Comparative (Short vs. Standard) Length Implants in Early Stability Patterns.
Early Stability of Short Dental Implants With Shallow Threads in the Posterior Mandible: A Controlled Clinical Pilot Study .
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Early Stability of Short vs. Standard Dental Implants in the Posterior Mandible This study compares how well short dental implants (7mm) work compared to standard-length implants (11mm) when placed in the back part of the lower jaw. Both types of implants have special shallow threads designed to reduce stress on the bone. The main goal is to see how stable they are during the first 4 weeks after placement-a critical time for healing.
- Short implants may be a good option for patients with limited jawbone height, avoiding the need for bone grafting.
- Understanding their early stability helps dentists decide when it's safe to place teeth on them.
- This study uses advanced tools like 3D scans (CBCT) and implant stability measurements (ISQ) to track healing. What will happen in the study?
- Screening: A dental exam and 3D scan to check bone quality.
- Implant Placement:
- Short (7mm) or standard (11mm) implant, depending on your bone height.
- Minimally invasive surgery with local anesthesia.
- Follow-ups: Painless stability checks at end of 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks using a small device (RFA).
- Enough bone width (≥6.5mm).
- No uncontrolled health conditions (e.g., severe diabetes).
- Non-smokers or light smokers (\<10 cigarettes/day).
- Benefits: Free implant placement and monitoring; contributes to better dental care.
- Risks: Typical surgery risks (swelling, infection); rare nerve injury (\<5% chance). How long is the study?
- Active participation: 4 weeks (with optional long-term follow-up).
- Total study duration: \~12 months (including data analysis). Mohammad Abdulwahab Al-Jonaid University of Science and Technology, Sana'a.
- Supervisor: Dr. Ali Al-Hudaied, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Specialist.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 18, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
ExpectedSeptember 9, 2025
September 1, 2025
6 months
July 18, 2025
September 4, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) at Baseline (T0)
Mean Resonance frequency Analysis(RFA) measurement taken immediately post-implantation(T0), to assess primary mechanical stability. ISQ range 1-100, low stability \<60, medium stability 60 to 69, high more than or equal 70. Reported as mean ISQ value per group.
Measurement at implant placement(Day 0)
Insertion Torque value- ITV.
The rotational torque in Ncm,applied during the final quarter-turn of implant insertion. This is direct measure of primary mechanical stability. Reported as mean ITV per group.
Measurement at during implant placement (intraoperative)
Magnitude of Stability Dip
The mean lowest point of stability curve , calculated as the greatest negative change in ISQ value from the baseline T0, measurement for each implant during the 4 -week monitoring period.
from implant placement (Day 0) through week4
Time of Onset of Secondary Stability
The mean time in days post implantation at which the ISQ value begins to consistently increase, indicating the start biological secondary stability. Defined as the time point after the nadir -T2or T3.where the ISQ value shows a positive increase confirmed at the subsequent measurement.
from Day0 , through week 4.
Study Arms (2)
Short Dental Implant Group.
EXPERIMENTALGroup A, Shallow-Threaded ,length 7mm, diameter 4.2mm,10 single dental implants.
Standard Dental Implant Group.
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup B, Shallow-Threaded ,length 11mm, diameter 4.2mm,10 single dental implants.
Interventions
A 7mm long, 4.2mm diameter dental implant with shallow thread (\<0.5mm depth) Macrodesign, surgically placed in the jawbone to restore missing teeth
A 11mm long, 4.2mm diameter dental implant with shallow thread (\<0.5mm depth) macrodesign, surgically placed in the jawbone to restore missing teeth.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. Adults ≥18 years with partial posterior mandibular edentulism. 2. Bone height ≥7 mm and width \>6 mm (CBCT-confirmed). 3. D2/D3 bone density (HU: 350-1250). 4. Healed posterior mandibular sites (3-6 months post-extraction). 5. Good oral hygiene (plaque index ≤1). 6. Willingness to adhere to study protocols.
You may not qualify if:
- \. Uncontrolled systemic diseases (e.g., diabetes with HbA1c \>7%, liver disease) or medications affecting bone healing (e.g., corticosteroids, bisphosphonates).
- \. History of head/neck radiotherapy (with in past year). 3. Heavy smoking (\>10 cigarettes/day). 4. Absolute contraindications for oral surgery (e.g., recent MI/CVA \< 6months, bleeding disorders).
- \. Active periodontal disease, parafunctional habits as bruxism, or prior bone grafting at the site.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
university of Sciences and Technology
Sanaa, 009671, Yemen
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This clinical trial employs partial masking (blinding) to minimize bias in outcome assessments: 1. Blinded Parties * Outcome Assessors: * The researcher performing resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements (ISQ values at T0-T4) is masked to: * Implant length (7mm vs. 11mm) * Insertion torque value (ITV) Rationale: Prevents measurement bias in stability tracking. * Data Analysts: * Statisticians processing ISQ trends are blinded to group allocation until analysis completion. 2. Non-Blinded Parties * Surgeon: Cannot be masked due to visual/tactile differences during osteotomy preparation. * Patients: Aware of implant type due to post-operative healing abutment visibility. 3. Blinding Methods * RFA Protocol: * SmartPeg placement/readings performed by a separate researcher not involved in surgery. * ISQ values recorded using coded forms without implant length details.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.Sc Candidate in Oral Surgery and implantology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2025
First Posted
September 9, 2025
Study Start
August 1, 2025
Primary Completion
February 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
September 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- 6 months from 21/07/2025
- Access Criteria
- De-identified individual participant data will be made available upon reasonable request to corresponding author . Requests require a methodology sound proposal and a signed data access agreement.
Anonymized data available upon request after publication