Best Promising Drug Association With Azacitidine in Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes
AZA-PLUS
Randomized Phase II Trial Seeking the Most Promising Drug Association With Azacitidine- in Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes
1 other identifier
interventional
320
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In order to improve the overall survival benefit observed with AZA in higher risk MDS, its combination with other active drugs in MDS must be tested. Among drugs that have demonstrated to be active as a single agent in MDS and have preclinical potential additive or synergistic activity with AZA are Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors including Valproic acid, Lenalidomide and idarubicin. Phase I studies have already been conducted or are being conducted combining those agents to demethylating agents, showing a low toxicity profile and significant responses in high risk MDS. In this phase II randomized trial, we want to identify the most promising combination of Azacitidine and another drug (among 3 drugs: Valproic acid, Lenalidomide and Idarubicin) in higher risk MDS, by comparison to Azacitidine alone. Of note, based on efficacy and toxicity, one or several combinations may be stopped, and others, previously tested in phase I trials, included after protocol amendment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jun 2011
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 21, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 27, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2019
CompletedFebruary 19, 2019
February 1, 2019
7.1 years
April 21, 2011
February 18, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Remission, complete, partial or medullary after 6 cycles
Achievement of remission, complete, partial or medullary, according to the IWG 2006 criteria39 (see section 10 below) after 6 cycles
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Stable disease with hematological improvement
3 and 6 months
Duration of response
within 3 years
Progression to acute myeloid leukemia
3 years
Overall survival
3 years
Number of adverse events
3 years
Study Arms (4)
Azacitidine alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORAzacitidine +Valproic acid
EXPERIMENTALAzacitidine +Lenalidomide
EXPERIMENTALAzacitidine + Idarubicine
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
6 cycles of Azacitidine 75 mg/m2 subcutaneously daily for 7 days, every 4 weeks The first course will be started on day 1 regardless of the blood count. Subsequent courses will be scheduled every 4 weeks
6 cycles of Azacitidine 75 mg/m2 subcutaneously daily for 7 days, every 4 weeks Valproic Acid (Depakine-Chrono®) (VPA) will be administered concomitantly for a minimum of 6 cycles. \- In patients aged 60 years or less: VPA (25 mg/kg twice a day i.e. 50 mg/kg/d) administered orally, daily for 7 days (days 1-7) \- In patients older than 60 years: VPA (17.5 mg/kg twice a day i.e. 35 mg/Kg/d) administered orally daily for 7 days (days 1-7)
6 cycles of Azacitidine 75 mg/m2 subcutaneously daily for 7 days, every 4 weeks Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) will be administered once daily orally as continuous schedule started on day 1 of Azacitidine. Patients will receive Lenalidomide 10 mg/d, during 14 days (D1 to D14)
Azacitidine (Vidaza®) will be administered similarly to group 1 exposed above. Idarubicin (Zavedos®) as the reconstituted solution, will be administered slowly by the intravenous route over 60 minutes at 10 mg/m²of body-surface area on day 8 of Azacitidine or day 10 if azacitidine was administered according to (5-2-2 regimen)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age\>=18 years
- Must be able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements
- Documented diagnosis of MDS, including AREB-t according to FAB classification or CMML (with WBC \< 13,000/mm3) that meets IPSS criteria for intermediate-2 or high-risk.
- Patients should be willing to use adequate contraceptive methods during all the duration of the study
You may not qualify if:
- Treatment with AZA or Decitabine in the previous 6 months
- Previous treatment with any HDAC inhibitor (Sodium valproate, Vorinostat, depsipeptide ou NSC-630176, MS 275, LAQ-824, PXD-101, LBH589, MGCD0103, CRA024781, etc). If Sodium Valproate (Depakine®) was used for seizure, a wash-out period of at least 30 days is required and an appropriate treatment replacement should be performed.
- Ongoing treatment with corticosteroids exceeding 30mg of prednisone per day. A wash out period of at least 7 days is required.
- HIV infection
- Creatinine \> 1.5 ULN
- Serum AST or ALT \> 3.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Serum total bilirubin \> 1.5 mg/dl (except for unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia due to Gilbert's disease or secondary to MDS).
- ≥ grade-2 neuropathy
- Previous history of Acute myeloblastic leukemia (with marrow blasts\>30%)
- Previous history of allogeneic stem cell transplantation
- Contra-indication to Anthracyclines: Myocardiopathy, uncontrolled infection, serious renal or hepatic impairment; associated with yellow fever vaccine
- Known hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients of Vidaza®, of valproate, of divalproate, of valpromide, of Lenalidomide, of thalidomide, of idarubicin and/or anthracyclines
- Patients with a history of severe congestive heart failure, clinically unstable cardiac or pulmonary disease
- All hepatitis or known personal or familial severe hepatitis, particularly due to drugs
- Depression with suicidal tendency
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Avicenne hospital
Bobigny, 93009, France
Related Publications (1)
Jacob L, Uvarova M, Boulet S, Begaj I, Chevret S. Evaluation of a multi-arm multi-stage Bayesian design for phase II drug selection trials - an example in hemato-oncology. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Jun 2;16:67. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0166-7.
PMID: 27250349DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pierre Fenaux, MD, PhD
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 21, 2011
First Posted
April 27, 2011
Study Start
June 1, 2011
Primary Completion
July 1, 2018
Study Completion
June 1, 2019
Last Updated
February 19, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02