their upper body up into spinal extension while the pelvis remained on the treatment table. The patient is trained to extend the lumbar spine to the maximum pain-free range. Frequency: Ten repetitions for three sets with a 30-second break between each set for almost 10 minutes \[27\].
Interventions
Patient position: The patient assumes a prone position. Therapist position: The therapist stands beside the patient and provides verbal instruction. Direction: Patients were being instructed to perform PPU exercise by using their upper limbs to push their upper body up into spinal extension while the pelvis remained on the treatment table. The patient is trained to extend the lumbar spine to the maximum pain-free range. Frequency: Ten repetitions for three sets with a 30-second break between each set for almost 10 minutes
According to Maitland's concept, mobilization technique including passive accessory intervertebral movement was applied to cause movement in the stiff vertebral segment without the active involvement of the muscles \[44\]. Central PA mobilization technique is a cornerstone of Maitland vertebral mobilization \[38\]. It can be achieved by passive force onto a vertebral segment in the PA direction \[44\]. Patient position: When applying this technique, the patient assumes a relaxed and comfortable prone position, with the arms positioned alongside the body \[23, 24\]. investigator position: The investigator stands close to the patient, with their sternum perpendicular to the selected lumbar spinous process \[23\]. The investigator uses the ulnar surface of the hand (pisiform) over the selected spinous process in the lumbar spine, another hand taken was placed above the first hand to reinforce, and the elbow should slightly bent with forearm in neutral between supination \& pronation.
Patient position: The patient assumes a prone position. investigator position: The investigator stands beside the patient and provides verbal instruction. Direction: Patients were being instructed to perform PPU exercise by using their upper limbs to push their upper body up into spinal extension while the pelvis remained on the treatment table. The patient is trained to extend the lumbar spine to the maximum pain-free range. Frequency: Ten repetitions for three sets with a 30-second break between each set for almost 10 minutes
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- and 50 years of age,
- Male or female, with NSLBP localized between the lower rib and the gluteal fold
- Persisting for more than three months and occurring on at least half of the days in the past three months, with pain affecting daily functional activities.
- VAS score between 40 mm and 80 mm at the initial assessment
- No use of NSAID medications during treatment sessions.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients younger than 18 or older than 50 years,
- Those with mental health disorders, systemic or neurological diseases, or specific spinal pathologies such as facet joint dysfunction, piriformis syndrome, disc herniation, spinal tumors, spondylitis, spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, or spinal osteoporosis. Patients were also excluded if they had contraindications to mobilization, a history of spinal surgery or epidural injections, physiotherapy for LBP within the last six months, a VAS score outside the 40-80 mm range, pregnancy, or a current upper limb injury.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Palestine Ahliya University
Bethlehem, West Bank, P150, Palestinian Territories
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chairperson, Department of Medical Sciences - Master's
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 3, 2026
First Posted
January 23, 2026
Study Start
December 1, 2023
Primary Completion
April 1, 2024
Study Completion
May 1, 2024
Last Updated
January 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share