Effect of Socket Preservation Procedure on Dimensional Changes of the Ridge, and Its Efficacy.
Dimensional Changes of the Alveolar Ridge Contour After Socket Preservation, Stability of Implants Placed, and Histological Evaluation of Newly Formed Bone at These Sites.
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study, the investigators will evaluate the dimensional changes of alveolar bone in the preserved sites in comparison with extraction only conventional healed sockets, as well.
- 1.Dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge contour after socket preservation in comparison to conventional tooth extraction.
- 2.Evaluation the stability of implants placed at the preserved sockets.
- 3.Histological evaluation of newly formed bone at the socket preserved sites in comparison with extracted only healed sites.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Jan 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 3, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 4, 2011
CompletedJanuary 4, 2011
January 1, 2010
11 months
January 3, 2011
January 3, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
soft and hard tissue vertical and horizontal changes
soft and hard tissue measurements include horizontal (Bucco-Lingual dimensions at 1mm,3mm and 7mm at the mid portion from the line connecting two adjacent CEJs) and vertical ridge dimensions (vertical distance from the line connecting two adjacent CEJs at 8 points: Mid-Buccal, Mid-Lingual, Mesial, Distal, Disto-Buccal, Disto-Lingual, Mesio-Buccal, Mesio-Lingual around the socket)
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
histologic evaluation and implant stability measurement
10 months
Study Arms (1)
preserved socket
EXPERIMENTALsockets will be filled with DFDBA and covered with absorbable membrane. Primary coverage will be achieved by full thickness mucosal flap advancement over each socket.
Interventions
sockets will be filled with DFDBA and covered with absorbable membrane. Primary coverage will be achieved by full thickness mucosal flap advancement over each socket
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Non-molar hopeless teeth
- lack of bone volume for ideal implant placement
You may not qualify if:
- Patient's un-wiliness for involvement in the project
- contraindication of surgery due to medically-related problems
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
Mashhad, Khorasan Razavi, 91735-984, Iran
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
hamid reza arab, DDS.,Ms.
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 3, 2011
First Posted
January 4, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Study Completion
December 1, 2010
Last Updated
January 4, 2011
Record last verified: 2010-01