NCT01363765

Brief Summary

Diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) is a challenge because sputum smear, the most rapid and inexpensive test, often fails to detect the disease, in around 20 to 30% of cases. Culture of sputum yields a correct diagnosis in up to 90% of cases, but results are only available in 4 to 8 weeks, depending on the method. A new test (Xpert MTB/Rif) based on a rapid technique, named polymerase chain reaction (PCR), detects TB in less than 2 hours over 95% of cases, in addition to identification of cases resistant to certain drugs used to treat TB. The test is expensive, but several studies have demonstrated its accuracy, and since most steps are automatized, savings can be expected from human resources work. The aims of our study are (1) to evaluate this tool as a substitute test for sputum smears in routine conditions; (2) evaluate if it is cost-effective, meaning that effectiveness of the test may outweigh the extra cost, and (3) evaluate the acceptability of the test among patients and health care workers.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
34,758

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2012

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 27, 2011

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 2, 2011

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2012

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2012

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 12, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

March 12, 2014

Status Verified

March 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

May 27, 2011

Results QC Date

August 5, 2013

Last Update Submit

March 11, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

diagnosispolymerase chain reactionsputum smearstepped-wedge designcost-effectivenessXpert MTB/Rif

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Notification Rate Ratio

    Proportion of additional bacteriologically confirmed notified TB cases during intervention period compared to the observation period Patients notified who had a positive test result. The notification rate (NR, i.e., number of notifications/100,000 population/year) ratio (NRR) is defined as the NR in the intervention period/NR in the observation period, and is presented in the statistical analysis section.

    October 2012 (up to 2 years)

  • Costs Per Detected Case

    Costs per detected case were analyzed using a decision tree model from the national health system perspective. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as (costs with Xpert - costs with smears)/(cases detected with Xpert - cases detected with smears). Negative ICERs mean cost saving.

    October 2012 (up to 2 years)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • NRR of Non-laboratory Tested TB (Cluster-averaged).

    October 2012 (up to 2 years)

  • NRR of Negative-laboratory TB (Cluster-averaged).

    October 2012 (up to 2 years)

Study Arms (2)

Xpert MTB/Rif

EXPERIMENTAL

Sputum specimens arriving during intervention period will be submitted to this technology, a real-time automated polymerase chain reaction test

Other: Xpert MTB/Rif

Sputum smear

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Sputum smears arriving in the laboratory during the observation period will be submitted to the classic routine smear staining

Other: Smear microscopy

Interventions

Automatized RT-PCR for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the agent of TB, in sputum samples

Also known as: Intervention period
Xpert MTB/Rif

Sputum smears arriving in the laboratory during the observation period will be submitted to the classic routine smear staining. This would be the non-intervention (control) arm.

Also known as: Observation
Sputum smear

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Laboratories of Rio de Janeiro Health Department

Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 22000, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Trajman A, Durovni B, Saraceni V, Menezes A, Cordeiro-Santos M, Cobelens F, Van den Hof S. Impact on Patients' Treatment Outcomes of XpertMTB/RIF Implementation for the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis: Follow-Up of a Stepped-Wedge Randomized Clinical Trial. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 27;10(4):e0123252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123252. eCollection 2015.

  • Durovni B, Saraceni V, van den Hof S, Trajman A, Cordeiro-Santos M, Cavalcante S, Menezes A, Cobelens F. Impact of replacing smear microscopy with Xpert MTB/RIF for diagnosing tuberculosis in Brazil: a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial. PLoS Med. 2014 Dec 9;11(12):e1001766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001766. eCollection 2014 Dec.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

TuberculosisDisease

Interventions

Observation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mycobacterium InfectionsActinomycetales InfectionsGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsBacterial InfectionsBacterial Infections and MycosesInfectionsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

MethodsInvestigative Techniques

Limitations and Caveats

The design has potential for bias, due to delayed treatment effects or to conditions that change over time. Both are unlikely: outcome (notification) was shortly after test and adjustment for time in multilevel mixed model confirmed primary analysis.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Anete Trajman
Organization
InCo-TB project, Gama Filho University

Study Officials

  • Frank Cobelens, MD, PhD

    AIGHD Foundation and Department of Global Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2011

First Posted

June 2, 2011

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion

October 1, 2012

Study Completion

October 1, 2012

Last Updated

March 12, 2014

Results First Posted

March 12, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-03

Locations