Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous CXA-201 and Intravenous Levofloxacin in Complicated Urinary Tract Infection, Including Pyelonephritis
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Phase 3 Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous CXA-201 and Intravenous Levofloxacin in Complicated Urinary Tract Infection, Including Pyelonephritis
3 other identifiers
interventional
558
17 countries
76
Brief Summary
This is a Phase 3, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, double dummy study of CXA 201 IV infusions (1500 mg q8h) versus levofloxacin IV infusions (750 mg qd) for the treatment of adults with a cUTI (including pyelonephritis).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Jun 2011
76 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 28, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 2, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 20, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 11, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 4, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 15, 2015
CompletedOctober 25, 2018
September 1, 2018
2.1 years
April 28, 2011
January 9, 2015
September 27, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Percentage of Subjects Who Have Both a Per-subject Microbiological Outcome of Eradication and a Clinical Outcome of Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Modified ITT (mMITT) Population
Test of Cure Visit (7 Days [± 2 days] after completion of study drug administration)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The Percentage of Subjects Who Have Both a Per-subject Microbiological Outcome of Eradication and a Clinical Outcome of Cure at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population.
Test of Cure Visit (7 Days [± 2 days] after completion of study drug administration)
Study Arms (2)
CXA-201 as treatment for cUTI
EXPERIMENTALCXA-201 IV infusion (1500mg q8) for 7 days
Levofloxacin as treatment for cUTI
ACTIVE COMPARATORLevofloxacin IV infusion (750mg qd) for 7 days
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Provide written informed consent prior to any study-related procedure not part of normal medical care (a legally acceptable representative may provide consent if the subject is unable to do so, provided this is approved by local country and institution specific guidelines).
- Be males or females ≥ 18 years of age
- If female, subject is non-lactating, and is either:
- Not of childbearing potential, defined as postmenopausal for at least 1 year or surgically sterile due to bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy, or hysterectomy; or
- Of childbearing potential and is practicing a barrier method of birth control (e.g., a diaphragm or contraceptive sponge) along with 1 of the following methods: oral or parenteral contraceptives (for 3 months prior to study drug administration), or a vasectomized partner. Or, subject is practicing abstinence from sexual intercourse. Subjects must be willing to practice these methods for the duration of the trial and for at least 35 days after last dose of study medication.
- Males are required to practice reliable birth control methods (condom or other barrier device) during the conduct of the study and for at least 35 days after last dose of study medication.
- Pyuria (white blood cell \[WBC\] count \> 10/μL in unspun urine or ≥ 10 per high power field in spun urine).
- Clinical signs and/or symptoms of cUTI, either of:
- Pyelonephritis, as indicated by at least 2 of the following:
- Documented fever (oral temperature \> 38°C) accompanied by patient symptoms of rigors, chills, or "warmth";
- Flank pain;
- Costovertebral angle tenderness or suprapubic tenderness on physical exam; or
- nausea or vomiting; OR
- Complicated lower UTI, as indicated by at least 2 of the following:
- At least 2 of the following new or worsening symptoms of cUTI:
- +13 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Have a documented history of any moderate or severe hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any β-lactam or quinilone antibacterial (Note: for β-lactams, a history of a mild rash followed by uneventful re-exposure is not a contraindication to enrollment)
- Have a concomitant infection at the time of randomization, which requires non-study systemic antibacterial therapy in addition to IV study drug therapy. (Drugs with only gram-positive activity \[e.g., vancomycin, linezolid\] are allowed.)
- Receipt of any amount of potentially therapeutic antibacterial therapy after collection of the pretreatment baseline urine culture and before administration of the first dose of study drug.
- Receipt of any dose of a potentially therapeutic antibacterial agent for the treatment of the current UTI within 48 hours before the study-qualifying pretreatment baseline urine is obtained (exceptions: subjects with an active cUTI who have received prior antibiotics may be enrolled provided a minimum of 48 hours have elapsed between the last dose of the prior antibiotic and the time of obtaining the baseline urine specimen. Subjects receiving current antibiotic prophylaxis for cUTI who present with signs and symptoms consistent with an active new cUTI may be enrolled provided all other eligibility criteria are met including obtaining a pre-treatment qualifying baseline urine culture).
- Intractable urinary infection at baseline that the Investigator anticipates would require more than 7 days of study drug therapy.
- Complete, permanent obstruction of the urinary tract.
- Confirmed fungal urinary tract infection at time of randomization (with ≥ 103 fungal CFU/mL).
- Permanent indwelling bladder catheter or urinary stent including nephrostomy.
- Suspected or confirmed perinephric or intrarenal abscess.
- Suspected or confirmed prostatitis.
- Ileal loop or known vesico-ureteral reflux.
- Severe impairment of renal function including an estimated CrCl \< 30 mL/min, requirement for peritoneal dialysis, hemodialysis or hemofiltration, or oliguria (\< 20 mL/h urine output over 24 hours).
- Current urinary catheter that is not scheduled to be removed before the EOT (intermittent straight catheterization during the IV study drug administration period is acceptable).
- Any condition or circumstance that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would compromise the safety of the subject or the quality of study data.
- Any rapidly progressing disease or immediately life-threatening illness including acute hepatic failure, respiratory failure, and septic shock.
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (76)
Unknown Facility
San Diego, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Hialeah, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Teaneck, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande de Sul, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Sao Jose de Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Unknown Facility
São Paulo, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Cali, Valle del Cauca Department, Colombia
Unknown Facility
Armenia, Colombia
Unknown Facility
Barranquilla, Colombia
Unknown Facility
Bogotá, Colombia
Unknown Facility
Kohtla-Järve, Estonia
Unknown Facility
Tallinn, Estonia
Unknown Facility
Tartu, Estonia
Unknown Facility
Tbilisi, Georgia
Unknown Facility
Giessen, Hesse, Germany
Unknown Facility
Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
Unknown Facility
Miskolc, Borsod-Abauj Zemplen county, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Gyor, Budapest, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Szentes, Csongrád megye, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Sopron, Győr-Moson-Sopron, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Salgótarján, Nógrád megye, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Nyíregyháza, Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Zalaegerszeg, Zala County, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Budapest, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Tatabánya, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Kfar Saba, Sharon, Israel
Unknown Facility
Petah Tikva, Teah Tiqwa, Israel
Unknown Facility
Tel Litwinsky, Tel Aviv, Israel
Unknown Facility
Haifa, Israel
Unknown Facility
Jerusalem, Israel
Unknown Facility
Safed, Israel
Unknown Facility
Daugavpils, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Liepāja, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Riga, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Valmiera, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Ventspills, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Chihuahua City, Mexico
Unknown Facility
San Luis Potosí City, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Veracruz, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Chisinau, Moldova
Unknown Facility
Oradea, Bihor County, Romania
Unknown Facility
Bucharest, București, Romania
Unknown Facility
Timișoara, Timiș County, Romania
Unknown Facility
Brasov, Romania
Unknown Facility
Bucharest, Romania
Unknown Facility
Iași, Romania
Unknown Facility
Sibiu, Romania
Unknown Facility
Kemerovo, Russia
Unknown Facility
Moscow, Russia
Unknown Facility
Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
Unknown Facility
Novosibirsk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Penza, Russia
Unknown Facility
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Unknown Facility
Saratov, Russia
Unknown Facility
Belgrade, Serbia
Unknown Facility
Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Levice, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Martin, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Prešov, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Skalica, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Bloemfontein, Free State, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Soweto, Gauteng, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Middleburg, Mpumalanga, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Bellville, Western Cape, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Nakorn Ratchasima, Changwat Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
Unknown Facility
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Unknown Facility
Lopburi, Thailand
Unknown Facility
Prachuap Khiri Khan, Thailand
Related Publications (6)
Popejoy MW, Long J, Huntington JA. Analysis of patients with diabetes and complicated intra-abdominal infection or complicated urinary tract infection in phase 3 trials of ceftolozane/tazobactam. BMC Infect Dis. 2017 May 2;17(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2414-9.
PMID: 28464828DERIVEDXiao Y, Tong ML, Liu LL, Lin LR, Chen MJ, Zhang HL, Zheng WH, Li SL, Lin HL, Lin ZF, Xing HQ, Niu JJ, Yang TC. Novel predictors of neurosyphilis among HIV-negative syphilis patients with neurological symptoms: an observational study. BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2339-3.
PMID: 28446129DERIVEDKullar R, Wagenlehner FM, Popejoy MW, Long J, Yu B, Goldstein EJ. Does moderate renal impairment affect clinical outcomes in complicated intra-abdominal and complicated urinary tract infections? Analysis of two randomized controlled trials with ceftolozane/tazobactam. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Mar 1;72(3):900-905. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw486.
PMID: 27999024DERIVEDArmstrong ES, Mikulca JA, Cloutier DJ, Bliss CA, Steenbergen JN. Outcomes of high-dose levofloxacin therapy remain bound to the levofloxacin minimum inhibitory concentration in complicated urinary tract infections. BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Nov 25;16(1):710. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-2057-2.
PMID: 27887579DERIVEDHuntington JA, Sakoulas G, Umeh O, Cloutier DJ, Steenbergen JN, Bliss C, Goldstein EJ. Efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam versus levofloxacin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) caused by levofloxacin-resistant pathogens: results from the ASPECT-cUTI trial. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Jul;71(7):2014-21. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw053. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
PMID: 26994090DERIVEDWagenlehner FM, Umeh O, Steenbergen J, Yuan G, Darouiche RO. Ceftolozane-tazobactam compared with levofloxacin in the treatment of complicated urinary-tract infections, including pyelonephritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial (ASPECT-cUTI). Lancet. 2015 May 16;385(9981):1949-56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62220-0. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
PMID: 25931244DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Two identical P3 protocols were initiated (NCT01345929 and NCT01345955) subsequently, Cubist and FDA agreed that integrated data from the 2 protocols could be analyzed and reported in a single Clinical Study Report. These analyses are presented here.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Obi Umeh, Vice President Global Medical Sciences
- Organization
- Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Obiamiwe Umeh, M.D., MSc.
Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 28, 2011
First Posted
May 2, 2011
Study Start
June 20, 2011
Primary Completion
August 11, 2013
Study Completion
September 4, 2013
Last Updated
October 25, 2018
Results First Posted
January 15, 2015
Record last verified: 2018-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
https://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/pdf/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf