Wireless Stimulation Endocardially for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
WiSE-CRT
Multicenter, Prospective Evaluation of Performance, Safety, and Surveillance of the WiCS-LV System in Patients Indicated for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
1 other identifier
interventional
17
4 countries
10
Brief Summary
The WiCS-LV system is an alternative means to providing left ventricular stimulation for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of the WiCS-LV System in patients with indications for CRT.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable heart-failure
Started Feb 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable heart-failure
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 8, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2016
CompletedFebruary 8, 2017
February 1, 2017
1.2 years
February 8, 2011
February 6, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Number of patients with device-related adverse events as a measure of safety
Device-related adverse events are those in which the WiCS-LV system is directly or indirectly responsible.
24 hour peri-operative and one month
Number of patients with procedure-related adverse events as a measure of safety
Procedure-related adverse events are those which occur during the WiCS-LV system implant procedure.
24 hour perioperative and one month
Bi-ventricular pacing capture
Bi-ventricular pacing capture documented on 12-lead EKG
one month
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Number of patients with device-related adverse events as a measure of safety
6 months
Number of patients with serious adverse events as a measure of safety
6 months
Left ventricular pacing capture
1, 3, and 6 months
Bi-ventricular pacing capture
3 and 6 months
Bi-ventricular pacing capture
1, 3, and 6 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Implant
EXPERIMENTALImplant of the WiCS-LV system
Interventions
Transvascular endocardial implantation of wireless pacing Electrode and subcutaneous implantation of Implantable Pulse Generator
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with standard indication for CRT based upon the most recent guidelines AND meeting criteria for one of these three categories:
- Patients with previously implanted pacemakers or ICD's and meeting standard indications for CRT - referred to as "upgrades"
- Patients in whom attempted coronary sinus lead implantation for CRT has failed - referred to as "untreated"
- Patients with previously implanted CRT device, not responding to CRT (no change or worsening of symptom or NYHA functional class after 6 months of treatment confirmed by investigator) - referred to as "non-responders"
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to comply with the study follow-up or other study requirements
- Contraindication to heparin
- Contraindication to both chronic anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents
- Contraindication to iodinated contrast agents
- Intracardiac thrombus by transesophageal echocardiography
- Age less than 18 years
- Attempted IPG implant within 3 days
- Life expectancy of \< 12 months
- Chronic hemodialysis
- Myocardial infarction within one month
- Major cardiac surgery within one month
- Female of childbearing potential, pregnant, or breastfeeding
- Noncardiac implanted electrical stimulation therapy devices
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
Nouvelles Clinicques Nantaises
Nantes, France
Hospital Pontchaillou-CHU
Rennes, France
Kerckhoff-Klinik
Bad Nauheim, Germany
Herzzentrum Brandenburg
Bernau, Germany
Klinium Coburg gGmbH
Coburg, Germany
Facharztzentrum Dresden-Neustadt GbR
Dresden, Germany
Herzzentrum Leipzig GmbH
Leipzig, Germany
Leiden University Medical Centre
Leiden, Netherlands
Isala Klinieken Zwolle
Zwolle, Netherlands
Cardiocentro Ticini
Lugano, Switzerland
Related Publications (2)
Auricchio A, Delnoy PP, Butter C, Brachmann J, Van Erven L, Spitzer S, Moccetti T, Seifert M, Markou T, Laszo K, Regoli F; Collaborative Study Group. Feasibility, safety, and short-term outcome of leadless ultrasound-based endocardial left ventricular resynchronization in heart failure patients: results of the wireless stimulation endocardially for CRT (WiSE-CRT) study. Europace. 2014 May;16(5):681-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut435. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
PMID: 24497573DERIVEDAuricchio A, Delnoy PP, Regoli F, Seifert M, Markou T, Butter C; collaborative study group. First-in-man implantation of leadless ultrasound-based cardiac stimulation pacing system: novel endocardial left ventricular resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients. Europace. 2013 Aug;15(8):1191-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut124. Epub 2013 May 23.
PMID: 23703364DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Angelo Auricchio, MD
Fondazione Cardiocentro, Lugano CH
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 8, 2011
First Posted
February 11, 2011
Study Start
February 1, 2011
Primary Completion
April 1, 2012
Study Completion
October 1, 2016
Last Updated
February 8, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02