Evaluation of an Antidepressant Pharmacogenomic Algorithm in an Outpatient Clinical Setting
A Pilot Study for the Evaluation of the Clinic-wide Impact of the Antidepressant Pharmacogenomic Algorithm in an Outpatient Clinical Setting
1 other identifier
interventional
227
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This was a study of a genotyping tool that reported on how subjects responded to medications and could be used in a community psychiatry practice to improve medication choice for depression. After the DNA test, an interpretive report was provided to the subjects' physicians. The hypothesis of this pilot study was that it was feasible to use this pharmacogenomic algorithm in a new setting to treat depressed subjects..
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable depression
Started Jan 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable depression
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 25, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 30, 2017
CompletedMarch 30, 2017
February 1, 2017
2.8 years
May 25, 2012
August 18, 2016
February 10, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-C16) Score From Baseline
The QIDS-C16 is a 16-item scale that is clinician-rated; it is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS-C16 total score ranges from 0-27. Scores ranging from 0 to 10 correspond with no to mild depression, while scores \>/= 11 correspond to moderate to severe depression. A negative change indicates improvement in the subject's depression, and a positive change indicates a worsening of the subject's depression.
baseline, 8-week visit
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Percentage Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Score From Baseline
baseline, 8-week visit
Percentage Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score From Baseline
baseline, 8-week visit
Percentage Change in Outcome by Bin Status and Treatment Group
baseline, 8-week visit
Pharmacogenomic Report Utilization
baseline, 8-week visit
Physicians' Perception of Participant's Satisfaction With Their Care
8-week visit
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Guided
EXPERIMENTALA pharmacogenomic algorithm (GeneSight) guided treatment decisions for antidepressant medication selection and appropriate dosing.
Unguided
NO INTERVENTIONTreatment as usual
Interventions
Genetic test results for 4 genes were put through algorithm and provided to physician for guidance prescribing medication.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient is between the ages of 18 and 80.
- Major depressive disorder or depressive disorder not otherwise specified as ascertained by a physician or mental health professional licensed to diagnose.
- Patient is an outpatient and not in imminent need of inpatient hospitalization, or a discharging inpatient with scheduled follow-up with a Behavioral Health psychiatrist.
- Patient has been referred to see a psychiatrist for optimum medication management.
- Patient's Hamilton Depression Rating score is \>14
- Ability to read, understand and sign an informed consent document
You may not qualify if:
- Serious medical illness (as ascertained via the initial triage screening process)
- Patients with a diagnosis of Bipolar I disorder
- Patients with a diagnosis of Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective disorder
- Patients who are legally unable to consent to enrollment in the study (i.e. patients with legal guardians)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
- Assurex Health Homecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Franciscan Skemp HealthCare
La Crosse, Wisconsin, 54601, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Daniel K. Hall-Flavin
- Organization
- Mayo Clinic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel K. Hall-Flavin
Mayo Clinic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PI
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 25, 2012
First Posted
June 1, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion
November 1, 2011
Study Completion
May 1, 2013
Last Updated
March 30, 2017
Results First Posted
March 30, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share