Ketamine Anesthesia in Electroconvulsive Therapy
A Randomized Comparison of Ketamine and Methohexital Anesthesia for Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) in Depression
1 other identifier
interventional
38
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Does the use of ketamine as the anesthetic medication in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) accelerate the antidepressant effect of ECT? The study hypothesis was that depressed subjects receiving ECT with ketamine as the anesthetic agent would demonstrate a faster rate of improvement, defined as lower depression ratings after the second ECT than depressed patients receiving ECT with the usual anesthetic agent.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable depression
Started May 2011
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable depression
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 6, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 6, 2013
CompletedAugust 8, 2013
August 1, 2013
10 months
June 1, 2011
March 18, 2013
August 5, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean Depression Rating Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
The HADS is a fourteen item scale. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 (no symptoms) and 42 (severe symptoms) for either anxiety or depression. The questionnaire was administered to the subjects prior to the first treatment, the morning of the third treatment, the morning of the fifth treatment, and the morning of the seventh treatment. For subjects whose treatment series ws cancelled prior to a scheduled next administration of the rating scale, every effort was made to administer them 2 days after the last treatment. Means are reported overall across all treatments; p-values also take into account variability across treatments and within subject.
Baseline and after every second treatment for 7 treatments
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Mean Depression Rating Using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Baseline and after every second treatment for 7 treatments
Mean Post Anesthesia Recovery Side Effects
Time of discharge from recovery after ECT for each treatment, approximately 30 minutes after the end of the seizure
Study Arms (2)
Ketamine
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects were dosed with approximately 1.0 mg/kg, using ketamine as anesthetic prior to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).
Methohexital
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects were dosed with approximately 1.0 mg/kg, using methohexital as anesthetic prior to electroconvulsive therapy.
Interventions
Subjects were dosed with approximately 1.0 mg/kg, using ketamine as anesthetic.
Subjects were dosed with approximately 1.0 mg/kg, using methohexital as anesthetic.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of depression, either unipolar or bipolar
- Subjects receiving ECT at the Mayo Clinic
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects not giving their own consent to ECT
- Subjects with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or dementia
- Subjects diagnosed with a major neurological disorder such as epilepsy, Parkinson disease, multiple sclerosis, or a neurodegenerative dementia.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Keith G. Rassmussen
- Organization
- Mayo Clinic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Keith Rasmussen, MD
Mayo Clinic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 1, 2011
First Posted
June 6, 2011
Study Start
May 1, 2011
Primary Completion
March 1, 2012
Study Completion
March 1, 2012
Last Updated
August 8, 2013
Results First Posted
August 6, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-08