Synchronized Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (sTMS) in Major Depressive Disorder
NEST-MDD
Evaluation of Low Emission NeoSync EEG Synchronized TMS Technology for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
202
1 country
18
Brief Summary
This study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of synchronized transcranial magnetic stimulation (sTMS) using the NeoSync EEG Synchronized TMS device (NEST) in subjects with Major Depressive Disorder. This is a multicenter study in which subjects will be randomized to receive treatment 5 days per week for 6 weeks. Subjects who complete 6 weeks of double-blind treatment may be eligible to receive up to four weeks of open label sTMS therapy or antidepressant medications during the follow-up phase of the study. Follow-up evaluation visits will be conducted during those four weeks, with the frequency of the visits determined by the treatment choice during that timeframe.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 major-depressive-disorder
Started May 2012
18 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 8, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 10, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 14, 2015
CompletedOctober 26, 2015
October 1, 2015
1.3 years
June 8, 2011
June 2, 2015
October 5, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Mean HAM-D17 Total Score Change (Intent to Treat - All)
The mean HAM-D17 total score change from Baseline (Day 0) to Week 6 compared between the active treatment and sham-controlled groups. If any subject did not complete the double-blind phase in the ITT population, the assessment last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used. The single value provided in each arm reflects the change seen. For this trial, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D28) was performed as a baseline assessment. A subset of the HAM-D28, the HAM-D17, was utilized as both a baseline and efficacy measure. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. The HAM-D17 score ranges from 0-52; a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates at least moderate severity. A reduction of 50% or more in total score from Baseline indicates clinical response.
Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6)
Mean HAM-D17 Total Score Change (Per Protocol - All)
The mean HAM-D17 total score change from Baseline (Day 0) to Week 6 compared between the active treatment and sham-controlled groups. All subjects in the Per Protocol analysis completed Week 6. Baseline HAM-D17 total score was directly compared to the HAM-D17 total score at Week 6. The single value provided in each arm reflects the change seen. For this trial, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D28) was performed as a baseline assessment. A subset of the HAM-D28, the HAM-D17, was utilized as both a baseline and efficacy measure. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. The HAM-D17 score ranges from 0-52; a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates at least moderate severity. A reduction of 50% or more in total score from Baseline indicates clinical response.
Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Mean HAM-D17 Total Score Change (Per Protocol - Non-Naive Subjects)
Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6)
Number of Subjects Who Demonstrate Clinical Response at Week 6 or Early Termination (Intent to Treat)
Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6)
Number of Subjects Who Demonstrate Clinical Response at Week 6 (Per Protocol - All)
Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6)
Number of Subjects Who Demonstrate Clinical Response at Week 6 (Per Protocol - Non-Naive Subjects)
Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6)
Number of Subjects Who Demonstrate Clinical Remission at Week 6 or Early Termination (Intent to Treat)
Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6)
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Active sTMS
EXPERIMENTALTreatment with the NEST-1 Device
Sham
SHAM COMPARATORTreatment with a sham (inactive) device, identical in sound and appearance to the NEST-1 Device
Interventions
The NeoSync EEG Synchronized TMS (NEST) is an electromechanical medical device that produces and delivers a sinusoidal magnetic field to areas of the brain in the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder.
The sham device is configured to simulate the actual NEST-1 device without sTMS therapy being actively delivered.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects will meet the DSM-IV-TR primary diagnosis of initial or recurrent Major Depressive Disorder by DSM-IV-TR criteria rendered by structured interview using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI).
- HAM-D17 score \>= 17 and Item 1 score greater than or equal to 2.
- Duration of current episode \>=8 weeks. The definition of an episode is demarcated by a period of \>=2 months when the subject did not meet full criteria for the DSM-IV-TR definition of Major Depressive Episode. Maximum duration of current episode cannot exceed 2 years.
- The baseline EEG is of sufficient duration and quality that it can be processed for quantitative analysis.
- Subjects are willing and able to adhere to the intensive treatment schedule and all required study visits.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects are unable or unwilling to give informed consent.
- Diagnosed with the following conditions (current unless otherwise stated):
- Any other current primary Axis I mood, anxiety, or psychotic disorder, including bipolar disorder.
- Depression secondary to a general medical condition, or substance-induced.
- History of substance abuse or dependence within the past 6 months (except nicotine and caffeine).
- Any bipolar disorder or psychotic disorder (lifetime), including schizoaffective disorder, or major depression with psychotic features in this or previous episodes.
- Eating disorder (current or within the past year).
- Obsessive compulsive disorder (lifetime).
- Post-traumatic stress disorder (current or within the past year).
- ADHD (currently being treated).
- Subjects meeting criteria for Axis II cluster A or B diagnosis based upon DSM-IV TR criteria, which in the judgment of the Investigator may hinder the subjects in completing the procedures required by the study protocol.
- Subjects with a clinically defined neurological disorder including, but not limited to:
- Any condition likely to be associated with increased intracranial pressure.
- Space occupying brain lesion.
- Any history of seizure EXCEPT those therapeutically induced by ECT (childhood febrile seizures are acceptable and these subjects may be included in the study).
- +32 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (18)
UCLA Depression Research & Clinic Program
Los Angeles, California, 90024, United States
UCSD Medical Center
San Diego, California, 92103, United States
UCLA-Harbor
Torrance, California, 90509, United States
Hartford Hospital Institute of Living
Hartford, Connecticut, 06106, United States
TMS Specialists Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60602, United States
Sheppard Pratt Health System
Baltimore, Maryland, 21285, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198, United States
Center for Mood Disorders and Neuromodulation Therapies, UMDNJ-SOM
Cherry Hill, New Jersey, 08003, United States
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York, New York, 10029, United States
Duke University Brain Stimulation and Neurophysiology Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Wake Forest University Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Mood Disorders Treatment Research Program University of Pittsburgh-Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
Butler Hospital Mood Disorders Research Program, Brown Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior
Providence, Rhode Island, 02906, United States
MUSC Institute of Psychiatry, Brain Stimulation Lab
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
R/D Clinical Research
Lake Jackson, Texas, 77566, United States
Related Publications (1)
Leuchter AF, Cook IA, Feifel D, Goethe JW, Husain M, Carpenter LL, Thase ME, Krystal AD, Philip NS, Bhati MT, Burke WJ, Howland RH, Sheline YI, Aaronson ST, Iosifescu DV, O'Reardon JP, Gilmer WS, Jain R, Burgoyne KS, Phillips B, Manberg PJ, Massaro J, Hunter AM, Lisanby SH, George MS. Efficacy and Safety of Low-field Synchronized Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (sTMS) for Treatment of Major Depression. Brain Stimul. 2015 Jul-Aug;8(4):787-94. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 May 22.
PMID: 26143022RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Andrew Leuchter, MD
- Organization
- University of California Los Angeles
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrew Leuchter, MD
UCLA Depression Research & Clinic Program
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 8, 2011
First Posted
June 10, 2011
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
August 1, 2013
Study Completion
September 1, 2013
Last Updated
October 26, 2015
Results First Posted
July 14, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-10