Study: Study to Compare Video Miller Device to Direct Laryngoscopy
A Randomized, Prospective Study to Compare the Video Miller Device to Direct Laryngoscopy Using a Standard Pediatric Miller Blade for Tracheal Intubation of Children < 3 Years of Age Undergoing General Anesthesia
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare: the standard pediatric intubation instrument (Miller blade) used as direct laryngoscopy during tracheal intubation to the VideoMiller device (the standard pediatric blade with a camera attached, giving indirect view of the vocal cords in the screen). This intubation device is used to place the tube in the trachea to keep the patient breathing during the surgery procedure. The anesthesiologist obtains a better view of the vocal cords looking at the screen provided by the VideoMiller.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 9, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 10, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 21, 2021
CompletedSeptember 21, 2021
August 1, 2021
4.5 years
June 9, 2011
July 8, 2021
August 25, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Time to Obtain Glottic View
Time to obtain glottic view (from initial insertion of laryngoscope blade to obtain glottic view)
Times following initial insertion of laryngoscope blade to obtain glottic view
Intubation Time
Times following initial insertion of laryngoscope blade to placement of tracheal tube
Times from insertion of laryngoscope blade to placement of tracheal tube
Time From Insertion of Laryngoscope Blade to Confirm w/ CO2 Waveform
Time following initial insertion of laryngoscope blade to confirm w/ CO2 waveform
Time from initial insertion of laryngoscope blade to confirm w/ CO2 waveform
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Glottis Visualization Using POGO Score
During intubation procedure, up to 3 minutes
Glottis Visualization Using Cormack Lehane
During intubation procedure, up to 3 minutes
Number of Participants Intubated With 1 and > 1 Intubation Attempts
During intubation procedure, up to 3 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Video-Miller laryngoscope
ACTIVE COMPARATORusing the screen (Video laryngoscopy group)
Direct laryngoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORwithout use the screen (Direct laryngoscopy group)
Interventions
Video-Miller laryngoscope, using the screen (Video laryngoscopy group)
Video-Miller laryngoscope, without screen (Direct laryngoscopy group)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 3 years or younger undergoing anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation.
- Obtaining signed the informed consent by their parents or legal guardian.
- American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I - II or III
You may not qualify if:
- Patients deemed to be at significant airway risk necessitating an awake fiber optic intubation
- Patients with facial abnormalities, and/or oral-pharyngeal malformation.
- Emergency operation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cedars Sinai Medical center
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
Related Publications (1)
Lingappan K, Neveln N, Arnold JL, Fernandes CJ, Pammi M. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 12;5(5):CD009975. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009975.pub4.
PMID: 37171122DERIVED
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Roya Yumul, MD, PhD
- Organization
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Roya Yumul, MD,PhD
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
- STUDY CHAIR
Ronald H Wender, MD
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Residency program director, Department of anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 9, 2011
First Posted
June 10, 2011
Study Start
June 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
September 21, 2021
Results First Posted
September 21, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08