Evaluation of Capsule Endoscopy With PillCam® Colon 2 in Visualization of the Colon
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This pilot, multi center study will establish the effectiveness of Given PillCam® Platform with the PillCam® Colon 2 Capsule as demonstrated by the identification of subjects with polyps, compared to standard colonoscopy. This study will also use to evaluate the administrative feasibility and data management of study design.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2010
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 4, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 1, 2020
CompletedOctober 1, 2020
July 1, 2020
7 months
November 18, 2010
January 16, 2020
September 30, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Accuracy of the PillCam® Colon 2 Capsule Endoscopy (CE) for Polyps Per Subject - Sensitivity
PillCam® Colon 2 Capsule Endoscopy (CE) compared to standard colonoscopy in detecting subjects with polyps equal to or larger than 6 mm and 10 mm as measured by Sensitivity. A positive event was defined as per optical colonoscopy polyp size measurement. Standard colonoscopy is the gold standard.
Up to 6 weeks
Accuracy of the PillCam® Colon 2 Capsule Endoscopy (CE) for Polyps Per Subject - Specificity
PillCam® Colon 2 Capsule Endoscopy (CE) compared to standard colonoscopy in detecting subjects with polyps equal to or larger than 6 mm and 10 mm as measured by Specificity. A positive event was defined as per optical colonoscopy polyp size measurement. Standard colonoscopy is the gold standard.
Up to 6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Accuracy of the PillCam® Colon 2 Capsule Endoscopy (CE) Detecting Polyps Per Location - Sensitivity
Up to 6 weeks
Accuracy of the PillCam® Colon 2 Capsule Endoscopy (CE) Detecting Polyps Per Location - Specificity
Up to 6 weeks
Study Arms (1)
PillCam Colon 2 and Standard Colonoscopy
OTHERAll subjects received Capsule Endoscopy (CE) using the PillCam Colon 2 followed by a standard colonoscopy.
Interventions
Each subject will be required to follow a bowel preparation regimen and will undergo Capsule Endoscopy (CE). Following capsule ingestion and depending on capsule progression through the digestive tract subjects will be required to take an additional volume of laxatives in order to enhance capsule propulsion and maintain adequate cleansing of the colon.
The colonoscopy procedure will be scheduled approximately 4-6 weeks after the CE procedure, and the colonoscopy bowel preparation will be the same as the bowel preparation for CE.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject is between 50 - 75 years of age, and an appropriate candidate for polyp screening.
- Subject received an explanation about the nature of the study and agrees to provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has a history of colorectal cancer
- Subjects with history of any positive colon assessment (including CT, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy etc.),
- Subject with history of negative colon assessment (including CT, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy etc.) \< 5 years.
- Subject has a first degree relative diagnosed with colorectal cancer before the age of 60 years old or 2 (or more) first degree relatives diagnosed with colorectal cancer at any age.
- Subject is suspected or diagnosed with familial adenomatous polyposis.
- Subject is suspected or diagnosed with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer.
- Subject is suspected or diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease, or chronic ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease.
- Subject is suspected or diagnosed with hematochezia, melena, Fe deficiency anemia or any other rectal bleeding., including positive FOBT test of any variety
- Subject is suspected or diagnosed with bowel obstruction.
- Subject has dysphagia or any swallowing disorder.
- Subject has congestive heart failure.
- Subject has Diabetes.
- Subject has had prior abdominal surgery of the gastrointestinal tract in the last 6 months or other uncomplicated procedures that would be unlikely to lead to bowel obstruction based on the clinical judgment of the investigator.
- Subject has a cardiac pacemaker or other implanted electro medical device.
- Subject has any allergy or other known contraindication to the medications used in the study.
- +10 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medtronic - MITGlead
Study Sites (1)
Gastroenterology Associates of Tidewater
Chesapeake, Virginia, 23320, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This was a feasibility study, in accordance with the definition of a feasibility study within the ACT checklist. The feasibility study was used as preparation to study pivotal study number MA- 204 NCT01372878 which has results posted on CT.gov.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Hilla Debby/ Director of Clinical Affairs
- Organization
- Givenimaging
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Douglas Rex, Prof.
Indiana University School of Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2010
First Posted
January 4, 2011
Study Start
December 1, 2010
Primary Completion
July 1, 2011
Study Completion
July 1, 2011
Last Updated
October 1, 2020
Results First Posted
October 1, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07