A Phase II Study of Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma
BOLT
Phase II, Randomized Double-blind Study of Efficacy and Safety of Two Dose Levels of LDE225 in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma
2 other identifiers
interventional
230
12 countries
62
Brief Summary
This study assessed the efficacy and safety of oral treatment with two dose levels of LDE225 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic BCC.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jun 2011
Longer than P75 for phase_2
62 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 30, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 29, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 28, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 23, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 29, 2018
CompletedAugust 28, 2019
August 1, 2019
2 years
March 30, 2011
August 24, 2015
August 13, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Central Review According to mRECIST (for Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma (laBCC)) and RECIST 1.1 (for Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma (mBCC)) Per Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (pEAS)
ORR is the percentage of patient's objective response (ORR) by 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment. A responder was defined as a subject with confirmed partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment.Treatment with sonidegib was considered sufficiently efficacious if the observed ORR on any treatment arm at the end of the study was 30% or higher. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.
6 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Central Review According to mRECIST (for Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma (laBCC)) and RECIST 1.1 (Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma (mBCC)) Per Full Analysis Set (FAS)
ORR is the percentage of patient's objective response (ORR) by 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment. A responder was defined as a subject with confirmed partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment.Treatment with sonidegib was to be considered sufficiently efficacious if the observed ORR on any treatment arm at the end of the study was 30% or higher. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Duration of Response (DoR) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS)
42 months
Duration of Response (DoR) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (FAS)
42 months
Complete Response Rate (CRR) Per Central Review (pEAS)
42 months
Complete Response Rate (CRR) Per Central Review (FAS)
6 months
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS)
42 months
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
LDE225 200 mg
EXPERIMENTALThe study was double blinded and enrolled at least 50 evaluable patients in the 200 mg LDE225 arm. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 was analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
LDE225 800 mg
EXPERIMENTALThe study was double blinded and enrolled at least 100 evaluable patients in the 800 mg LDE225 arm. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 was analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
Interventions
LDE225 was administered orally, on a continuous once daily dosing schedule and was supplied as 200 mg hard gelatin capsules in bottles. Every 4 weeks on the day of study visit, patients received a prescription of an adequate drug supply for self-administration at home. The 800 mg dose patients received 4 capsules of LDE225 and 200 mg dose arm patients received 1 LDE225 capsule + 3 placebo capsules.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with locally advanced BCC and metastatic BCC
- Patients with adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who had had major surgery within 4 weeks of initiation of study medication
- Patients unable to take oral drugs or with lack of physical integrity of the upper gastrointestinal tract, or known malabsorption syndromes.
- Patients with concurrent medical conditions that may interfere or potentially affect the interpretation of the study.
- Patients with neuromuscular disorders or are on concurrent treatment with drugs that may cause muscle damage.
- Patients who were on concurrent therapy with other anti-neoplastic agents.
- Patients who had taken part in an experimental drug within 4 weeks of initiation of study medication.
- Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women
- Women of child bearing potential unwilling to use 2 forms of highly effective contraception throughout the study and for 3 months after the last treatment
- Fertile males not willing to use condoms throughout the study and for 3 months after the last treatment.
- Patients who were unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (62)
Highlands Oncology Group
Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72703, United States
University of California at Los Angeles UCLA 3
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
Stanford University Medical Center Stanford Univ 2
Stanford, California, 94304, United States
University of Colorado School of Medicine UC
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Washington Hospital Center Wash Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Cutaneous Onc Dept
Tampa, Florida, 33612, United States
NorthwesternUniv.Med.School/Robert H. Lurie Comp.Cancer Ctr Study coordinator
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Dana Farber Cancer Institute DFCI - MA
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
Henry Ford Hospital Henry Ford
Detroit, Michigan, 48202 2689, United States
Washington University School Of Medicine-Siteman Cancer Ctr Siteman
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada CCC of Nevada- Southwest (2)
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89109, United States
Hackensack University Medical Center Hackensack (SC)
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601, United States
New York University Medical Center SC-2
New York, New York, 10016, United States
Penn State University / Milton S. Hershey Medical Center Hershey Medical
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033-085, United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center UPMC
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
Baylor Health Care System/Sammons Cancer Center Baylor Texas Oncology
Dallas, Texas, 75246, United States
Texas Oncology Tex Onc 3
Dallas, Texas, 75246, United States
Texas Oncology Texas Onc - Amarillo
Dallas, Texas, 75246, United States
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center MD Anderson
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Texas Oncology Cancer Care & Research Center
Waco, Texas, 76712, United States
Texoma Cancer Center Texoma Cancer Center
Wichita Falls, Texas, 76310, United States
University of Utah / Huntsman Cancer Institute Huntsman/Univ UT
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84103, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065, Australia
Novartis Investigative Site
Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia
Novartis Investigative Site
Brussels, 1200, Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 1C4, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Sainte-Foy, Quebec, G1V 4T3, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Lyon, 69373, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Marseille, 13885, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Pierre-Bénite, 69495, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Toulouse, 31059, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Villejuif, 94805, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 13353, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Essen, 45147, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Gera, 07548, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Hanover, 30625, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Kiel, 24105, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Mainz, 55131, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
München, 81377, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Münster, 48157, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Stade, 21682, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Athens, 161 21, Greece
Novartis Investigative Site
Budapest, H-1085, Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Debrecen, 4032, Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Szeged, H-6725, Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Torino, TO, 10126, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Napoli, 80131, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08035, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28034, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28046, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Bern, 3010, Switzerland
Novartis Investigative Site
Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
Novartis Investigative Site
Zurich, 8091, Switzerland
Novartis Investigative Site
High Heaton, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Yeovil, Somerset, BA21 4AT, United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Cardiff, CF14 4XW, United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Glasgow, G3 8SJ, United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Leicester, LE1 5WW, United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
London, EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Manchester, M13 9WL, United Kingdom
Related Publications (4)
Gutzmer R, Robert C, Loquai C, Schadendorf D, Squittieri N, Arntz R, Martelli S, Dummer R. Assessment of various efficacy outcomes using ERIVANCE-like criteria in patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma receiving sonidegib: results from a preplanned sensitivity analysis. BMC Cancer. 2021 Nov 19;21(1):1244. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08968-1.
PMID: 34798846DERIVEDLewis K, Dummer R, Farberg AS, Guminski A, Squittieri N, Migden M. Effects of Sonidegib Following Dose Reduction and Treatment Interruption in Patients with Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma During 42-Month BOLT Trial. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Dec;11(6):2225-2234. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00619-4. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
PMID: 34669179DERIVEDLear JT, Migden MR, Lewis KD, Chang ALS, Guminski A, Gutzmer R, Dirix L, Combemale P, Stratigos A, Plummer R, Castro H, Yi T, Mone M, Zhou J, Trefzer U, Kaatz M, Loquai C, Kudchadkar R, Sellami D, Dummer R. Long-term efficacy and safety of sonidegib in patients with locally advanced and metastatic basal cell carcinoma: 30-month analysis of the randomized phase 2 BOLT study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Mar;32(3):372-381. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14542. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
PMID: 28846163DERIVEDMigden MR, Guminski A, Gutzmer R, Dirix L, Lewis KD, Combemale P, Herd RM, Kudchadkar R, Trefzer U, Gogov S, Pallaud C, Yi T, Mone M, Kaatz M, Loquai C, Stratigos AJ, Schulze HJ, Plummer R, Chang AL, Cornelis F, Lear JT, Sellami D, Dummer R. Treatment with two different doses of sonidegib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic basal cell carcinoma (BOLT): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jun;16(6):716-28. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70100-2. Epub 2015 May 14.
PMID: 25981810DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
230 patients evaluated in the Full Analysis Set: 79 randomized to LDE225 (Sonidegib) 200mg group \& 151 randomized to LDE225 800mg group. 1 patient randomized to the 800mg group did not receive study treatment \& thus was not counted in the Safety Set.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2011
First Posted
April 1, 2011
Study Start
June 29, 2011
Primary Completion
June 28, 2013
Study Completion
June 29, 2018
Last Updated
August 28, 2019
Results First Posted
November 23, 2015
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Access Criteria
- Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent expert panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data is currently available according to the process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.