NCT01299051

Brief Summary

The proposal of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two worksite weight management programs at Duke: Steps to Health (STH) ('usual standard of care') and the more extensive Steps to Health Plus! (STH+). We have added an additional follow-up, by invitation only, for participants in the study who agreed to be contacted for future research.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
550

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2011

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2011

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 3, 2011

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 18, 2011

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2014

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

March 8, 2016

Status Verified

March 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

February 3, 2011

Last Update Submit

March 7, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Weight ManagementEmployee Health

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Weight loss

    Determine whether employees participating in STH+ will lose significantly more body mass than participants in STH.

    ~1-2 years post baseline

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Improvement in level of physical activity

    ~1-2 years post baseline.

  • Relative impact of the different programs

    ~1-2 years post baseline

  • Relative cost of different programs

    ~1-3 years post baseline

  • Improvement in nutrition

    ~1-2 years post baseline

Study Arms (3)

Steps to Health

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Steps to Health worksite weight management program at Duke.

Behavioral: Steps to Health

Steps to Health Plus!

EXPERIMENTAL

Steps to Health Plus! worksite weight management program at Duke. Also known as Pathways to Change.

Behavioral: Steps to Health Plus!

Observational Comparison

NO INTERVENTION

Observational comparison group consisting of employees who are eligible for the study but do not take part will also be used in analyses (approximately 1500 subjects).

Interventions

Steps to HealthBEHAVIORAL

Steps to Health (STH): The STH curriculum is a 12-month educational program targeting obese employees for healthy lifestyle changes for weight loss. The program includes: * Face-to-face visit with counselor during Month 1 to set specific health goals. * Telephone counseling at 6 and 12 months, coupled with biometric feedback sessions. * Monthly generic health education materials sent via e-mail. * Incentives (up to 1,000 STH dollars \[$100\]) to take part in the program assessments.

Also known as: STH
Steps to Health

The STH+ intervention is an intensive 12-month behavioral intervention targeting obese employees. It is stage-based and works with the participant at his/her level of readiness to change using counseling based on motivational interviewing. STH+ includes: * Face-to-face visit with counselor at Month 1 * Meeting with exercise physiologist in Month 2 * Monthly counseling sessions (in-person in Months 3, 6, 9 and 12, others via telephone) * Meeting with exercise physiologist during Month 5 * Quarterly biometric feedback (Months 3, 6, 9, and 12) * Incentives (up to 1,000 STH dollars \[$100\]) to take part in the program assessments.

Also known as: STH+, PTC
Steps to Health Plus!

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Completion of a Health Risk Assessment
  • BMI ≥ 30
  • Able to read and understand study materials which are presented in English
  • No plans to leave Duke in the next year
  • Enrolled in one of the Duke health plans
  • Not currently pregnant

You may not qualify if:

  • Enrolled in the other available individual intervention programs (hypertension, cholesterol or pre-diabetes)
  • Enrolling in one of the LFL weight management programs in order to qualify for bariatric surgery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Duke University Dept. of Community and Family Medicine

Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Ostbye T, Stroo M, Brouwer RJ, Peterson BL, Eisenstein EL, Fuemmeler BF, Joyner J, Gulley L, Dement JM. The steps to health employee weight management randomized control trial: rationale, design and baseline characteristics. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Jul;35(2):68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 May 3.

    PMID: 23648394BACKGROUND
  • Ostbye T, Stroo M, Brouwer RJ, Peterson BL, Eisenstein EL, Fuemmeler BF, Joyner J, Gulley L, Dement JM. Steps to Health employee weight management randomized control trial: short-term follow-up results. J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Feb;57(2):188-95. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000335.

  • Ostbye T, Stroo M, Eisenstein EL, Dement JM. The Effects of Two Workplace Weight Management Programs and Weight Loss on Health Care Utilization and Costs. J Occup Environ Med. 2016 Feb;58(2):162-9. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000586.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

OverweightObesity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Truls Ostbye, MD, PHD

    Duke University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2011

First Posted

February 18, 2011

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion

October 1, 2014

Study Completion

March 1, 2016

Last Updated

March 8, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-03

Locations