Development and Pilot Evaluation of a Web-supported Programme of Constraint Induced Therapy Following Stroke (LifeCIT)
1 other identifier
interventional
19
1 country
1
Brief Summary
When a person has had a stroke they often lose their confidence, motivation and the ability to move one arm and hand. Recent research has shown that intensive exercise assists recovery of movement, but people are often discouraged by slow progress and stop using their weak limb. A new idea, called Constraint Induced Therapy (CIT), has been shown to overcome this habitual 'non-use'. CIT involves wearing a mitt on the unaffected hand for several hours a day to prevent it from being used. Use of the weak arm and hand is encouraged by intensive exercises. CIT is not available in the NHS because of lack of therapist time for supervision and patients lack the confidence and motivation to carry out CIT alone at home. This study will have two stages. Stage 1. The aim of this part of the study is to develop a web-based therapy programme ('LifeCIT') to support patients carrying out CIT at home (with their carer where possible) with online therapist support. The investigators will develop the therapy programme working closely with at least 12 patients, 6 carers and 6 therapists to identify and resolve any problems. Stage 2 The investigators will then carry out a pilot trial in 6 treatment centers with 20 patients who have just been discharged from hospital and who have loss of arm and hand function. To test LifeCIT the investigators will randomly allocate patients to receive either the LifeCIT intervention or usual care. A researcher, who doesn't know which group patients have been allocated to, will measure their arm and hand function, record the problems this causes and how it affects their quality of life. Tests will be repeated after treatment (3 weeks) and 6 months later. The investigators will also examine the cost-effectiveness of treatment and ask both therapists and patients for their views.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1 stroke
Started May 2011
Typical duration for phase_1 stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 6, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 9, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 6, 2019
CompletedMay 6, 2019
February 1, 2019
3.6 years
May 6, 2011
December 9, 2015
February 4, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Upper Limb Impairment: Motor Activity Log (MAL) Amount of Use (AOU)
The MAL comprises 28 functional items, (e.g. picking up a glass; turning a key to open the door) each item is assessed by self-report on a six-point ordinal scale (0-5). Participants are asked to rate the amount of use of their hemiplegic arm for each item. Zero is scored if they have not used their affected arm, five is scored when they use their affected as often as before their stroke occurred. The final MAL score is calculated as a mean score of the individual items. The minimum and maximum mean scores are 0-5, with higher values representing better outcomes.
Baseline, Post intervention (three weeks) and 6 months
Change From Baseline in Upper Limb Impairment: Motor Activity Log (MAL) Quality of Use (QOU)
he MAL comprises 28 functional items, (e.g. picking up a glass; turning a key to open the door) each item is assessed by self-report on a six-point ordinal scale (0-5). Participants are asked to rate the quality of use of their hemiplegic arm for each item. Zero is scored if they can not use their affected arm, five is scored when they can use their affected arm as well as before their stroke occurred. The final MAL score is calculated as a mean score of the individual items. The minimum and maximum mean scores are 0-5, with higher values representing better outcomes.
Baseline, Post Intervention (three weeks) and 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in Upper Limb Function: Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) Functional Ability Scale (FAS)
Baseline, Post intervention (three weeks), 6 months
Change in Upper Limb Impairment: Fugel Myer Upper Extremity (FMUE)
Baseline, Post Intervention (three weeks) and 6 months
Change in Occupational Performance: Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Performance (COPM)
Baseline, Post intervention (three weeks) and 6 months
Study Arms (2)
LifeCIT
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be asked to aim to wear the C-MIT for 9 hours a day for 5 days/week, including 4-6 hours of structured activities per day: two 30-60 minute sessions of web-based activities and 3-4 hours practicing everyday activities.
Standard Care
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants received their usual care which included home exercises
Interventions
Participants will be asked to aim to wear the C-MIT for 9 hours a day for 5 days/week, including 4-6 hours of structured activities per day: two 30-60 minute sessions of web-based activities and 3-4 hours practicing everyday activities.
Participants will receive their usual care from their NHS provider.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke affecting either right or left upper limb
- Either: a) Able to transfer safely between toilet, chair and standing and able to walk safely at home wearing the C-MIT with or without the use of a walking aid or b) primarily a wheelchair user having help or supervision to transfer and walk
- Mini-mental score \>23
- Minimum of 10 degrees of active wrist extension measured by a hand held goniometer
- Discharged home from hospital (not institutional care)
- Access to internet at home
You may not qualify if:
- Major medical problems that could interfere with participation
- Severe pain of the hemiparetic shoulder, arm or hand either at rest or during movement.
- People for whom communication problems prevent effective use of the system, will be excluded unless they have a carer who can support them effectively.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Southampton
Southampton, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jane Burridge
- Organization
- University of Southampton
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jane Burridge, PhD
Professor at University of Southampton
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 6, 2011
First Posted
May 9, 2011
Study Start
May 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
May 6, 2019
Results First Posted
May 6, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02