Regional Citrate Anticoagulation in Plasma Exchange Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators want to compare the efficacy of plasma exchange treatment with using two different citrates ( 4% and 15% ) as anticoagulants in plasma exchange treatment. The efficacy of plasma exchange treatment is better with using 15% trisodium citrate as anticoagulant during the plasma exchange procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 2, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 9, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedMay 27, 2015
May 1, 2015
3.7 years
June 2, 2011
May 26, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The efficacy of plasma exchange, measuring immunoglobulins type G before and after the procedure, using 4% and 15% citrate as anticoagulants
the whole trial, approximately 3 years
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The percentage of patients in whom there is a 50% reduction of immunoglobulins after plasma exchange using 4% and 15% citrate as anticoagulants
the whole trial, approximately 3 years
Using 15% citrate as an anticoagulant during plasma exchange treatment is as safe as using 4% citrate as anticoagulant during plasma exchange treatment.
the whole trial, approximately 3 years
Study Arms (2)
4% citrate
ACTIVE COMPARATOR4% trisodium citrate, starting infusion rate 180 ml/h Interventions according to postfilter ionized calcium, change in 10 ml/h step
15% citrate
ACTIVE COMPARATOR15% trisodium citrate, starting infusion rate 50 ml/h Interventions according to postfilter ionized calcium, change in 10 ml/h step
Interventions
the therapeutic plasma exchange is the procedure of removing the plasma of the patient including pathological macromolecules and replacing it with the replacement fluid
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients who need plasma exchange treatment
- human albumins as a replacement fluid
You may not qualify if:
- anemia Hb less than 90
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Center for acute and complicated dialysis, Clinical department of nephrology, UMC Ljubljana
Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia
Related Publications (1)
Antonic M, Gubensek J, Buturovic-Ponikvar J, Ponikvar R. Comparison of citrate anticoagulation during plasma exchange with different replacement solutions. Ther Apher Dial. 2009 Aug;13(4):322-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2009.00733.x.
PMID: 19695068BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Manja Antonič, MD
Center for acute and complicated dialysis, UMCLjubljana
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2011
First Posted
June 9, 2011
Study Start
April 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
May 27, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-05