Pipamperone/Citalopram (PNB01) Versus Citalopram (CIT) and Versus Pipamperone (PIP) in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
2 other identifiers
interventional
555
2 countries
31
Brief Summary
The overall objective of this trial is to demonstrate clinically relevant superior antidepressant efficacy of the fixed dose combination PNB01 (low dose pipamperone and citalopram) over reference antidepressant treatment with citalopram alone, and a low dose of psychoactive pipamperone alone in patients with moderate to severe Major Depressive Disorder. This study was specifically designed to assess patient related outcome (PRO) parameters using an Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) via telephone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 major-depressive-disorder
Started Sep 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 major-depressive-disorder
31 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 11, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 7, 2022
CompletedApril 7, 2022
March 1, 2022
1.2 years
March 8, 2011
December 15, 2014
March 14, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Early and Sustained (Antidepressant) Response (ESR) Rate
Early and Sustained Response (ESR) is defined as a MADRS total score reduction from Baseline of 50% or more and a MADRS total score ≤16 at Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, and Week 6.
From (end of) Week 2 visit to (end of) Week 6 visit
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline in Total MADRS Score at Week 6
From Baseline (Day 1) to (end of) Week 6
Change From Baseline in Total SDS Score at Week 6
From Baseline (Day 1) to (end of) Week 6 visit
Study Arms (3)
PNB01
EXPERIMENTALoral, once daily administration
citalopram
ACTIVE COMPARATORoral, once daily administration
pipamperone
SHAM COMPARATORoral, once daily administration
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient is informed and given ample time and opportunity to think about her/his participation and has given her/his written informed consent.
- Patient understands the investigational nature of the trial and is willing and able to comply with the trial requirements.
- Patient is male or female, aged ≥ 18 years.
- Patient has MDD according to the DSM IV-R criteria with an existence of depressed mood (DSM-IV-R Crit. A1) and loss of interest/anhedonia (DSM-IV-R Crit. A2) as confirmed by the MINI, lasting for at least 4 weeks and no longer than 18 months (78 weeks) for the current episode, and causing significant functional impairment (DSM-IV-R MDD C- criterion).
- CGI-S rating of at least 4 and a minimum MADRS total score of 26 using IVRS ePRO at Baseline.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient is pregnant, nursing, or is a woman of child-bearing potential who is not surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal, or who does not consistently use 2 combined effective methods of contraception (including at least 1 barrier method), unless sexually abstinent.
- Existence of Mood Disorder with psychotic features and/or high suicidality risk, as confirmed by MINI.
- Concomitant diagnosis of any additional primary Axis I disorder and presence of any of the following co-morbid disorders: (Hypo)manic episode, Panic Disorder (limited symptom attacks allowed), Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, Post-traumatic Stress Disorder, Alcohol dependence, any other Substance abuse and/or dependence, Psychotic Disorder, Eating Disorder, or General Anxiety Disorder, as confirmed by MINI.
- Concomitant diagnosis of any primary Axis II disorder.
- Patient is hospitalized.
- Patient has a clinically relevant renal dysfunction (e.g. GFR \<60mL/min).
- Patient has hepatic dysfunction (total bilirubin \>2.0mg/dL or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) greater than 2 times the upper limit of the reference range).
- Patient has a malignant neoplastic disease, a documented history of epilepsy (juvenile convulsions excepted) or a documented, in the opinion of the investigator, clinically relevant risk of bleeding (eg. severe bleeding disorder, treatment with warfarin, …).
- Patient with a documented history or concomitant diagnosis or significant risk of cardiac arrhythmia or dysrhythmia, including a QTc interval of ≥500 ms at Baseline.
- Patient has any other medical or psychiatric condition, which in the opinion of the investigator, can jeopardize or would compromise the patient's ability to participate in this trial or that would interfere with trial assessments.
- Patient with documented alcohol or drug abuse, or having a positive standard screen for alcohol or drugs (including benzodiazepines and opioids).
- Concomitant treatment with diuretics, QT prolongation drugs, or dopamine agonists.
- Resistant depression defined as having failed to respond to either: a/ 2 previous antidepressants at an adequate dose administered for at least 4 weeks during the current episode; b/ augmentation therapy with any atypical antipsychotic drug
- Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation therapy (rTMS) within the last 6 months; Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) or Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) ever.
- Formal psychotherapy or alternative treatment for 1 week prior to or during the study.
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (31)
Site 103
Glendale, California, United States
Site 101
National City, California, United States
Site 113
Riverside, California, United States
Site 106
San Diego, California, United States
Site 116
San Diego, California, United States
Site 112
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
Site 135
Miami, Florida, United States
Site 108
Winter Park, Florida, United States
Site 133
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Site 128
Smyrna, Georgia, United States
Site 132
Libertyville, Illinois, United States
Site 117
Schaumburg, Illinois, United States
Site 110
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Site 109
Flowood, Mississippi, United States
Site 115
New York, New York, United States
Site 126
Beachwood, Ohio, United States
Site 127
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Site 124
Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States
Site 105
Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States
Site 123
Media, Pennsylvania, United States
Site 122
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Site 119
Austin, Texas, United States
Site 104
Dallas, Texas, United States
Site 102
Wichita Falls, Texas, United States
Site 107
Kirkland, Washington, United States
Site 134
Seattle, Washington, United States
Site 201
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
Site 202
Penticton, British Columbia, Canada
Site 205
Chatham, Ontario, Canada
Site 203
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Site 204
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
To avoid limited risk of concluding efficacy when there is no effect, hierarchical testing was implemented with following order of confirmatory tests: 1) Patient-ESR rates of PNB01vs citalopram 2) If above testing is sig., repeat patient-ESR testing for PNB01vs pipamperone 3) In case in 1 of these 2 tests PNB01 does not have sig. higher ESR rate, trial is considered negative, \& no following sec. confirmatory tests are to be executed. Secondary Outcome Measures were therefore not completed
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. E. Buntinx, MD
- Organization
- ANeuroTech
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Michael E Thase, MD
Director, Mood and Anxiety Section; 3535 Market Street, Suite 670; Philadelphia, PA 19104-3309, United States of America
- STUDY CHAIR
Max Schmauss, MD
Bezirkskrankenhaus Augsburg Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik Dr.-Mack-Straße 1 D-86156 Augsburg, Germany
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Philippe Lemmens, PhD
Pharmaneuroboost N.V. Alkerstraat 30A B-3570 Alken, Belgium
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2011
First Posted
March 11, 2011
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
November 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 7, 2022
Results First Posted
April 7, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03