NCT01269372

Brief Summary

This pilot, multi center study will establish the effectiveness of Given PillCam® Platform with the PillCam® Colon 2 Capsule as demonstrated by the identification of subjects with polyps, compared to standard colonoscopy. This study will also use to evaluate the administrative feasibility and data management of study design.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2010

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 18, 2010

Completed
13 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2010

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 4, 2011

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2011

Completed
9.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

October 1, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

November 18, 2010

Results QC Date

January 16, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 30, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

polypscapsule endoscopycolonoscopy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Accuracy of the PillCam® Colon 2 Capsule Endoscopy (CE) for Polyps Per Subject - Sensitivity

    PillCam® Colon 2 Capsule Endoscopy (CE) compared to standard colonoscopy in detecting subjects with polyps equal to or larger than 6 mm and 10 mm as measured by Sensitivity. A positive event was defined as per optical colonoscopy polyp size measurement. Standard colonoscopy is the gold standard.

    Up to 6 weeks

  • Accuracy of the PillCam® Colon 2 Capsule Endoscopy (CE) for Polyps Per Subject - Specificity

    PillCam® Colon 2 Capsule Endoscopy (CE) compared to standard colonoscopy in detecting subjects with polyps equal to or larger than 6 mm and 10 mm as measured by Specificity. A positive event was defined as per optical colonoscopy polyp size measurement. Standard colonoscopy is the gold standard.

    Up to 6 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Accuracy of the PillCam® Colon 2 Capsule Endoscopy (CE) Detecting Polyps Per Location - Sensitivity

    Up to 6 weeks

  • Accuracy of the PillCam® Colon 2 Capsule Endoscopy (CE) Detecting Polyps Per Location - Specificity

    Up to 6 weeks

Study Arms (1)

PillCam Colon 2 and Standard Colonoscopy

OTHER

All subjects received Capsule Endoscopy (CE) using the PillCam Colon 2 followed by a standard colonoscopy.

Device: PillCam Colon 2Device: Colonoscopy

Interventions

Each subject will be required to follow a bowel preparation regimen and will undergo Capsule Endoscopy (CE). Following capsule ingestion and depending on capsule progression through the digestive tract subjects will be required to take an additional volume of laxatives in order to enhance capsule propulsion and maintain adequate cleansing of the colon.

PillCam Colon 2 and Standard Colonoscopy

The colonoscopy procedure will be scheduled approximately 4-6 weeks after the CE procedure, and the colonoscopy bowel preparation will be the same as the bowel preparation for CE.

PillCam Colon 2 and Standard Colonoscopy

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject is between 50 - 75 years of age, and an appropriate candidate for polyp screening.
  • Subject received an explanation about the nature of the study and agrees to provide written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject has a history of colorectal cancer
  • Subjects with history of any positive colon assessment (including CT, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy etc.),
  • Subject with history of negative colon assessment (including CT, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy etc.) \< 5 years.
  • Subject has a first degree relative diagnosed with colorectal cancer before the age of 60 years old or 2 (or more) first degree relatives diagnosed with colorectal cancer at any age.
  • Subject is suspected or diagnosed with familial adenomatous polyposis.
  • Subject is suspected or diagnosed with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer.
  • Subject is suspected or diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease, or chronic ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease.
  • Subject is suspected or diagnosed with hematochezia, melena, Fe deficiency anemia or any other rectal bleeding., including positive FOBT test of any variety
  • Subject is suspected or diagnosed with bowel obstruction.
  • Subject has dysphagia or any swallowing disorder.
  • Subject has congestive heart failure.
  • Subject has Diabetes.
  • Subject has had prior abdominal surgery of the gastrointestinal tract in the last 6 months or other uncomplicated procedures that would be unlikely to lead to bowel obstruction based on the clinical judgment of the investigator.
  • Subject has a cardiac pacemaker or other implanted electro medical device.
  • Subject has any allergy or other known contraindication to the medications used in the study.
  • +10 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Gastroenterology Associates of Tidewater

Chesapeake, Virginia, 23320, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Polyps

Interventions

Colonoscopy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Endoscopy, GastrointestinalEndoscopy, Digestive SystemDiagnostic Techniques, Digestive SystemDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisEndoscopyDiagnostic Techniques, SurgicalDigestive System Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeMinimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

Limitations and Caveats

This was a feasibility study, in accordance with the definition of a feasibility study within the ACT checklist. The feasibility study was used as preparation to study pivotal study number MA- 204 NCT01372878 which has results posted on CT.gov.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Hilla Debby/ Director of Clinical Affairs
Organization
Givenimaging

Study Officials

  • Douglas Rex, Prof.

    Indiana University School of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
DEVICE FEASIBILITY
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2010

First Posted

January 4, 2011

Study Start

December 1, 2010

Primary Completion

July 1, 2011

Study Completion

July 1, 2011

Last Updated

October 1, 2020

Results First Posted

October 1, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-07

Locations