NCT01348490

Brief Summary

To evaluate the effects of treatment with ruxolitinib (INCB018424) on spleen volume, symptoms and potential side effects in participants with PMF, PPV-MF and PET-MF who have platelet counts of 50 x 10\^9/L to 100 x 10\^9/L. It is anticipated that individualized dose optimization from the starting ruxolitinib level of 5 mg bid will be associated with reductions in splenomegaly, MF-associated symptoms and inflammatory cytokine levels.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
66

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2011

Longer than P75 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

38 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 4, 2011

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 5, 2011

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 15, 2011

Completed
7.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 19, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 19, 2018

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 28, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

January 28, 2020

Status Verified

January 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

7.5 years

First QC Date

May 4, 2011

Results QC Date

December 16, 2019

Last Update Submit

January 17, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

PMFPPV-MFPET-MF

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Percent Change From Baseline in Spleen Volume at Week 24 by Final Titrated Dose

    Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the upper and lower abdomen and pelvis was performed to assess spleen volumes. Computed tomography (CT) scan was performed if participant was not a candidate for MRI or if MRI was not readily available. MRI was performed with a body coil. Spleen volume was obtained by outlining the circumference of the organ and determining the volume using the validated technique of least squares. The MRI (or CT scan in applicable participants) was performed on the first or second day of the baseline period (ie, Day -7 or Day -6), and the site radiologist sent the scan to the central imaging laboratory that same day. The CT scans were processed by the same central laboratory used for MRIs.

    Baseline and Week 24

  • Percent Change From Baseline in Total Symptom Score (TSS) as Measured by the Modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) V2.0 Diary at Week 24 by Final Titrated Dose

    Symptoms of myelofibrosis were assessed using a modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) Version 2.0 diary. Using the diary, patients rated the following symptoms on a scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable): night sweats, itching, abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs on left, feeling of fullness (early satiety), and muscle/bone pain. The total symptom score ranged from 0-60 and was calculated as the sum of the 6 symptom scores. A higher score indicates worse symptoms.

    Baseline and Week 24

  • Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

    TEAE was defined as adverse events that began or worsened from baseline after the first administration of the study drug. Participants were analyzed based on the number of subjects who received a dose within the dose group. The percentages for each column are calculated using this N. Participants who had more than 1 event in an AE category (eg, treatment-related TEAE) are counted once at each dose level the event occurred.

    Up to Week 156

  • Percentage of Participants With New Onset Grade 4 Thrombocytopenia Events as Assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (CTCAE V4.03)

    Participants with platelet count between 50 and 100 × 10\^9/L at the screening and/or baseline visit were enrolled in the study. Thrombocytopenia is defined as a condition with low blood platelet count. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was platelet count \< 25 × 10\^9/L. Participants were analyzed based on the number of subjects who received a dose within the dose group. The percentages for each column are calculated using this N. Participants who had more than 1 event in an AE category (eg, treatment-related TEAE) are counted once at each dose level the event occurred.

    Up to Week 156

  • Percentage of Participants With New Onset Grade 2 or Higher Hemorrhage as Assessed by CTCAE V4.03

    Hemorrhages were defined as any lower level terms by MedDRA included in the Standardized MedDRA Query (SMQ) for hemorrhage terms. Participants were analyzed based on the number of subjects who received a dose within the dose group. The percentages for each column are calculated using this N. Participants who had more than 1 event in an AE category (eg, treatment-related TEAE) are counted once at each dose level the event occurred.

    Up to Week 156

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Percent Change in Spleen Volume at Week 24 Compared to Baseline

    Baseline and Week 24

  • Percent Change in Total Symptom Score as Measured by the Modified MFSAF V2.0 Diary at Week 24 Compared to Baseline

    Baseline and Week 24

  • Percentage of Participants With ≥ 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume at Week 24 Compared to Baseline

    Baseline and Week 24

  • Percentage of Participants With ≥10% Reduction in Spleen Volume at Week 24 Compared to Baseline

    Baseline and Week 24

  • Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Improvement in Total Symptom Score as Measured by the Modified MFSAF V2.0 Diary at Week 24 Compared to Baseline

    Baseline and Week 24

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Ruxolitinib 5 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants began administration with 5 mg ruxolitinib twice daily (BID) orally. Beginning at the Week 4 visit, doses of ruxolitinib could be increased in 5 mg once a day (QD) increments every 4 weeks every 4 weeks not to exceed a dose of 25 mg BID.

Drug: Ruxolitinib

Interventions

Ruxolitinib (INCB018424), 5 mg bid

Also known as: INCB018424
Ruxolitinib 5 mg

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosed with PMF, PPV-MF or PET-MF as confirmed by bone marrow biopsy
  • Discontinuation of all drugs used to treat underlying MF disease at least 14 days prior to baseline visit
  • INR \<= 1.5 or PTT value \< 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) at study entry
  • Hemoglobin level at least 6.5 g/dL at Screening visit
  • Willingness to be transfused to treat low hemoglobin levels

You may not qualify if:

  • Females who are pregnant, unable to comply with birth control use to avoid becoming pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Males who cannot comply with birth control use to avoid fathering a child
  • Platelet count \< 50 x10\^9/L or absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \< 1 x10\^9/L at the Screening visit
  • Inadequate liver or renal function; Intracranial bleeds or invasive malignancy over the previous 2 years - international normalized ratio (INR) laboratory values cannot be \> 1.5 x upper limit of normal at study entry.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (38)

Unknown Facility

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Burbank, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

La Jolla, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Los Angeles, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Pomona, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Diego, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Orange City, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Southfield, Michigan, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Morristown, New Jersey, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Somerville, New Jersey, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New York, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Canton, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Portland, Oregon, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Danville, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Houston, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Talpaz M, Prchal J, Afrin L, Arcasoy M, Hamburg S, Clark J, Kornacki D, Colucci P, Verstovsek S. Safety and Efficacy of Ruxolitinib in Patients with Myelofibrosis and Low Platelet Counts (50 - 100 x 109/L): Final Analysis of an Open-Label Phase 2 Study. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 May;22(5):336-346. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.10.016. Epub 2021 Nov 2.

  • Talpaz M, Paquette R, Afrin L, Hamburg SI, Prchal JT, Jamieson K, Terebelo HR, Ortega GL, Lyons RM, Tiu RV, Winton EF, Natrajan K, Odenike O, Claxton D, Peng W, O'Neill P, Erickson-Viitanen S, Leopold L, Sandor V, Levy RS, Kantarjian HM, Verstovsek S. Interim analysis of safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis and low platelet counts. J Hematol Oncol. 2013 Oct 29;6(1):81. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-6-81.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Myeloproliferative Disorders

Interventions

ruxolitinib

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bone Marrow DiseasesHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

Participants with platelet counts of 50 to 100 x 10\^9/L were enrolled to begin ruxolitinib at 5 mg BID. Subjects could then titrate their dose to an dose that offers benefit. Only the overall data was calculated for the Participant and Baseline data.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Study Director
Organization
Incyte Corporation

Study Officials

  • Peter Langmuir, MD

    Incyte Corporation

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR
Expanded Access
Yes

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2011

First Posted

May 5, 2011

Study Start

June 15, 2011

Primary Completion

December 19, 2018

Study Completion

December 19, 2018

Last Updated

January 28, 2020

Results First Posted

January 28, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-01

Locations