NCT01341366

Brief Summary

Background: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery has been shown by randomized trials to be associated with better short-term clinical outcomes when compared with open surgery. However, in a traditional perioperative care setting, the reduction in hospital stay following laparoscopic surgery in these trials was modest. Fast-track perioperative programs have been introduced in the West to optimize perioperative factors to reduce the physiological/psychological stress of open colorectal surgery. However, few studies have evaluated the impact of fast-track programs on the outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Objective: To compare the clinical and immunological outcomes of Hong Kong Chinese patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer with a "traditional" vs. a "fast-track" perioperative program. Design: Prospective randomized trial. Subjects: One hundred and twenty-eight consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic resection of non-metastatic colonic and upper rectal cancer will be recruited. Interventions: Patients will be randomized to a "traditional" or a "fast-track" perioperative program. Outcome measures: Primary outcome: total postoperative hospital stay, including hospital stay of patients who are readmitted within 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes: immunological parameters (including systemic cytokine response and cell-mediated immune function), morbidity and mortality, quality of life, and medical costs.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
128

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3 colorectal-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2010

Shorter than P25 for phase_3 colorectal-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2010

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 20, 2011

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 25, 2011

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

April 30, 2013

Status Verified

April 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

April 20, 2011

Last Update Submit

April 29, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Laparoscopic surgery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Duration of hospital stay

    Total postoperative hospital stay, including hospital stay of patients who are readmitted within 30 days after surgery.

    Up to 1 month

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Pain scores

    Up to 1 week

  • Morbidity and mortality

    Up to 1 month

  • Readmission rate

    Up to 1 month

  • Quality of life

    Up to 1 month

  • Direct/indirect medical costs and out-of-hospital economic costs

    Up to 1 month

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Fast-track perioperative program

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Fast-track perioperative program

Traditional perioperative program

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Other: Traditional perioperative program

Interventions

Preoperative counseling, no preoperative fasting, short-acting anesthetics, continuous infiltration of wound with local anesthetic agent, non-opioid pain management, the use of chewing gum, and early postoperative feeding and mobilization

Fast-track perioperative program

Preoperative fasting, standard anesthetic management with no intraoperative fluid restriction, opioid pain management, no chewing gum, feeding/mobilization according to attending surgeon

Traditional perioperative program

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic resection of colonic and upper rectal cancer,
  • Age of patients between 18 and 75 years
  • Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists grading I-II
  • Patients with no severe physical disability
  • Patients who require no assistance with the activities of daily living
  • Informed consent available

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision, abdominoperineal resection, or total/proctocolectomy
  • Patients with planned stoma creation
  • Patients undergoing emergency surgery
  • Patients with known metastatic disease
  • Patients with previous history of abdominal surgery
  • Patients with known immunological dysfunction
  • Patients who are taking steroids or immunosuppressive agents
  • Patients with chronic pain syndrome

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong, China

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Simon SM Ng, MD

    Chinese University of Hong Kong

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2011

First Posted

April 25, 2011

Study Start

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion

March 1, 2013

Study Completion

March 1, 2013

Last Updated

April 30, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-04

Locations