2nd Pivotal Study rPhleum - Adults and Adolescents With Rhinoconjunctivitis +/-Controlled Asthma
Randomised Double Blind Placebo Controlled Pivotal Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of rPhleum in Adult and Adolescent Patients Suffering From Rhinoconjunctivitis +/- Controlled Asthma
2 other identifiers
interventional
195
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To evaluate efficacy and tolerability of specific subcutaneous immunotherapy with a cocktail of recombinant major allergens of Timothy Grass Pollen (Phleum pratense) in subjects with rhinoconjunctivitis caused by grass pollen with/without controlled asthma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Oct 2009
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 13, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 16, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2014
CompletedNovember 13, 2014
November 1, 2014
2.8 years
May 13, 2011
November 12, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom-Medication-Score
Change of the AUC of the RC-SMS from the baseline season to the season after 2 years of treatment
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
adverse events
entire trial
Study Arms (2)
recombinant Phleum (rPhleum) allergen cocktail
EXPERIMENTALThe recombinant Phleum (rPhleum) allergen cocktail is prepared by mixing equivalent volumes of each single allergen adsorbate. The recombinant Phleum (rPhleum) allergen cocktail contains Phleum pratense (Phl p) allergens: Type 1, 2, 5 and 6 at equimolar quatities. The total protein concentration in the highest strength is 200μg protein per 1mL aluminium hydroxide suspension.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo will be administered in the same way as the test product. Placebo will be identical in terms of appearance to the IMP.
Interventions
* Strength 1 (0.78μg/mL) * Strength 2 (6.25μg/mL) * Strength 3 (50μg/mL) * Strength 4 (200μg/mL) The subcutaneous injections will be administered at intervals of 7 (+ 7 days)during up-titration. For maintenance the injection intervals are prolonged to 4 weeks (+2). The double blind treatment period is 2 years, followed by 1 year open-label treatment for patients previously treated with verum and 3 years open-label treatment for patients previously recieved placebo.
Placebo will be administered in the same way as the test product. Placebo will be identical in terms of appearance to the IMP.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Has the subject given informed consent according to local requirements before any trial-related activities?
- Is the subject a legally competent male or female outpatient?
- Is the subject aged 12 - 65 year?
- Does the subject suffer from IgE-mediated seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma (controlled, acc. to GINA 2006) caused by grass pollen documented by
- skin prick test wheal for grass pollen ≥ 5mm in diameter and
- histamine (1,0% histamindihydrochloride ) wheal ≥ 3mm and
- NaCl control reaction \< 3mm and
- EAST result (inhouse Allergopharma) ≥ 1.5kU/L to grass pollens and
- proven clinical relevance of grass pollen allergy by positive conjunctival provocation testing with grass pollen allergens and
- main discomfort in the respective months.
- Does the subject with bronchial asthma at entry have a confirmed diagnosis of asthma and does his asthma has been classified as "controlled" according to GINA guidelines (version 2006) with PEF or FEV1at least 80% of predicted normal?
You may not qualify if:
- For female patients: Does the subject use effective contraception and does she have a negative pregnancy test result? (Highly effective methods of birth control are defined as those which result in a low failure rate (i.e. less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly such as implants, injectibles, combined or oral contraceptives, some IUDs, sexual abstinence or vasectomised partner. No pharmacological interactions are known for hormonal contraceptives and specific immunotherapeutic preparations.)
- Does the subject suffer from rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms documented in the subjects diary during the baseline season?
- Does the subject have demonstrated a symptom-score of at least 4 per day during the week following the peak pollen count in the baseline season?
- Is the subject unable to understand and comply with the requirements of the trial, as judged by the investigator?
- Is/was the subject involved in the planning and conduct of the trial?
- Is the subject an employee of Allergopharma Joachim Ganzer KG or of one of the trial sites?
- Is the subject in any relationship of dependence with the sponsor and/or with the investigator?
- Has the subject been previously enrolled or randomised to treatment in the present trial?
- Is the subject mentally disabled?
- Is the subject institutionalised due to an official or judicial order?
- Does the subject have a positive pregnancy test before the baseline phase?
- Does the subject use an unacceptable and unreliable contraceptive method during the trial, as judged by the investigator?
- Is the subject pregnant or within the lactation period?
- Is the subject seeking to become pregnant?
- Has the subject undergone previous specific immunotherapy with grass pollen allergens in any formulation?
- +22 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Allergopharma GmbH & Co. KG
Hamburg, Reinbek, 21465, Germany
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nicolas Hunzelmann, Prof. Dr.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 13, 2011
First Posted
May 16, 2011
Study Start
October 1, 2009
Primary Completion
August 1, 2012
Study Completion
September 1, 2014
Last Updated
November 13, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-11