Ruxolitinib (INCB018424) in Participants With Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post Essential Thrombocythemia-myelofibrosis and Post Polycythemia Vera-myelofibrosis (PPV-MF)
An Open-Label Assessment of Safety and Efficacy of Ruxolitinib (INCB018424) in Subjects With Primary Myelofibrosis, Post- Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis, and Post-Polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis Who Have Platelet Counts of 50 × 10^9/L to 100 × 10^9/L
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
38
Brief Summary
To evaluate the effects of treatment with ruxolitinib (INCB018424) on spleen volume, symptoms and potential side effects in participants with PMF, PPV-MF and PET-MF who have platelet counts of 50 x 10\^9/L to 100 x 10\^9/L. It is anticipated that individualized dose optimization from the starting ruxolitinib level of 5 mg bid will be associated with reductions in splenomegaly, MF-associated symptoms and inflammatory cytokine levels.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jun 2011
Longer than P75 for phase_2
38 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 4, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 5, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 19, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 19, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 28, 2020
CompletedJanuary 28, 2020
January 1, 2020
7.5 years
May 4, 2011
December 16, 2019
January 17, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Percent Change From Baseline in Spleen Volume at Week 24 by Final Titrated Dose
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the upper and lower abdomen and pelvis was performed to assess spleen volumes. Computed tomography (CT) scan was performed if participant was not a candidate for MRI or if MRI was not readily available. MRI was performed with a body coil. Spleen volume was obtained by outlining the circumference of the organ and determining the volume using the validated technique of least squares. The MRI (or CT scan in applicable participants) was performed on the first or second day of the baseline period (ie, Day -7 or Day -6), and the site radiologist sent the scan to the central imaging laboratory that same day. The CT scans were processed by the same central laboratory used for MRIs.
Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Symptom Score (TSS) as Measured by the Modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) V2.0 Diary at Week 24 by Final Titrated Dose
Symptoms of myelofibrosis were assessed using a modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) Version 2.0 diary. Using the diary, patients rated the following symptoms on a scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable): night sweats, itching, abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs on left, feeling of fullness (early satiety), and muscle/bone pain. The total symptom score ranged from 0-60 and was calculated as the sum of the 6 symptom scores. A higher score indicates worse symptoms.
Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
TEAE was defined as adverse events that began or worsened from baseline after the first administration of the study drug. Participants were analyzed based on the number of subjects who received a dose within the dose group. The percentages for each column are calculated using this N. Participants who had more than 1 event in an AE category (eg, treatment-related TEAE) are counted once at each dose level the event occurred.
Up to Week 156
Percentage of Participants With New Onset Grade 4 Thrombocytopenia Events as Assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (CTCAE V4.03)
Participants with platelet count between 50 and 100 × 10\^9/L at the screening and/or baseline visit were enrolled in the study. Thrombocytopenia is defined as a condition with low blood platelet count. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was platelet count \< 25 × 10\^9/L. Participants were analyzed based on the number of subjects who received a dose within the dose group. The percentages for each column are calculated using this N. Participants who had more than 1 event in an AE category (eg, treatment-related TEAE) are counted once at each dose level the event occurred.
Up to Week 156
Percentage of Participants With New Onset Grade 2 or Higher Hemorrhage as Assessed by CTCAE V4.03
Hemorrhages were defined as any lower level terms by MedDRA included in the Standardized MedDRA Query (SMQ) for hemorrhage terms. Participants were analyzed based on the number of subjects who received a dose within the dose group. The percentages for each column are calculated using this N. Participants who had more than 1 event in an AE category (eg, treatment-related TEAE) are counted once at each dose level the event occurred.
Up to Week 156
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Percent Change in Spleen Volume at Week 24 Compared to Baseline
Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change in Total Symptom Score as Measured by the Modified MFSAF V2.0 Diary at Week 24 Compared to Baseline
Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume at Week 24 Compared to Baseline
Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With ≥10% Reduction in Spleen Volume at Week 24 Compared to Baseline
Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Improvement in Total Symptom Score as Measured by the Modified MFSAF V2.0 Diary at Week 24 Compared to Baseline
Baseline and Week 24
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Ruxolitinib 5 mg
EXPERIMENTALParticipants began administration with 5 mg ruxolitinib twice daily (BID) orally. Beginning at the Week 4 visit, doses of ruxolitinib could be increased in 5 mg once a day (QD) increments every 4 weeks every 4 weeks not to exceed a dose of 25 mg BID.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with PMF, PPV-MF or PET-MF as confirmed by bone marrow biopsy
- Discontinuation of all drugs used to treat underlying MF disease at least 14 days prior to baseline visit
- INR \<= 1.5 or PTT value \< 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) at study entry
- Hemoglobin level at least 6.5 g/dL at Screening visit
- Willingness to be transfused to treat low hemoglobin levels
You may not qualify if:
- Females who are pregnant, unable to comply with birth control use to avoid becoming pregnant or breastfeeding
- Males who cannot comply with birth control use to avoid fathering a child
- Platelet count \< 50 x10\^9/L or absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \< 1 x10\^9/L at the Screening visit
- Inadequate liver or renal function; Intracranial bleeds or invasive malignancy over the previous 2 years - international normalized ratio (INR) laboratory values cannot be \> 1.5 x upper limit of normal at study entry.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (38)
Unknown Facility
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Burbank, California, United States
Unknown Facility
La Jolla, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Los Angeles, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Pomona, California, United States
Unknown Facility
San Diego, California, United States
Unknown Facility
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Orange City, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Augusta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Unknown Facility
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Southfield, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Morristown, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Somerville, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
New York, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Hickory, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Canton, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Portland, Oregon, United States
Unknown Facility
Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
Burlington, Vermont, United States
Related Publications (2)
Talpaz M, Prchal J, Afrin L, Arcasoy M, Hamburg S, Clark J, Kornacki D, Colucci P, Verstovsek S. Safety and Efficacy of Ruxolitinib in Patients with Myelofibrosis and Low Platelet Counts (50 - 100 x 109/L): Final Analysis of an Open-Label Phase 2 Study. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 May;22(5):336-346. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.10.016. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
PMID: 34911667DERIVEDTalpaz M, Paquette R, Afrin L, Hamburg SI, Prchal JT, Jamieson K, Terebelo HR, Ortega GL, Lyons RM, Tiu RV, Winton EF, Natrajan K, Odenike O, Claxton D, Peng W, O'Neill P, Erickson-Viitanen S, Leopold L, Sandor V, Levy RS, Kantarjian HM, Verstovsek S. Interim analysis of safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis and low platelet counts. J Hematol Oncol. 2013 Oct 29;6(1):81. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-6-81.
PMID: 24283202DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Participants with platelet counts of 50 to 100 x 10\^9/L were enrolled to begin ruxolitinib at 5 mg BID. Subjects could then titrate their dose to an dose that offers benefit. Only the overall data was calculated for the Participant and Baseline data.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Incyte Corporation
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Peter Langmuir, MD
Incyte Corporation
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
- Expanded Access
- Yes
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 4, 2011
First Posted
May 5, 2011
Study Start
June 15, 2011
Primary Completion
December 19, 2018
Study Completion
December 19, 2018
Last Updated
January 28, 2020
Results First Posted
January 28, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01